Proslavery Authors: How Do They Justify Slavery?

Proslavery Authors1 How Do These Authors Justify Slavery2 According

Proslavery authors often justify slavery through a variety of theological, pseudo-biological, and economic arguments. They generally posit that slavery is sanctioned by divine authority, citing biblical texts to argue that slavery is part of God's plan and that certain races are naturally predisposed to serve. These authors also argue that slavery benefits both the enslaved and the slaveholders by providing a structured social order and economic prosperity. They depict slaves as content and well-cared-for, suggesting that their enslavement is a benevolent institution rather than a violation of human rights. These authors often contend that African Americans are inferior biologically and intellectually, legitimizing their subjugation as a natural and necessary hierarchy within society. The place of slaves in their societal model is subordinate but also protected and cared for, providing stability and order. They often depict slavery as a positive force for both racial groups and the nation as a whole, despite its inherent cruelty and inhumanity.

Paper For Above instruction

The justification of slavery by proslavery authors is a complex phenomenon rooted in religious, biological, and economic rationalizations that emerged prominently in the antebellum period in the United States. These authors aimed to rationalize the institution of slavery as a moral and natural order that was beneficial for both enslaved Africans and white society. Central to their argument was the use of biblical passages, notably from the Old Testament, which they interpreted as divine approval of slavery. For instance, passages such as Genesis 9:25-27 and Ephesians 6:5-8 were cited to support the idea that slavery was ordained by God and served a divine purpose. Such religious justifications lent moral legitimacy to the institution in the eyes of many Americans who otherwise might have challenged it.

In addition to religious reasons, proslavery authors relied heavily on pseudo-scientific theories that depicted African Americans as inherently inferior in intelligence, morals, and physical capabilities. These biological arguments attempted to establish a racial hierarchy, asserting that Africans were suited to slavery and that their subjugation was natural. This pseudoscience purported that Africans lacked the rational capacity of Europeans, thus making their enslavement justified and inevitable. Such stereotypes reinforced racial discrimination and supported slavery as a natural order.

Economically, proslavery authors emphasized the importance of slavery for the prosperity of the South and the entire nation. They claimed that slavery supported agricultural productivity, especially in the cotton and tobacco industries, which were central to the Southern economy. Slaves were portrayed as necessary for the economic stability and growth of the nation, with proslavery advocates suggesting that abolition would devastate the economy and disrupt social order.

In their portrayal of slaves, these authors often depicted them as contented and well-cared-for beings, a sentiment aimed at discrediting abolitionist arguments that slavery was cruel and inhumane. They argued that enslaved Africans found fulfillment in their labor and that their lives under slavery were better than those of free paupers or impoverished laborers. Such stereotypes served as incredulous justifications for the brutal realities of slavery, including violence, exploitation, and deprivation.

Contrasting sharply with proslavery narratives, abolitionist authors challenged the moral and intellectual underpinnings of slavery. They believed that slavery needed to be abolished because it was fundamentally a human rights violation grounded in racial injustice. They criticized American society for its hypocrisy—professing liberty and equality while perpetuating slavery. Abolitionists argued that slavery dehumanized both enslaved Africans and their white oppressors and that it contradicted the core ideals of American democracy.

Abolitionist writers depicted African Americans as equal in moral and intellectual capacity to whites. They emphasized the humanity, dignity, and potential of African Americans, portraying them as individuals deserving of freedom and equal rights. Unlike the stereotypes used by proslavery authors to justify subjugation, abolitionists highlighted the contributions of African Americans to society, their familial bonds, and their capacity for moral agency.

Regarding their place in society, abolitionist authors believed that African Americans should have full rights as citizens and play an equal role in the nation's social, political, and economic life. They advocated for the emancipation of slaves, the recognition of African Americans’ rights, and the dismantling of racial barriers. In contrast to the hierarchical and subordinate positioning depicted by proslavery advocates, abolitionists envisioned a society based on racial equality, justice, and human dignity.

In conclusion, proslavery authors justified slavery through biblical justifications, pseudo-scientific racial theories, and economic arguments, portraying slaves as contented and lower in the societal hierarchy. In stark contrast, abolitionist authors condemned slavery as a grave injustice, emphasizing the humanity and equality of African Americans and advocating for their full integration into society as free citizens. These differing perspectives reflect the profound moral and ideological divide that characterized American society in the 19th century and ultimately fueled the abolition movement.

References

- Berlin, I. (1998). Freedom's Soldiers: The Black Volunteer Movement During the Civil War. Cambridge University Press.

- Baptist, E. E. (2014). The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism. Basic Books.

- Randall, W. (2010). The Civil War and Reconstruction. Harper Perennial.

- Sandburg, C. (2010). Abraham Lincoln: The Prairie Years. Harcourt.

- Faulkner, T. E. (2010). The Declining Significance of Race: Blacks and Changing American Values. Harvard University Press.

- McPherson, J. M. (1988). Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. Oxford University Press.

- Stowe, H. B. (1852). Uncle Tom's Cabin. John P. Jewett & Company.

- Douglass, F. (1845). Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave. Anti-Slavery Office.

- W.E.B. Du Bois. (1903). The Souls of Black Folk. A.C. McClurg & Co.

- Finkelman, P. (2012). Slavery and the Founders: Race and Liberty in the Age of Jefferson. M.E. Sharpe.