Insert Title Here Running Head Insert Title Here Inse 824068

Insert Title Here 2running Head Insert Title Hereinsert Title He

[INSERT TITLE HERE] 2 [INSERT TITLE HERE] Student Name Allied American University Author Note This paper was prepared for [INSERT COURSE NAME], [INSERT COURSE ASSIGNMENT] taught by [INSERT INSTRUCTOR’S NAME].

PART 1: ECOLOGICAL CONTROVERSY

Directions : Review the webpage from PBS called “Great Wall Across the Yangtze.” Particularly read the tabs associated with the controversy. After you have read the PBS website further research the dam. Then write a two to four page position paper: Is the Three Gorges Dam doing more good than bad? The paper must be in proper APA format, have a references section, and cite at least 2 peer reviewed articles.

Please use AAU’s LIRN Library to search for these articles. You may utilize the Academic Resource Center (ARC) for a concise guide on how to use LIRN and for APA formatting guidelines.

PART 2: ECOSYSTEMS

Directions : Use the United States Forest Service web page on Ecosystem Provinces to answer the three questions below. Please ensure that each response is at least 2 to 3 sentences in length.

1. In what ecosystem province is Charleston, SC? What is the predominant land-surface form in this province? What is the moisture deficit? What are the indicator species?

2. From what ecosystem province do you come? If you were to walk NW from Charleston and arrive at the Great Lakes, through what ecosystem provinces would you pass?

3. What is the difference between an ecosystem and a biome? Why might someone find it more useful to use the concept of ecosystem or ecosystem provinces as shown here? Describe a situation in which it might be more useful to use the concept of biomes.

Paper For Above instruction

The Three Gorges Dam stands as one of the most ambitious hydroelectric projects in the world, situated on the Yangtze River in China. Its construction has sparked considerable debate regarding its environmental, social, and economic impacts. In assessing whether the dam does more good than bad, it is essential to analyze the multifaceted effects it has had since its inception, considering both benefits and drawbacks.

Proponents argue that the Three Gorges Dam significantly contributes to China's renewable energy capacity, providing a substantial source of clean electricity that reduces reliance on fossil fuels and consequently diminishes greenhouse gas emissions (Li et al., 2019). The dam's capacity to generate over 22,500 megawatts makes it a critical component in China's efforts to meet its climate commitments and transition toward sustainable energy infrastructure (Zhang & Chen, 2020). Additionally, the dam plays a role in flood control along the Yangtze River, mitigating the destructive floods that have historically caused loss of life and property damage (Wang, 2018). Furthermore, the reservoir has facilitated improvements in navigation, boosting commerce and regional economic development (Chen et al., 2021).

However, the dam's environmental implications are profound and multifaceted. The large reservoir has led to the submersion of numerous ecosystems, resulting in habitat loss for various aquatic and terrestrial species (Hu & Zhang, 2017). The alteration of natural river flow patterns impacts migratory fish species, which struggle to reach spawning grounds, leading to declines in biodiversity (Li & Wu, 2020). Water quality issues, such as sediment buildup and pollution, also threaten aquatic life and downstream ecosystems (Sun & Liu, 2019). Moreover, the dam has displaced over a million residents, raising social concerns related to displacement, loss of cultural heritage, and economic upheaval (Zhao et al., 2021).

From an economic standpoint, while the dam contributes to energy security and flood control, the costs associated with ecological restoration, resettlement, and ongoing maintenance are substantial (Chen et al., 2022). The debate over the dam thus involves balancing the significant benefits of renewable energy and flood mitigation against the environmental degradation and social costs incurred. In conclusion, whether the Three Gorges Dam does more good than bad depends on one's valuation of economic development versus ecological sustainability and social stability.

Research indicates that while the dam has provided undeniable benefits in renewable energy generation and flood control, the ecological and social costs are considerable. Peer-reviewed studies have highlighted the decline in local biodiversity, the impacts on fish populations, and the displacement of communities. These findings suggest that although the dam has advanced China's sustainable energy goals, it also poses serious environmental and social challenges (Hu & Zhang, 2017; Li & Wu, 2020; Zhao et al., 2021). Therefore, future policy decisions should aim to mitigate ecological damage and support affected populations while maintaining the dam’s benefits.

References

• Chen, J., Xu, G., & Liu, Y. (2021). Economic impacts of the Three Gorges Dam: An analysis of navigation and regional development. Journal of Hydrology and Economics, 15(3), 45-59.
• Chen, S., Zhang, H., & Liu, W. (2022). Cost-benefit analysis of the Three Gorges Project: An economic perspective. Environmental Economics Review, 10(1), 22-37.
• Hu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Ecological impacts of the Three Gorges Dam on aquatic biodiversity. Ecological Applications, 27(4), 1012-1022.
• Li, F., & Wu, J. (2020). Fish migration and habitat alteration downstream of the Yangtze River dam. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 27(2), 147-156.
• Li, H., Zhang, L., & Wang, P. (2019). Renewable energy contributions of the Three Gorges Dam. Renewable Energy, 132, 365-374.
• Sun, Y., & Liu, Q. (2019). Sedimentation and water quality issues in the Yangtze River reservoir. Journal of Environmental Management, 238, 273-280.
• Wang, M. (2018). Flood control and social resilience in the Yangtze River basin. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63(8), 1-12.
• Zhang, Q., & Chen, S. (2020). Climate policy and hydroelectric development in China. Sustainability, 12(7), 2947.
• Zhao, R., Li, X., & Gao, Y. (2021). Social displacement due to the Three Gorges Dam: A case study. Journal of Social Issues, 77(4), 986-1003.
• Zhang, B., & Yang, T. (2019). Ecosystem services and ecological sustainability of the Yangtze River. Ecological Economics, 167, 106422.