Introduction To Business Communication Level Z Assessment

Introduction to Business Communication Level: Z Assessment Type: Individual Assignment

Scenario You have recently started work as a part-time administrative assistance at a local legal Office. The main Partners in the office wishes to scale back his work commitments and has given the responsibility of managing the day-to-day operations to his son, who has just returned from a 3 year contract in Canada. The Partner is aware of your interest in social networking technologies and has asked you to give him advice so that he can talk on the issues with his son on his return.

TASK: You are to prepare a report in house style on the following format · Executive Summary (10 Marks and 100 words) · This should give what you consider to be the main issues to be discussed · Introduction (15 marks and 150 words) · This should include a clear statement of what you intend to look at and perhaps how you will collect the data. · Literature review · Technology 1: Definition, examples and advantages and disadvantages (30 marks and 300 words) · Technology 2: Definition, examples and advantages and disadvantages (30 marks and 300 words) · Conclusion and Recommendations as to which of these you would suggest (if either). (15 marks and 150 words) References are expected and should follow the APA style

Paper For Above instruction

In an era marked by rapid technological advancement, social networking technologies have become integral to communication, especially within professional and personal contexts. This report aims to evaluate two prominent social networking technologies—Facebook and LinkedIn—that the legal office partner considers leveraging for improved communication with his son, who has recently returned from abroad. Through examining their definitions, practical examples, advantages, and disadvantages, the report seeks to inform the partner about their suitability and potential benefits or drawbacks in a professional environment. Data for this analysis will primarily be collected through literature review, including scholarly articles, industry reports, and credible online sources, to ensure a comprehensive understanding of these platforms' roles, functionalities, and relevance to business communication. Ultimately, the goal is to recommend the most appropriate technology that supports effective, ethical, and strategic communication within the legal office setting, considering factors such as privacy, ease of use, and professional networking potential.

Introduction

In today’s increasingly digital world, social networking technologies serve as vital tools for enhancing communication across various sectors, including legal practices. With the rapid growth of social media platforms, understanding their functionalities, benefits, and limitations becomes essential for effective adoption. This report investigates two widely used social networking technologies—Facebook and LinkedIn—to assess their applicability for the legal office’s needs. The primary focus is on how these platforms can facilitate transparent, professional, and efficient communication between the partner and his son. Data collection for this analysis involves a literature review of scholarly sources, industry reports, and credible online articles that provide insights into the platforms’ features and their impact on communication practices. By evaluating these technologies, the report aims to guide the partner on making an informed decision about which platform, if any, would be most beneficial for enhancing internal communication and maintaining professional relationships.

Technology 1: Facebook

Facebook, launched in 2004, is a social networking platform designed to connect individuals through profiles, messaging, and sharing features. It allows users to create personal profiles, post updates, share multimedia content, and communicate via private messages or group discussions. Facebook’s popularity stems from its wide user base, intuitive interface, and versatile functionalities that support both casual and semi-professional interactions. Its advantages include the ease of connecting with a broad network of friends, family, and colleagues, fostering informal communication, and sharing updates in real time. Additionally, Facebook offers business pages and advertising options that can aid organizations in marketing and engagement. However, disadvantages involve concerns over privacy and data security, as personal information can be accessed or misused. Its informal nature may also limit its appropriateness for strictly professional communication, and the platform can be cluttered with non-essential content, causing potential distractions. Moreover, its complex privacy settings may pose challenges in ensuring confidential communication, especially within a legal environment that demands strict confidentiality and professionalism.

Technology 2: LinkedIn

LinkedIn, founded in 2003, is a professional social networking platform focused on career development, industry networking, and professional branding. Users create detailed profiles highlighting work experience, skills, and endorsements, and connect with colleagues, industry leaders, and potential clients. LinkedIn facilitates sharing professional updates, publishing articles, and engaging in industry-specific groups, fostering networking and knowledge exchange. Its advantages include its targeted audience—professionals and organizations—making it ideal for business development, recruitment, and professional communication. LinkedIn also offers privacy controls suitable for confidential professional interactions and tools for establishing a credible online presence. However, disadvantages include the platform’s learning curve for new users, potential time investment, and its predominantly formal atmosphere, which may limit its use for casual or personal communications. Additionally, over-reliance on LinkedIn’s features can lead to superficial interactions, and the platform’s focus on professionalism might hinder spontaneous or emotional exchanges necessary for personal conversations. Despite these limitations, LinkedIn’s emphasis on professionalism makes it a suitable choice for formal communication within a legal or business context.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Based on the comparative analysis, LinkedIn emerges as the more appropriate social networking technology for the legal office’s purposes. Its focus on professionalism, privacy controls, and targeted networking aligns well with the need for discreet and effective communication between the partner and his son. While Facebook’s broad reach and informal features may facilitate casual updates, its privacy concerns and less formal environment make it less suitable for professional or sensitive exchanges typical in legal settings. Therefore, I recommend prioritizing LinkedIn as the primary platform for professional communication, complemented by the use of secure email or other confidential channels for sensitive matters. This approach ensures effective, professional interactions while safeguarding privacy and maintaining the integrity of legal communication standards.

References

  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
  • Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251.
  • Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & West, P. M. (2012). Beyond the “Like” Button: The Impact of Social Media on Business Performance. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 105-123.
  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
  • Legal Technology Insider. (2019). Social media in the legal industry: Opportunities and risks. Retrieved from https://www.legaltechnology.com
  • Smith, A. (2014). The role of social media in legal practice. Journal of Legal Technology, 28, 34-45.
  • Urbinati, R. (2015). Using social network analysis in legal research. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 23(2), 138-154.
  • LinkedIn Corporation. (2023). About LinkedIn. Retrieved from https://about.linkedin.com
  • Facebook Inc. (2023). About Facebook. Retrieved from https://about.fb.com
  • Sharma, S. (2020). Privacy concerns and professional boundaries on social media platforms. Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 133-147.