Imagine You Are Working At An Ice Cream Shop

Imagine You Are Working At An Ice Cream Shop It Is In the Middle

Imagine you are working at an ice cream shop. It is in the middle of summer, the shop's busiest season, and the electricity goes out during a storm. Rank the actions that you should take in order of importance, as your performance will be measured regarding your immediate actions. Assess the advantages and/or disadvantages of having more than one source of performance measurement within a company. Support your position with examples. Of the performance measurement sources you provided, select one that you believe your current or previous company could benefit from and explain why.

Paper For Above instruction

In the midst of summer peak hours at an ice cream shop, a sudden electrical outage presents a critical challenge that necessitates immediate and strategic response. Prioritizing actions during such an incident involves assessing the potential impact on customer satisfaction, safety, and operational continuity. The most immediate action should be to ensure customer safety and communicate transparently with customers. This can involve informing them politely about the outage, assuring them that efforts are underway to resolve the issue, and maintaining a calming environment. Next, it is essential to assess the cause of the outage and follow safety protocols to prevent accidents or injuries. If possible, activating backup power sources or moving operations outdoors (if feasible and safe) could be beneficial. Finally, coordinating with maintenance or utility providers to expedite repairs and updating customers and staff on progress are crucial steps. These actions, ranked by importance, help mitigate risks, preserve customer trust, and support efficient resolution of the problem.

Beyond immediate response, effective performance measurement within a company can significantly influence its resilience and efficiency during crises. When considering multiple sources of performance measurement, organizations gain a comprehensive view of their operations. For example, financial metrics (such as revenue and profit margins) provide a quantitative view but may not capture customer satisfaction or employee morale, which are equally vital. The advantage of having more than one source—such as customer feedback, employee evaluations, and operational metrics—is that it facilitates a balanced, multidimensional understanding of performance. This holistic approach enables management to identify specific areas for improvement, foster a more responsive organization, and align strategies with both financial goals and stakeholder expectations.

However, there are disadvantages as well. Multiple performance measures can sometimes lead to conflicting insights that complicate decision-making or dilute focus. For instance, a staff member might excel in customer service (a qualitative measure) but underperform in sales targets (a quantitative measure), creating tension when evaluations rely on only one dimension. Additionally, gathering and analyzing data from various sources can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial time and effort. Despite these challenges, the benefits of a diversified performance measurement system often outweigh the drawbacks, especially in dynamic operational environments like the hospitality industry.

In the context of a business such as an ice cream shop, one particularly beneficial performance measure could be customer satisfaction scores derived from feedback surveys. These scores reflect the customers’ perceptions of service quality, product offerings, and overall experience. Implementing a customer satisfaction measurement system allows managers to identify specific issues affecting patron experience — for example, wait times, cleanliness, or staff friendliness. By addressing these directly, the company can enhance customer loyalty and improve reputation, which are crucial during peak seasons. Furthermore, customer feedback can often highlight operational inefficiencies or unmet needs that may not be evident through financial data alone. Therefore, adopting a structured customer feedback mechanism would enable the ice cream shop to adapt swiftly and improve its service delivery.

References

• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Neely, A., Adams, C., & Kennerley, M. (2002). The performance measurement manifesto. The International Journal of Business Performance Management, 4(1), 1-24.
• Parmenter, D. (2015). Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs. John Wiley & Sons.
• Singh, S. (2017). Customer feedback systems in hospitality industry: A way to improve service quality. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 8(3), 275-286.
• Otley, D. (1999). Performance management using financial and non-financial performance measures: An analysis and review. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363-382.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into measurable outcomes. Harvard Business Press.
• Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (1998). Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 205-238.
• Abbott, M. L., & McKinney, F. (2013). Measuring employee performance: Developing effective criteria for evaluation. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 274-287.
• Chenhall, R. H., & Moers, F. (2015). The current state of management control systems research: A review of published studies and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(1), 1-26.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson Education.