Integrated Distributors Inc. Scenario: IDI Is ✓ Solved

Integrated Distributors Incorporated (IDI) scenario: IDI is

Integrated Distributors Incorporated (IDI) scenario: IDI is a publicly traded logistics company headquartered in Billings, Montana with more than 3,000 employees across multiple countries. Current core infrastructure is outdated, patch levels neglected, and multiple compromises occurred through a JV site. The CIO has funded an infrastructure assessment to standardize hardware and software across sites (excluding JVs/SAs) to support 10–15% annual growth for seven years and a 3–4-year technology refresh cycle.

Assignment: Assess the current IT infrastructure and security posture using the scenario details below and develop a multi-year, phased infrastructure upgrade and security improvement plan. The plan must address standardization of servers/workstations and office software, patch management, network segmentation, WAN and telecom upgrades, application consolidation/integration (Logisuite, Oracle, RouteSim, SAP where applicable), virtualization and storage strategy, BYOD and mobile device controls, incident response and access controls, and prioritized remediation steps to reduce confidentiality, integrity, and availability risks. Include implementation phases, risk reduction measures, and resource/priority recommendations.

Essential scenario details:

  • Data center inventory: 14 HP UNIX servers (4 OS 8.5; 4 OS 9.x; 6 OS 11.x), 75 Microsoft Windows 2003 servers (production/test/dev), 5 application servers, 5 Exchange servers.
  • Core applications: Microsoft Exchange; Oracle financials; Logisuite 4.2.2 (10-year-old, 350+ modifications, expired support); RouteSim (not integrated); various office automation packages and mixed workstations at HQ (600 workstations: 200 HP, 150 Toshiba, 175 IBM, 50 Dell, rest Apple PowerBook).
  • WAN: original MCI-designed WAN, bandwidth insufficient during peak seasons; PABX telecom systems aged (Mitel SX-2000 at HQ; NEC NEAX 2400 in Sao Paulo; Siemens Saturn in Warsaw).
  • Site specifics: Sao Paulo exemplifies good standardization (Windows servers, Linux app servers, EMC CLARiiON SAN, SAP R/3, Lenovo laptops, up-to-date policies in Spanish) but uses a weak common VPN password and lacks anti-malware; Warsaw has many Windows servers, legacy freight forwarding and finance systems that don't interface, public wireless with WPA and no password, and weak local staff controls.

Deliverable: A 1000-word report with phased recommendations, security controls, and prioritized remediation steps that will bring IDI into compliance with enterprise security best practices and support projected growth.

Paper For Above Instructions

Executive summary

IDI’s infrastructure risk stems from fragmented standards, aging systems, unsupported software, weak access controls, and insufficient network capacity. Immediate stabilization and a coordinated multi-year modernization roadmap are required to reduce confidentiality, integrity, and availability risks while supporting 10–15% annual growth and a 3–4-year refresh cadence. This plan recommends prioritized controls (patch management, segmentation, MFA, network upgrades), consolidation using virtualization and storage modernization, application rationalization and integration, and governance measures to sustain improvements (NIST SP 800-53; CIS Controls) (NIST, 2013; CIS, 2021).

Assessment findings (condensed)

1) Data center risk: Multiple UNIX variants and Windows Server 2003 are unsupported and present critical vulnerabilities. Legacy Logisuite with 350+ modifications and expired support is a critical single-point risk. Exchange and Oracle instances lack a documented patch and change-management baseline (NIST SP 800-30) (NIST, 2012).

2) Network and WAN: Original MCI WAN design is capacity-constrained and lacks modern QoS, redundancy, and secure VPN practices; JV-connected Internet site previously led to compromise, indicating insufficient partner enclave controls and monitoring (Cisco best practices) (Cisco, 2018).

3) Endpoints and standardization: HQ’s heterogeneous workstations and office software create productivity and security friction and raise malware and data-loss risks; BYOD and executive devices are unmanaged (NIST SP 800-124) (NIST, 2013b).

4) Site variances: Sao Paulo shows good hardware and SAN usage and SAP presence, but operational security gaps (common VPN password, no anti-malware). Warsaw has exposed wireless, legacy apps not integrated with finance, and weak staffing controls leading to potential fraud vectors.

Multi-year, phased plan

Phase 0 — Immediate (0–3 months): containment and stabilization

  • Isolate JV/SAs access and apply network segmentation to remove insecure partner access to core systems; implement temporary access controls and restricted enclaves (CIS Control 14) (CIS, 2021).
  • Deploy centralized logging and SIEM for detection of compromises, and enable basic alerting and retention for forensic follow-up (NIST SP 800-92) (Kent et al., 2006).
  • Enforce emergency patching on exposed hosts (critical/known exploited vulnerabilities), deploy enterprise AV/endpoint detection and response (EDR) across all offices, and revoke the shared VPN password in Sao Paulo; require unique credentials and immediate MFA for all VPN accounts (NIST SP 800-53).
  • Introduce a formal change control and asset inventory tied to a CMDB to track hardware/software and lifecycle.

