In Many Ways The Network Of Relationships To Share Strengths

In Many Ways Thenetwork Of Relationshipsto Share Strengths And Resources

In many ways, the network of relationships to share strengths and resources to meet needs is a community's greatest asset. Leveraging the existing community web in the planned change process can often be more sustainable and work toward the goals of empowerment and social justice. For this discussion, please answer the following questions: In the activity, several tangible and intangible assets were shared across this community. How did the activity expand your ideas of assets that could be utilized in a planned change process? Or, if it didn't expand your ideas, how can services make better use of the assets already in client communities? Describe an example of a service organization (any type: clinical, advocacy, basic needs, justice, health related, etc.) that in some way strengthens networks of relationships to leverage community or organizational assets.

Paper For Above instruction

The recognition of a community’s network of relationships as a vital asset in planned change processes underscores the importance of social capital in community development and social work. The activity in question, which highlighted the sharing of tangible and intangible assets, broadened my understanding of how community strengths extend beyond physical resources and infrastructure to include social ties, trust, knowledge, and cultural values. These intangible assets often serve as the backbone for sustainable community initiatives, fostering resilience and collective efficacy.

Traditionally, planned change efforts might focus predominantly on tangible resources such as funding, physical infrastructure, or access to services. However, the activity demonstrated how intangible assets—such as community trust, social networks, civic engagement, and shared cultural identity—are equally vital in achieving meaningful and lasting change. For instance, community trust facilitates cooperation and cooperation reduces resistance to change, while social networks serve as conduits for information dissemination and mobilization.

This expanded perspective emphasizes the importance of leveraging existing community assets in ways that are sustainable and empowering. As an example, service providers can engage community members not merely as recipients of aid but as active partners. An effective approach might involve mapping community assets—identifying key individuals, groups, local organizations, and informal networks—then integrating these into the broader change strategy.

A real-world example of a service organization strengthening networks to leverage community assets is the local health clinic connected with a community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative. This clinic not only provides essential health services but actively collaborates with community leaders, faith-based organizations, schools, and local advocacy groups to address public health issues, such as diabetes or mental health disparities. By building strong relationships among these diverse stakeholders, the clinic fosters an environment where trust and shared responsibility flourish.

This organization employs community health workers who are drawn from within the community, acting as liaisons to facilitate communication and engagement. These workers leverage their relationships and cultural understanding to promote health education, encourage utilization of services, and gather community insights to inform health interventions. The result is an integrated network that amplifies the community’s internal strengths and addresses health inequities more effectively.

Another example is advocacy organizations that work to empower marginalized populations by strengthening social ties and building community capacity. These organizations often serve as catalysts for change by creating spaces for dialogue, fostering peer support, and facilitating community-led initiatives. Through these efforts, the networks of relationships become a resource in their own right, enabling the community to advocate for policy changes and access services more effectively.

Enhancing the utilization of existing community assets requires intentional strategies; organizations must actively listen to the community, recognize and validate local leadership, and develop participatory approaches that utilize the community’s strengths. This can mean training community members as peer educators, establishing advisory councils with community representatives, or creating collaborative platforms where different stakeholders can coordinate efforts.

In conclusion, expanding ideas around community assets involves valuing both tangible and intangible resources and fostering strong networks of relationships. Service organizations that intentionally cultivate these relationships—through collaboration, cultural competence, and community engagement—can leverage the full spectrum of community strengths to promote sustainable change. This approach not only enhances effectiveness but also upholds the principles of empowerment and social justice integral to community development.

References

• Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843-857.
• Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing community assets. ACTA Publications.
• Green, G. P., & Haines, A. (2012). Asset Building & Community Development. Sage Publications.
• Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. (1993). Building Communities from the Inside Out. ACTA Publications.
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster.
• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.
• Israel, B., Eng, E., Schulz, A., & Parker, E. (2013). Methods for community-based participatory research for health. Jossey-Bass.
• Mattessich, P., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, B. (2001). Collaboration: What Makes It Work. Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
• Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2010). Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, 100(S1), S40-S46.
• Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599.