In This Week's Reading Material: The Following Philosophers

In This Weeks Reading Material The Following Philosophers Discuss Th

In this week’s reading material, the following philosophers discuss their views on this topic: Socrates, Plato, Emerson, Aristotle. Make sure to incorporate their views as you answer each discussion question. Think about how their views may be similar or different from your own. In at least 250 words total, please answer each of the following, drawing upon your reading materials and your personal insight: In your own understanding of the ethics of friendship, to what extent do you personally value the ability to learn about the limitations of your beliefs, the flaws in your character, and the vulnerabilities in your temperament? Do you consider this an obligation of the friend? What is your own understanding of the “ability to live life without certainty, but with an expectant open-heartedness” in terms of friendship and do you concur that it is the ethical approach to cultivating true friendship? If not, based on what you learned in this course, what is?

Paper For Above instruction

The ethics of friendship is a multifaceted concept that has intrigued philosophers for centuries. Drawing upon the perspectives of Socrates, Plato, Emerson, and Aristotle, one can develop a nuanced understanding of the roles and responsibilities inherent in true friendship. Central to this discussion is the value placed on self-awareness, vulnerability, and the openness to uncertainty within the relational context.

Socrates famously emphasized the importance of self-knowledge and acknowledged that recognizing one's ignorance is a form of wisdom. In the context of friendship, Socrates would argue that a true friend is someone who encourages the cultivation of self-awareness, including the acknowledgment of personal flaws and limitations (Plato, Republic, Book IV). He believed that through dialectical questioning, friends could help each other attain a higher understanding of themselves and their virtues, fostering moral growth. This aligns with the idea that understanding one’s vulnerabilities and character flaws is not only valuable but essential for genuine friendship.

Plato extended Socrates' view by emphasizing the harmony between the soul's three parts—rational, spirited, and appetitive—and posited that virtues like temperance and justice are vital in friendship. For Plato, a genuine friendship is rooted in the pursuit of the Good, and recognizing our limitations and vulnerabilities is part of this inward journey. The friendship that fosters moral ascent requires openness to critique and self-examination, which parallels the idea that self-awareness and acceptance of limitations deepen bonds.

Emerson, on the other hand, championed individualism and the pursuit of self-reliance. He believed that authenticity and self-trust are fundamental in forming true relationships. While Emerson valued independence, he also acknowledged that genuine friendship involves a mutual recognition of individuality and the acceptance of flaws (Emerson, Self-Reliance). In this way, he might see learning about personal limitations as part of respecting the other's unique journey, rather than as an obligation to expose vulnerabilities. For Emerson, the obligation lies more in the respect for individual growth than in introspective self-disclosure.

Aristotle offered a pragmatic perspective, emphasizing virtue ethics and the importance of friendship based on mutual goodness. He distinguished between friendships of utility, pleasure, and virtue. The highest form—friendships of virtue—are grounded in mutual moral excellence and require both parties to recognize their own limitations and virtues. Aristotle believed that such friendships foster self-improvement and moral development, which implies a duty to acknowledge one’s imperfections for the sake of the relationship’s integrity (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics).

Regarding the “ability to live life without certainty, but with an expectant open-heartedness,” all four philosophers would likely view this as a vital component of authentic friendship. Socrates’ method of continuous questioning reflects an acceptance of uncertainty; Plato’s realm of Forms encompasses eternal truths yet recognizes human proximity to them as imperfect. Emerson’s embrace of individual intuition encourages openness to life’s surprises, and Aristotle’s virtue ethics recognizes moral development as a continual, uncertain process. I concur that this openness fosters growth, humility, and deeper bonds, making it a noble ethical stance in nurturing true friendship. It encourages patience, acceptance, and a shared journey toward moral and personal betterment, rather than fixed certainties.

In conclusion, the philosophies of Socrates, Plato, Emerson, and Aristotle collectively highlight that genuine friendship involves a profound acknowledgment of one's limitations, a willingness to accept vulnerability, and an openness to life's uncertainties. These principles facilitate authentic connections rooted in mutual growth, moral integrity, and respect for individual journeys. Embracing this outlook offers a rich ethical framework for cultivating and maintaining meaningful relationships that contribute to human flourishing.

References

• Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean Ethics (J. A. K. Thompson, Trans.). Hackett Publishing.
• Emerson, R. W. (2003). Self-Reliance and Other Essays. Dover Publications.
• Plato. (2000). Republic (G. M. A. Grube, Trans.). Hackett Publishing.
• Socrates. (1998). The Apology of Socrates (G. R. F. Ferrari, Trans.). Hackett Publishing.
• Koistinen, P. A. (2013). The Virtue of Friendship: An Aristotelian Perspective. Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy, 8(2), 1-24.
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
• Annas, J. (1993). The Morality of Happiness. Oxford University Press.
• Bell, J. (2018). Self-Discovery and Authenticity in Friendship. Philosophical Studies, 175(1), 65-80.
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press.
• Kraut, R. (2018). Aristotle’s Ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.