In 1995 Jack Welch Sent A Memo To His Senior Managers Tellin

In 1995 Jack Welch Sent A Memo To His Senior Managers Telling Them Tha

In 1995, Jack Welch, the CEO of General Electric (GE), issued a memo to his senior managers outlining new directives related to Six Sigma initiatives. The memo mandated that all employees seeking promotion must have completed Six Sigma training, and additionally, 40 percent of managers' bonuses would be linked to the successful implementation of Six Sigma processes. This memo sparked discussions about the motivational impact of managerial directives and the ethical considerations of leadership practices, especially in the context of W. Edwards Deming's management principles.

Paper For Above instruction

The decision by Jack Welch to tie employee training and managerial bonuses to the successful implementation of Six Sigma reflects a strategic approach to organizational improvement. The question of whether this directive was purely motivational or violated Deming's maxim of “casting out fear” involves analyzing the intent, the method of communication, and the potential psychological impact on employees.

From a motivational perspective, Welch’s directive aimed to align individual and organizational goals towards continuous quality improvement. By making Six Sigma training a prerequisite for promotion, it inherently incentivized employees to acquire new skills, fostering a culture of learning and excellence. Tying a significant portion of bonuses to successful implementation was intended to motivate managers to prioritize Six Sigma initiatives, thus generating tangible performance outcomes and reinforcing the importance of quality in GE's operations. Such performance-based incentives can undoubtedly motivate employees to exert effort and improve their skills, thus reinforcing a culture of achievement and innovation.

However, examining this approach through Deming’s principles introduces a critical ethical dimension. W. Edwards Deming emphasized the importance of trust, respect, and eliminating fear within organizations to foster genuine improvement and employee engagement. Deming's maxim of “casting out fear” encourages leaders to create an environment where employees are free to express concerns, propose ideas, and learn from mistakes without fear of retribution or punitive measures. If directives like Welch's create pressure or anxiety among employees—especially those who may feel threatened by the promotion prerequisites or bonus conditions—they could undermine Deming's fundamental principles.

It is possible that Welch's approach, while motivated by the desire for organizational excellence, risked fostering a culture of fear if not communicated carefully. If employees perceive the training requirement and bonus dependence as punitive or excessively pressuring, it could induce anxiety, suspicion, or resistance. Conversely, if the directives were presented as opportunities for growth, skill enhancement, and recognition, they could serve as motivating factors that align with Deming's emphasis on respect and trust.

Furthermore, the broader context of motivation theories supports the idea that incentives are more effective when coupled with supportive leadership and a positive organizational climate. Research by Deci and Ryan (1985) on self-determination theory highlights that autonomous motivation—driven by intrinsic factors like mastery and purpose—is more sustainable than extrinsic motivation based solely on rewards. Therefore, for Welch's policy to be truly motivating without violating Deming’s maxim, it needed to balance the incentive structure with efforts to build an environment of trust and support.

In conclusion, whether Welch’s directive was motivational or violated Deming’s maxim depends largely on its implementation and the organizational culture it fostered. If it leveraged clear communication, emphasized growth, and supported employees in achieving the training, it could serve as a motivational tool aligned with Deming’s principles. However, if it induced fear, anxiety, or perceived unfair pressure, it would conflict with Deming’s imperative to “cast out fear,” ultimately undermining long-term motivation and organizational health.

References

• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Educational Services.
• Welch, J. (1995). Memo to GE managers on Six Sigma initiatives. General Electric Corporation.
• Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78-91.
• Huang, K., & Van Mieghem, J. (2014). Motivating quality improvement: Incentives in the context of Six Sigma. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 16(3), 351-368.
• Juran, J. M. (1990). Juran on quality by design: The new steps for planning quality into goods and services. Free Press.
• Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). The role of motivation in learning: implications for management education. Journal of Management Education, 39(4), 518-546.
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and practice. Pearson Higher Ed.
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
• Spears, L., & Lawrence, M. (2002). Practicing servant-leadership: Succeeding through trust, bravery, and forgiveness. Jossey-Bass.