In Chapter 4, The Author Describes Four Types Of Costs
In Chapter 4 The Author Describes Four Types Of Costs That Blockchain
In chapter 4, the author describes four types of costs that blockchain technology can reduce. Which of the four cost types, if reduced through blockchain technology, would most impact the organization for which you currently work? What would be the most visible impact on your job role? How could you minimize any negative impact? 1. Search Costs—How Do We Find New Talent and New Customers? 2. Contracting Costs—What Do We Agree to Do, Anyway? 3. Coordination Costs—How Should We All Work Together? 4. Costs of (Re-)Building Trust—Why Should We Trust One Another? Strictly follow the instruction. APA format. References are required Begin with a title page (1) Introduction Page (2) All written assignments must comply with APA Format. Any assignment that does not comply with the APA format will receive a point deduction. Assignments in this class have a minimum weighting on formatting using APA of 20%+. In-Text APA is required. A minimum of 3 paragraphs required for the weekly journal Conclusion Reference list.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Blockchain technology has revolutionized the way organizations manage costs associated with operations, trust, and collaboration. In analyzing the four types of costs described by the author—search costs, contracting costs, coordination costs, and trust rebuilding costs—it becomes evident that reducing specific costs can significantly impact organizational efficiency. For my current organization, which operates within a supply chain management context, the most impactful cost reduction would be in the area of coordination costs. This paper explores how blockchain can streamline collaborative processes, the implications for my role, and strategies to minimize potential negative effects of these technological shifts.
Main Body
Among the four cost categories, coordination costs—how organizations work together—are often among the most burdensome, especially in complex supply chains. Blockchain’s decentralized ledger provides an immutable record of transactions and provenance, fostering transparency and real-time data sharing among all stakeholders involved in the supply chain. By reducing the need for intermediary oversight and manual reconciliation, blockchain streamlines workflows and simplifies communication channels. As an employee involved in procurement and logistics, the adoption of blockchain would make processes faster and more transparent, directly affecting my daily tasks. The most visible impact on my role would be a reduction in the time required to verify supplier credentials and track shipment statuses, enabling more efficient decision-making and problem resolution.
Despite these benefits, implementing blockchain may introduce challenges such as technical complexity or resistance to change. To minimize negative impacts, proactive training and change management initiatives are essential. Educating team members about blockchain’s functions and benefits can ease adoption and reduce anxiety about job security or workflow disruptions. Additionally, integrating blockchain solutions with existing enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems can ensure smoother transitions and preserve organizational data integrity. By fostering an environment of continuous learning and demonstrating blockchain’s tangible benefits, organizations can mitigate potential setbacks and maximize productivity gains.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the reduction of coordination costs through blockchain technology holds substantial promise for improving organizational efficiency, especially in supply chain management. For my role, the most noticeable impact would be enhanced transparency and faster information sharing, leading to more agile operations. However, to ensure successful integration, it is crucial to address potential challenges with comprehensive training and thoughtful change management strategies. Ultimately, leveraging blockchain to minimize coordination costs can provide a competitive advantage and foster stronger collaboration within organizations.
References
- Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World. Portfolio.
- Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and Smart Contracts. IEEE Access, 4, 2292–2303. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2564538
- Mougayar, W. (2016). The Business Blockchain: Promise, Practice, and Application of the Next Internet Technology. Wiley.
- Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O'Reilly Media.
- Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2016). Some Simple Economics of the Blockchain. NBER Working Paper No. 22952. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22952
- Saberi, S., et al. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135.
- Yli-Huumo, J., et al. (2016). Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review. PLOS ONE, 11(10), e0163477.
- Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and Smart Contracts. IEEE Access, 4, 2292–2303.
- Peters, G. W., & Panayi, E. (2016). Understanding Modern Banking Ledgers Through Blockchain Technologies: Future of Record Keeping and Settlements. Banking & Finance Review, 8(2), 22–31.
- Möser, M., et al. (2013). An Inquiry into Money Laundering Tools in the Bitcoin Ecosystem. IEEE Security & Privacy, 11(4), 36–44.