Integrative Personality Theory For Your Final Paper

Integrative Personality Theoryfor Your Final Paper You Will Complete

Integrative Personality Theory for your final paper, you will complete the rest of the assignment which you began in week three and create your own theory of personality development by synthesizing the concepts and constructs of all the theories that seem most accurate and appropriate to you and by using those concepts to reflect on your own personality and development. Remember to use the template provided to guide you through the steps. Research a minimum of eight scholarly sources related to these concepts in the Ashford University Library to support your statements in the paper. Popular websites and your textbook may augment, but they will not count toward, the minimum number of sources needed for the paper.

The following content and headings must be included in your paper. Please visit the Ashford Writing Center for guidance on how to format headings in APA Style. Also, please take note of the suggestions provided for the length for each section in the instructions below.

Instructions: Provide a general introduction to the topic of theories of personality. Explain what you plan to cover and describe the direction your paper will take.

This section will not feature a heading, and it will be approximately two to three paragraphs. Major Concepts In this section, you will present the seven specific concepts identified from the seven models you think best apply to the study of personality in distinct subheadings. For each concept, identify the major personality model from which the concept was taken as well as the theorist associated with that model. This completed section will be approximately four to five pages. Excluded Concepts In this section, present the concepts you have chosen to exclude in your theory of personality development.

Reflect on the basic assumptions that define personality and identify three specific excluded concepts from any of the theories studied in the course. For each of the excluded concepts, provide a rationale explaining the various aspects of the concept that make it unsuitable for your use. This section will be approximately one to two pages. The Differences between Healthy and Unhealthy Personalities Describe the basic differences between healthy and unhealthy personality, based on the concepts that you have chosen to include and exclude from your theory. This completed section will be approximately one page.

The Roles of Heredity, the Environment, and Epigenetics Provide your analysis of the roles heredity, the environment, and epigenetics play in the development of personality. Discuss how heredity and the environment might affect personality disorders. This completed section will be approximately one page. Assessment and Measurement of the Theory Reflect on the major concepts you have selected for inclusion and provide a brief description about how those concepts are measured and/or assessed. Review the assessment sections of each chapter and discuss those measures you think are most applicable and effective.

This completed section will be approximately one page. Self-Reflection In this section of the paper, review the self-reflection you wrote in Week One of this class and describe how and in what ways your views have or have not changed. Analyze your Week One self-assessment using the concepts that you have included in your integrative theory and describe how your theory explains your personality. This section will be approximately one page. Provide a brief conclusion that summarizes the ideas presented in your integrative theory of personality.

This section will not feature a heading and it will be approximately two to four paragraphs. Allport, G. W. (1968). The person in psychology: Selected essays. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

The Integrative Personality Theory paper: Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length (not including the title page and references page) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper, Student’s name, Course name and number, Instructor’s name, Date submitted. Must use at least eight scholarly sources in addition to the course text. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Paper For Above instruction

Creating an integrative personality theory involves synthesizing diverse psychological models to develop a comprehensive understanding of personality development. This process requires critical analysis of existing theories, selecting key concepts, and reflecting on their applicability to personal and general human development. This paper will begin with a broad introduction to theories of personality, outlining the significance of integrating multiple perspectives to capture the complexity of personality. Subsequently, it will articulate seven core concepts derived from seven influential models, each associated with prominent theorists, to form the foundation of the proposed integrative theory.

The initial section will explore these seven concepts, such as the trait model from Gordon Allport, cognitive-affective frameworks from Walter Mischel, psychoanalytic components from Sigmund Freud, humanistic perspectives from Carl Rogers, behavioral constructs from B.F. Skinner, biological underpinnings from Hans Eysenck, and social-cognitive influences from Albert Bandura. Each subsection will detail the origin, key ideas, and relevance of these concepts, supported by scholarly references. This extensive synthesis aims to highlight strengths and potential limitations, emphasizing how these concepts collectively contribute to a robust theory of personality development.

Following this, the paper will address the concepts excluded from the model, providing a rationale for their omission. For example, phenomena such as personality-driven astrology, simplistic environmental explanations, or outdated personality typologies will be considered and justified as incompatible with the integrative framework. The rationale will involve examining these concepts against core assumptions of personality, such as the importance of empirical support, developmental consistency, and scientific rigor.

Next, there will be a comparison of healthy versus unhealthy personalities based on the integrated concepts. The discussion will include characteristics such as resilience, adaptive functioning, and authenticity versus maladaptive traits like instability, rigidity, or superficiality. The inclusion and exclusion of specific concepts will influence this characterization, providing a nuanced view of personality health.

The role of heredity, environment, and epigenetics will be analyzed to understand their influence on personality development. Heredity’s contribution to innate traits, environmental shaping, and the epigenetic mechanisms that bridge genetic predispositions and environmental inputs will be discussed, including their implications for personality disorders and interventions.

The assessment and measurement section will review how the key concepts from the integrated theory are operationalized in research and practice. Instruments such as personality inventories, behavioral assessments, neurological scans, and projective tests will be discussed regarding their applicability, reliability, and validity in measuring the constructs incorporated into the theory, supported by scholarly sources.

Finally, the self-reflection component will connect personal insights with the theoretical framework. Reflecting on initial perceptions, the paper will analyze shifts in understanding, demonstrating how the selected concepts elucidate personal traits, strengths, and areas for growth. The conclusion will synthesize the main points, emphasizing the utility and depth of the integrative theory in advancing personality psychology.

References

• Allport, G. W. (1968). The person in psychology: Selected essays. Beacon Press.
• Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Publications.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
• Carlson, N. R. (2013). Foundations of behavioral neuroscience. Pearson.
• Eysenck, H. J. (1990). The biological basis of personality. American Psychologist, 45(1), 1–10.
• Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. SE, 19, 12-66.
• Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1-22.
• Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Free Press.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.