Implementing Strategy For This Critical Thinking Assignment

Implementing Strategyfor This Critical Thinking Assignment You Have B

Implementing Strategy for this Critical Thinking Assignment, you have been asked by IKEA to suggest an organizational chart that the company can consider to better support its international strategy. You should review the IKEA case study from Chapter 8 of your textbook and additional reliable sources about IKEA available on the internet. You are to consider that some top IKEA executives prefer maintaining the current organizational structure, but there is pressure from other leaders to foster more innovation in global expansion. Your task is to analyze and decide on the most suitable organizational structure for IKEA at this point in time, based on concepts of strategy implementation, organizational design elements, and theories discussed in this course. You must justify your recommendation by supporting it with course concepts, principles, and scholarly peer-reviewed articles. Additionally, you should develop a visual organizational chart using software tools or Word. Your paper must include an introduction with a clear thesis statement, a detailed explanation of your proposed organizational chart, justification for your choice, and a concise summary. The paper should be 3-4 pages long (excluding title and references), formatted according to APA guidelines, and supported by at least two recent scholarly sources and course materials, particularly Chapter 9 (“Execution”) from Foundations of Strategy and relevant journal articles.

Paper For Above instruction

In this analysis, I propose that IKEA adopts a hybrid organizational structure that combines elements of both a functional and a divisional structure to effectively support its global strategy while fostering innovation. This structure aims to balance the need for operational efficiency with responsiveness to local market needs and the capability to innovate in an increasingly competitive international landscape.

The decision to recommend a hybrid organizational model stems from several strategic considerations. IKEA's current structure, primarily a functional model with centralized decision-making, offers efficiency and cost control but may stifle local responsiveness and innovation. Conversely, a pure divisional or decentralized structure could enhance responsiveness but might compromise economies of scale and operational consistency. A hybrid approach, therefore, integrates the strengths of both structures—centralized strategic oversight with decentralized operational units—allowing IKEA to leverage global efficiencies while promoting local innovation.

To visualize this structure, I used Microsoft PowerPoint to create an organizational chart that delineates central headquarters responsible for global strategy, innovation, and standardization, and regional divisions that manage localized operations, market adaptation, and customer engagement. Within regions, specific product divisions focus on style, affordability, and sustainability—core IKEA priorities. This chart aligns with strategic ideas from Chapter 9 of the textbook, emphasizing flexible execution, adaptive structures, and strategic alignment.

The justification for this hybrid structure is rooted in contemporary organizational design theories, such as Miles and Snow’s strategic typologies and the contingency approach, which advocate for flexible and contextually appropriate structures (Miles & Snow, 1978; Donaldson, 2001). Research by Radomska (2014) supports that a hybrid model enables organizations to successfully execute complex strategies by aligning organizational form with strategic goals. For IKEA, this structure supports the need for innovation in product offerings and market responsiveness, while maintaining operational control and cost efficiency at the corporate level.

In conclusion, adopting a hybrid organizational structure provides IKEA with the agility to respond to competitive pressures and the flexibility to innovate within its global markets. This approach addresses the strategic demands of international expansion while preserving the efficiencies that support sustainable growth. The visual organizational chart developed complements this analysis and offers a clear blueprint for implementing this strategic change, aligning organizational design with IKEA’s evolving strategic imperatives.

References

  • Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. McGraw-Hill.
  • Radomska, J. (2014). Model of successful strategy execution: Revising the concept. Problems of Management in the 21st Century, 9(3), 151-165.
  • Chu, V., Girdhar, A., & Sood, R. (2013). Couching tiger tames the dragon. Business Today, 22(15), 92-96.
  • Pearce, J. A., & Robinson, R. B. (2013). Strategic management: Planning for domestic and global competition (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Grant, R. M. (2019). Contemporary strategy analysis (10th ed.). Wiley.
  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic management: Concepts and cases (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Harrison, J. S. (2020). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Cengage Learning.
  • Černe, M., Nerstad, C. G. L., Dysvik, A., & Sjøvaag, M. (2014). What lies beneath the surface? A review of the antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S25-S53.
  • Daft, R. L. (2016). Organization theory and design (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Related Assignments