Phase 1 — Short term (3–12 months): foundational modernization and standardization

  • Patch management program and vulnerability scanning (automated baseline checks) per NIST guidance; prioritize Windows Server 2003 remediation—either upgrade, migrate workloads to virtualized hosts, or isolate/decommission (NIST SP 800-40) (NIST, 2002).
  • Standardize workstation and office suites at HQ around a selected image (e.g., modern Windows 10/11 or macOS with Office 365) and deploy centralized patching, endpoint encryption, and MDM for executive devices (NIST SP 800-124).
  • Network segmentation: logical VLANS for production, test, development, partner/JV enclaves, and guest Wi‑Fi with strong authentication and WPA2/WPA3 Enterprise; apply firewall policies and internal IDS/IPS (CIS Controls 12–14) (CIS, 2021).
  • Apply IAM improvements: centralized Active Directory/Azure AD with role-based access control, privileged access management, and MFA for administrative accounts.

Phase 2 — Medium term (12–24 months): consolidation, integration, and resiliency

  • Virtualize aging servers and migrate to a modern hypervisor platform (VMware/Hyper‑V) to reduce hardware sprawl and enable standardized patch cycles; move to supported OS versions (VMware best practices) (VMware, 2017).
  • Implement SAN modernization (leverage EMC CLARiiON replacement or upgrade to current Dell EMC arrays) with snapshot and replication strategies for DR and business continuity (Dell EMC, 2015).
  • Application rationalization: assess Logisuite upgrade vs. replacement. Given heavy customization and expired support, implement a migration plan—either re-engineer into Oracle-based modules or isolate via API/middleware to minimize risk while retaining business logic (enterprise architecture patterns) (Ross et al., 2006).
  • Integrate RouteSim with Oracle/financials through middleware or ETL to enable real-time costing and profitability analysis, improving operational ROI.

Phase 3 — Long term (24–48+ months): optimization and continuous improvement

  • WAN modernization: move to SD‑WAN to optimize traffic, provide dynamic path selection, increase resilience, and apply centralized security policies; implement QoS for peak-season traffic and e‑commerce sessions (Cisco SD‑WAN guidance) (Cisco, 2019).
  • Replace aged telecom PABX with unified communications platform (VoIP) integrated with CRM/customer databases and secure RTP/TLS to improve call management and support remote work.
  • Formalize governance: adopt ISO/IEC 27001-aligned Information Security Management System (ISMS) and continuous monitoring with KPIs for patch compliance, mean time to remediate, and incident response readiness (ISO/IEC 27001) (ISO, 2013).

Risk reduction measures and priorities

Top priorities: (1) eliminate unsupported OS and apply emergency segmentation for legacy systems; (2) remove the JV/partner attack surface and strengthen inter‑partner controls; (3) deploy enterprise patching and endpoint EDR; (4) secure remote access with per-user credentials and MFA; (5) upgrade WAN capacity and implement SD‑WAN/QoS for peak season resilience. These steps reduce immediate exploitability and improve availability and confidentiality (NIST SP 800-53; CIS Controls) (NIST, 2013; CIS, 2021).

Resource and governance recommendations

Establish a cross-functional governance board led by the CIO with site leads for Sao Paulo and Warsaw. Invest first in people (security engineers, network architects) and tooling (SIEM, patch automation, MDM, SD‑WAN) before full hardware refresh. Use phased capital expenditures aligned to the 3–4-year refresh cycle and track ROI via reduced incidents and improved uptime metrics.

Conclusion

A focused, phased program that stabilizes the environment, standardizes platforms, consolidates workloads, upgrades networking and telecom, and enforces strong access and endpoint controls will reduce IDI’s risk profile while enabling the planned growth. Implementation guided by NIST and CIS best practices, combined with application rationalization and SD‑WAN adoption, will deliver measurable security and operational benefits over the next three to four years (NIST, CIS, ISO guidance).

References

  • NIST. (2012). NIST Special Publication 800-30 Rev. 1: Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (NIST SP 800-30).
  • NIST. (2013). NIST Special Publication 800-53: Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • NIST. (2002). NIST Special Publication 800-40: Guide to Enterprise Patch Management Technologies. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • NIST. (2013b). NIST Special Publication 800-124 Rev. 1: Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices in the Enterprise. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • CIS. (2021). Center for Internet Security Controls v8. Center for Internet Security.
  • ISO/IEC. (2013). ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Information Security Management Systems — Requirements. International Organization for Standardization.
  • Cisco. (2018). Best Practices for Securing Your WAN and VPN. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • Cisco. (2019). SD-WAN Design and Deployment Guide. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • VMware. (2017). Server Consolidation and Virtualization Best Practices. VMware, Inc.
  • Dell EMC. (2015). EMC CLARiiON Best Practices and Data Protection Guide. Dell EMC.

Related Assignments