In A Paper Of At Least Two Pages Excluding The Title And Ref
In A Paper Of At Least Two Pages Excluding The Title And Reference Pa
In a paper of at least two pages (excluding the title and reference pages), discuss a minimum of three mobile web applications that are familiar or that you use regularly. Describe the differences between CDMA and GSM. Discuss how CDMA and GSM support the mobile web applications you identified. Provide examples to support your discussion. In your paper, you must use at least two scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook, and be formatted according to APA style guidelines as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Paper For Above instruction
The proliferation of mobile web applications has transformed the way individuals interact with digital services. Among these applications, social media platforms like Facebook, messaging apps such as WhatsApp, and streaming services like Netflix are widely used. These applications rely heavily on cellular network technologies to provide seamless connectivity and data transfer. Understanding how these apps operate over different cellular networks, specifically CDMA and GSM, is essential to grasp the underlying technological support that enables their functionality.
Facebook, as a social media platform, offers real-time engagement, content sharing, and multimedia interactions. WhatsApp provides instant messaging, voice calls, and video chats, while Netflix streamlines on-demand video content across diverse devices. All these applications depend on robust cellular networks to ensure consistent performance, especially in mobile environments where Wi-Fi may not always be accessible.
The two dominant cellular network technologies supporting such applications are Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) and Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM). CDMA, a technology primarily used in North America and parts of Asia, employs a spread spectrum technique that allows multiple users to share the same frequency band simultaneously. Conversely, GSM is based on a time-division multiple access (TDMA) system, which divides the frequency band into time slots assigned to different users. This fundamental difference in architecture influences various aspects of network performance, compatibility, and service provision.
GSM networks are characterized by their global reach, SIM card-based architecture, and widespread adoption, allowing users to easily switch devices and service providers. GSM supports data transmission through technologies like GPRS and EDGE, which facilitate web browsing, app data transfer, and multimedia messaging. In contrast, CDMA networks are typically more complex in terms of device switching due to the lack of standardized SIM cards across all carriers, although modern CDMA networks now incorporate LTE standards for higher data speeds.
The support for mobile web applications varies between these technologies. For instance, Facebook and WhatsApp utilize data connections to perform real-time updates and multimedia exchanges. GSM networks, with their widespread coverage and reliable data protocols like GPRS and LTE, support these apps by providing sufficient bandwidth and low latency for social interactions and streaming. Similarly, Netflix’s requirement for high data rates is well-supported by LTE, which has become standard in GSM networks.
CDMA networks support mobile web applications through their evolution into LTE and CDMA2000 standards. These standards enable similar high-speed data capabilities that support streaming services like Netflix and real-time messaging apps. However, device compatibility and international roaming are more straightforward with GSM because of its standardized SIM card format and global presence.
In conclusion, both CDMA and GSM are instrumental in supporting mobile web applications. While GSM's global reach and standardization make it more user-friendly for switching devices and international roaming, CDMA’s adoption of LTE standards ensures high-speed data access for modern applications. The technological differences reflect in how efficiently these networks support applications like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Netflix, with GSM often providing more flexibility due to its widespread adoption and standardized architecture.
References
- GSM Association. (2020). The history of GSM. Retrieved from https://www.gsma.com/aboutus/gsm-history/
- Sharma, P., & Sharma, S. (2019). Comparison of CDMA and GSM technology for mobile communication. Journal of Mobile Communications, 15(4), 245-258.
- Khan, I., & Malik, M. (2021). The impact of cellular network technologies on mobile applications. International Journal of Communication Systems, 34(2), e4673.
- Lee, D., & Lee, S. (2018). Evolution of mobile network standards and their applications. Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(5), 1245–1255.
- Andrews, J. G., Buzzi, S., Choi, W., Hanly, S., Lozano, A., Soong, A. C., & Zhang, J. C. (2014). What will 5G be? IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6), 1065-1082.