Imagine That You Just Paid 50 For A New Pair Of Jeans

Imagine That You Just Paid 50 For A New Pair Of Jeans According

1. Imagine that you just paid $50 for a new pair of jeans. According to the circular flow diagram, what decisions were made concerning the jeans you purchased, and who made decisions about the jeans you bought? Your response must be at least 75 words in length.

2. Background information: A worker in the United States and a worker in China can each produce 1,000 pairs of jeans per week. A worker in the United States can produce 50 cell phones in a week, and a worker in China can produce 100 cell phones in a week. Answer the following questions based on this information.

Part A: If each country attempted to produce both jeans and cell phones, how many jeans and cell phones could each country produce? What would be the total number of jeans and cell phones produced by the two countries combined? (Show your work.)

Part B: Calculate the opportunity cost of producing jeans for each country. (Show your work.)

Part C: Calculate the opportunity cost of producing cell phones for each country. (Show your work.)

Part D: Determine how many jeans should be produced by each nation. (Show your work.)

Part E: If each nation should specialize in producing jeans and cell phones, explain why; use economic terminology you have learned in this unit in your explanation.

Part F: Finally, how many total jeans and cell phones will be produced by the two nations combined after specialization?

Paper For Above instruction

The decision to purchase a pair of jeans for $50 involves various economic choices within the framework of the circular flow diagram. This model illustrates how households and firms interact in markets for goods, services, and factors of production. When you buy jeans, you, as a consumer, make a decision to allocate your income towards this good, which reflects your preferences and budget constraints. The retailer or firm that sold you the jeans decides to supply this product, considering costs, demand, and profit objectives. The money you spend flows to the producer, enabling an exchange that benefits both parties: you receive the jeans, fulfilling your desire or need, while the producer gains revenue, allowing for further production and economic activity. The decision-making process about the jeans involves household preferences, producer supply strategies, and market conditions, illustrating the interconnected nature of economic choices in a market economy.

Regarding the background scenario involving workers in the United States and China, analysis of production capabilities reveals insights into specialization and trade benefits. Each country's production potential is limited solely by their current output capacities—each worker can produce 1,000 pairs of jeans weekly, but their cell phone outputs differ significantly (50 in the U.S. and 100 in China). If each country attempts to produce both goods simultaneously, their maximum outputs are constrained by their resources and productivity. For instance, the U.S. could produce up to 1,000 jeans or 50 cell phones weekly, and China could produce the same number of jeans or 100 cell phones. Nevertheless, if they specialize based on comparative advantage, total production would increase, optimizing resource utilization.

Calculating the opportunity costs provides further clarity. For the U.S., producing 1,000 jeans costs the opportunity to produce 50 cell phones, implying an opportunity cost of 1 cell phone per 20 jeans. In contrast, China’s opportunity cost of producing jeans is 2 cell phones per 1,000 jeans, or 1 cell phone per 500 jeans, which indicates the U.S. has a comparative advantage in jeans, while China has a comparative advantage in cell phones based on opportunity costs. Similarly, for cell phones, the U.S. sacrifices 20 jeans per 1 cell phone, whereas China sacrifices 5 jeans per cell phone. These opportunity costs suggest that each country should specialize where they have the lowest opportunity cost, leading to increased efficiency—U.S. should focus on jeans, and China on cell phones.

Implementing specialization would result in increased total output of both goods, leveraging comparative advantage. The U.S. would produce all jeans, and China would produce all cell phones, maximizing global production levels. After specialization, total output would amount to 2,000 jeans (U.S. production) plus 10,000 cell phones (China's production), assuming they fully specialize in their respective areas. This division of labor enhances economic efficiency, increases total output, and benefits both nations through mutually advantageous trade. Consequently, they can exchange goods, allowing consumers in both countries to access a wider variety at lower prices, driving economic growth.

By focusing on their respective strengths, the U.S. and China exemplify the principle of comparative advantage, which underpins the rationale for trade and specialization in modern economies. This approach improves global resource allocation, boosts productivity, and leads to higher standards of living. In conclusion, understanding opportunity costs and comparative advantage is essential for explaining why nations engage in trade and how they benefit from specializing in the goods they produce most efficiently.

References

• Krugman, P. R., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2018). International Economics (11th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economics (19th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Blanchard, O. (2017). Macroeconomics (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Rodrik, D. (2018). Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy. Princeton University Press.
• Fujimoto, T. (2017). The New International Economics of Developing Countries. Springer.
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press.
• Oatley, T. (2019). International Political Economy (6th ed.). Routledge.
• Cavusoglu, H., & Barlas, Y. (2020). Trade and Economic Growth. Springer.
• Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. Anthem Press.