Institution Name Competitors In The Market The Main Competit

Institution Name Competitors in the market The main competitors in T

Investing in the furniture industry requires a thorough understanding of existing market competitors, their strengths, weaknesses, and strategic positioning. Two prominent companies exemplify significant competitive forces in this sector: IKEA and Anees Upholstery. This analysis explores their market presence, strengths, weaknesses, and strategic implications for potential entrants or new businesses aiming to capture market share.

Internationally recognized for its innovative approach to furniture retail, IKEA has established a dominant market position through its cost leadership, extensive supply chains, and wide-ranging product offerings, including ready-to-assemble furniture. IKEA's unique business model capitalizes on economies of scale and a broad target consumer base, spanning various income levels and geographic regions (Lewis, 2005). Conversely, Anees Upholstery specializes in high-end, bespoke furniture characterized by unique craftsmanship and aesthetic appeal. Its market niche appeals mainly to affluent customers seeking luxury and exclusivity, positioning the company differently from IKEA's mass-market focus.

The competitive landscape highlights the importance of SWOT analyses for these firms. IKEA's strengths include understanding consumer needs, cost efficiencies, and robust supply chain management, enabling it to offer affordable products on a global scale. However, its weaknesses involve potential compromises on quality due to cost-cutting, which could damage brand reputation (Lawler, 2007). Opportunities for IKEA involve expanding online retail channels and growing economies, whereas its primary threat stems from increasing competition and market saturation.

On the other hand, Anees Upholstery's strengths lie in its reputation for unique, high-quality, handcrafted furniture. Its weaknesses involve high production costs, limiting its scalability and price competitiveness (Ismail et al., 2017). Its market is mainly composed of high-income earners prioritizing quality over price. The main threats include intensified competition from emerging luxury furniture brands offering similar products at lower costs, thereby challenging Anees Upholstery’s market share.

For a new entrant aiming to succeed amidst these formidable competitors, strategies must leverage their weaknesses and differentiate uniquely. A critical issue is understanding why these companies are direct competitors: they operate within the same industry, targeting overlapping customer segments, with product lines that can substitute for each other depending on consumer preferences and income levels. Their competitive advantages—cost leadership for IKEA and product differentiation for Anees Upholstery—shape their strategies (Porter, 1985).

Implementing a cooperative strategy with either competitor could be advantageous. For instance, partnering with IKEA might facilitate access to global supply chains and established distribution networks, reducing entry barriers. Conversely, collaborating with Anees Upholstery could allow for sharing high-end craftsmanship expertise or co-developing luxury collections that appeal to niche markets. Such alliances can minimize market entry risks, expand product portfolios, and enhance brand credibility. Moreover, cooperation could foster a healthy competitive environment that stimulates innovation and customer value creation.

Building a competitive market profile requires strategic positioning and brand differentiation. Product differentiation, leveraging quality, design, and customer experience, can enable a new business to carve out a distinctive space. Offering customizable or eco-friendly furniture could attract environmentally conscious consumers. Additionally, adopting innovative marketing strategies, such as social media engagement and e-commerce platforms, broadens reach and enhances customer engagement (Kotler & Keller, 2016).

The balanced scorecard (BSC) is a strategic management tool that aligns business activities with the broader vision and strategic objectives. It encompasses four perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth. Implementing BSC ensures that strategic initiatives—such as expanding market share, improving product quality, or enhancing customer satisfaction—are measurable and aligned with organizational goals (Roberts, 2004). For a furniture business, this entails setting specific targets for sales growth, customer loyalty, production efficiency, and innovation, monitored through key performance indicators.

References

• Lewis, E. (2005). Great Ikea!: a brand for all the people. Cyan Communications.
• Lawler, E. E. (2007). Built to change: How to achieve sustained organizational effectiveness. Strategic Direction, 23(4).
• Ismail, S., Rahman, A. A. A., Ismail, A. R., Daud, K. A. M., & Khidzir, N. Z. (2017). Internet marketing strategy for furniture industry: A research based ergonomics sofa. In Advances in Human Factors, Business Management, Training and Education (pp.). Springer, Cham.
• Roberts, M. L., Albright, T. L., & Hibbets, A. R. (2004). Debiasing balanced scorecard evaluations. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 16(1), 75-88.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
• Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Sivitanides, P. (2017). Retail market analysis for development projects. Routledge.
• Wankel, C. (2010). Alleviating poverty through business strategy: Global case studies in social entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Saee, J. (2012). Contemporary corporate strategy: Global perspectives. Routledge.
• Wancle, C. (2011). Global economic strategies and market considerations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.