In A Seamless Posting Please Incorporate The Following Quest

In A Seamless Posting Please Incorporate The Following Questions Into

In a seamless posting, please incorporate the following questions into your initial postings: Remember in your research proposal that you need to mention, if you are going to use an experimental or non-experimental approach. Discuss which approach you are considering for your research proposal and why. Student expectations for Forum questions: Your initial Forum posts require a minimum of a 500 word substantive response. Original responses to the Forum group question need to be substantial and significant supported by at least one additional scholarly reference that goes beyond the readings. Students should be using the APUS Online Library to search for peer-reviewed journal articles that help support their argument.

The in-text citation and references will be formatted in APA Style. Your original posting should be posted as a response to the Forum question. Please be sure to use your own words; meet the deliverable length; support your main post (in-text citations AND list of references); use paragraphs in your main post to organize your points and make it more reader-friendly; and post three times per week. Please avoid “i” … etc and be sure to start each new sentence with a capital letter. Students will also be required to respond to at least two (2) other students posting with significant comments that demonstrate critical thinking by asking additional questions or adding to the body of knowledge started.

If you argue, controversial issues use a reference to support your argument that adds credibility to your position. Your response to your peers work should be engaging and informative with good substance. Your responses should contribute in a meaningful way to helping advance our knowledge of the topics the class explores. There is help with proper APA Style formatting in the lessons and resource sections of the electronic classroom, which can be found on the menu bar on the course homepage. All postings should contribute and advance the class knowledge of the course themes.

Students are encouraged to "get out of the comfort zones" when making their arguments. The reason behind this activity allows students to analyze work from many different perspectives allowing the critical thinking process to grow. If you always stay in your comfort zone, you are not accepting of new ideas and concepts. Feel free to explore your theories and test them on the battlefield of peer review. Just make sure to include a scholarly reference to help support your argument.

See the rubric below. This is how your postings will be graded so make sure that you use the rubric to help guide your work.

Paper For Above instruction

The development and execution of a research proposal hinge significantly on the chosen methodological approach, which can be experimental or non-experimental. When planning research, it is crucial to decide which approach aligns best with the objectives of the study and the nature of the research questions. This paper discusses the considerations behind selecting an experimental or non-experimental approach and why a particular choice might be preferable in a given scenario.

Experimental research involves manipulating one or more independent variables to observe their effect on dependent variables. This approach is particularly useful when establishing cause-and-effect relationships. For instance, in examining the effectiveness of a new teaching strategy, an experimental approach allows for controlled manipulation and random assignment, minimizing confounding variables (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). The strength of experimental research lies in its capacity to provide robust evidence for causal inference, but it may face ethical and practical constraints, especially in social sciences where manipulating certain variables is not feasible or ethical.

On the other hand, non-experimental research encompasses observational, correlational, and descriptive studies where variables are not manipulated but rather observed as they naturally occur. This approach is often employed when experimental manipulation is impractical or unethical (Leedy & Ormrod, 2019). For example, when investigating phenomena such as social behaviors or natural disaster impacts, researchers rely on non-experimental designs to gather meaningful data without intervention. While non-experimental research can establish relationships among variables, it generally cannot determine causality with the same certainty as experimental studies.

In selecting the approach for a research proposal, researchers must consider the nature of the research questions they aim to answer. If the goal is to determine causality, an experimental design is often favored, provided ethical considerations are addressed (Polit & Beck, 2020). Conversely, if the research aims to explore relationships or describe phenomena in context, a non-experimental method may be more appropriate. The decision also depends on resource availability, ethical constraints, and the scope of the study.

For example, a researcher studying the impact of a new curriculum on student achievement might choose a quasi-experimental approach if randomization is infeasible, or a correlational design if the focus is on identifying relationships without manipulating variables. In contrast, to test the efficacy of a specific intervention, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) — a type of experimental approach — would be appropriate (Shadish, Cook, & Campbell, 2002).

Ultimately, the decision on whether to adopt an experimental or non-experimental approach should be grounded in the research questions, ethical standards, and practical considerations. A well-justified methodological choice enhances the validity and reliability of the study’s findings, thereby contributing valuable knowledge to the field.

References

• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2019). Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2020). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Wolters Kluwer.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.