In This Video Dr Greg Martin Provides An Introduction To Res

In This Video Dr Greg Martin Provides An Introduction To Research Me

In this discussion, you are asked to reflect on your proposed research topic, critique a related healthcare article, and prepare for your final assignment. Specifically, you need to state your research topic and reasoning, critique a scholarly article related to that topic—including its research questions, methodology, major findings, strengths, and weaknesses—and then reply to a classmate’s post with a substantive response that builds on their ideas, supported by credible sources.

Paper For Above instruction

The core of this assignment involves developing a comprehensive understanding of research methodology within the context of your chosen healthcare topic. This begins with clearly defining your research question or problem, which sets the foundation for your entire study. The reasoning behind your chosen topic should reflect its relevance to current issues in healthcare, potential impact, or gaps in existing literature, aligning with principles outlined in Modules 1 and 2 on identifying research questions and selecting appropriate study designs. A well-justified research topic will demonstrate awareness of the field and identify an area where contribution or insight is needed.

Following this, you are required to critique a scholarly article related to your research topic. The critique must submit a detailed analysis of the article, starting with a complete APA citation. The critique should analyze the research questions or hypotheses, which clarify the study's purpose and what the researchers aimed to discover or test. The major theories explored in the article should be succinctly summarized—these could include models of health behavior, psychological theories, or healthcare delivery frameworks—and their relevance to the study.

The methodology section of your critique should describe the sample size and selection, as well as the independent and dependent variables, including how these were measured. This detail is crucial for assessing the validity and reliability of the findings. A thorough summary of the major results should follow, highlighting the key outcomes, statistical significance, and practical implications.

The contribution of the study to its field should be clearly articulated—what new insights or applications does it offer? Your evaluation should also weigh the methodological strengths of the study, such as robust sampling techniques, appropriate measures, and clear procedures, against methodological weaknesses like small sample sizes, potential biases, or measurement limitations.

Including the article's link in APA format is essential for transparency and reference. The critique should focus on how the article's findings and methodology relate to your research interest, demonstrating critical engagement with the scholarly literature.

Lastly, you are expected to respond to a peer's post thoughtfully. Your reply should be respectful, at least 150 words, and should extend the discussion by supporting or challenging their points with credible facts, asking probing questions, or adding new perspectives. Your response should cite at least one credible source and include the same APA formatting challenges as in your initial critique.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
• Robson, C. (2011). Real world research (3rd ed.). Wiley.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
• Fink, A. (2015). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide. Sage Publications.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2020). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Hash, K. M., & Gibbs, G. (2017). Contexts and social phenomena: Applying qualitative research strategies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-9.