Income Statement Walmart Inc. Period Ending 3

Income Statementwal Mart Incincome Statementsperiod Ending 31 Jan 1

The assignment requires conducting a comprehensive financial statement analysis of Wal-Mart Inc. for the fiscal years ending January 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015. The analysis encompasses calculating and interpreting liquidity ratios (current and quick ratios), profitability ratios (return on equity, return on assets, operating pre-tax margin, net profit margin), and market ratios (earnings per share and price-to-earnings ratio). The objective is to evaluate Wal-Mart’s financial health, operational efficiency, and market performance over the specified period, based on provided financial statements, including income statements and balance sheets.

Paper For Above instruction

Financial statement analysis is an essential tool for stakeholders to evaluate a company's economic stability and operational efficiency. In this analysis, I focus on Wal-Mart Inc., examining its financial performance over the years 2013 through 2015. The evaluation involves assessing liquidity, profitability, and market ratios based on provided income statements and balance sheets. These ratios offer insights into the company's ability to meet short-term obligations, generate profits, and sustain investor confidence.

Liquidity Analysis

Liquidity ratios gauge Wal-Mart’s capacity to cover its short-term liabilities with its short-term assets. The current ratio, calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities, declined from 0.97 in 2013 to 0.83 in 2015. This downward trend indicates that Wal-Mart's ability to satisfy its short-term obligations has weakened, raising concern about liquidity stress. A current ratio below 1.0 suggests potential liquidity issues, which could impact the company's operational resilience if not addressed.

The quick ratio, which excludes inventory from current assets to focus on the most liquid assets, decreased from 0.28 in 2013 to 0.22 in 2015. This further confirms the limited liquidity position and highlights that Wal-Mart’s immediate assets sufficient to cover current liabilities are inadequate. To enhance liquidity, Wal-Mart might consider increasing liquid assets or restructuring short-term liabilities, such as negotiating longer payment terms with suppliers or reducing short-term debt.

Receivables and Payables Turnover

Accounts receivable turnover improved in 2015 to 71.24, indicating that Wal-Mart collects receivables more efficiently, which is positive for cash flow management. Conversely, accounts payable turnover remained low, at 0.11 in 2015, suggesting slower payments to creditors. High receivable turnover coupled with low payable turnover may imply strategic management of cash flows but could also signal strained supplier relationships if payments are delayed excessively.

Profitability Analysis

Profitability ratios assess how effectively Wal-Mart utilizes its resources to generate earnings. Return on equity (ROE) exhibited stability, increasing marginally from 20% in 2013 to 22% in 2015. This indicates that shareholders' equity is producing consistent returns, reflecting positively on management performance. Return on assets (ROA) remained constant at 8%, showing the efficiency of asset utilization did not significantly change.

The operating pre-tax margin increased slightly from 5.59% to 5.92%, and the net profit margin rose from 3.46% to 3.78% over the three years. These marginal improvements suggest Wal-Mart improved its operational efficiency and profitability, translating sales into earnings more effectively. Such consistent gains bolster investor confidence and imply that the company is managing its operations adeptly.

Market Ratios

Market ratios reflect investor perceptions and valuation of Wal-Mart’s stock. Earnings per share (EPS) increased from $1.17 in 2013 to $1.21 in 2015, indicating growing profitability on a per-share basis. The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio declined from 8.55 to 6.61, implying that investors are willing to pay less per dollar of earnings over this period, which could suggest market saturation or increased competition affecting stock valuation.

Given the stock price of $10.00, $9.00, and $8.00 in respective years, the declining P/E ratio despite rising EPS suggests a cautious or skeptical market sentiment. This may be due to broader economic conditions, industry-specific risks, or company-specific factors that investors perceive as impacting future growth prospects.

Conclusion

Analyzing Wal-Mart’s financial data over these three years reveals mixed signals. While profitability ratios have modestly improved, indicating operational efficiency and profitability, liquidity has weakened, highlighting potential short-term cash flow concerns. The decline in P/E ratio suggests a cautious market outlook. To sustain growth and financial health, Wal-Mart should focus on strengthening liquidity by enhancing cash reserves and optimizing working capital management. Continuous monitoring of these ratios is vital for stakeholders to make informed investment and managerial decisions.

References

• Eakins, S., & McNally, W. (2013). Corporate Finance Online. 1st Edition. Retrieved from VitalSource Bookshelf Online.
• Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory & Practice. Cengage Learning.
• Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Graham, J. R., & Dodd, D. L. (2008). Security Analysis. McGraw-Hill.
• White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2003). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. Wiley.
• Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Wiley.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (2019). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Skinner, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (2016). Essentials of Financial Accounting. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.