Introduction To Critical Thinking Case Study Jessica Ricard

Introduction To Critical Thinking Case Study Jessica Ricard Rasmussen College

The scenario discussed illustrates a critical issue in healthcare: medication errors stemming from miscommunication and cognitive biases, with a focus on the case of underdosing a child due to a misunderstanding of measurement units. In this case, a nurse administered a dose based on a misinterpretation of the physician’s orders, leading to a significant underdose—100 milligrams instead of the prescribed 100 grams. This discrepancy resulted from a failure to correctly interpret the medication unit, possibly influenced by the nurse’s pre-existing schemas and familiarity with certain measurement units, such as milligrams rather than grams.

Effective communication is foundational in healthcare settings, where clarity can directly impact patient safety and outcomes. The breakdown in this case underscores how cognitive factors, like schemas, influence decision-making and interpretation of critical information. When the nurse defaults to familiar information without verifying, errors occur that can have serious clinical consequences. The underdosing resulted in potential delays in treatment efficacy, risking the child's health, and exemplifies the importance of vigilance in medication administration.

In medical practice, underdosing is classified as the failure to administer an optimal medication dose tailored to the patient’s specific needs, which can lead to adverse outcomes such as treatment failure, disease progression, and increased healthcare utilization. Although not explicitly coded in current ICD-9 systems, medication underdose remains a significant patient safety concern, linked to increased emergency department visits, hospitalization, and medication-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The scenario highlights how even simple human errors can cascade into severe patient harm, emphasizing the need for systemic safeguards and critical thinking skills among healthcare professionals.

Modern healthcare has emphasized error reporting and analysis to prevent recurrence. Errors like underdosing should prompt immediate corrective actions, including stopping the medication and administering the correct dose as soon as identified. Nurses play a crucial role in this safety net; practices such as multiple patient and medication checks serve as vital safeguards against errors. The implementation of standardized procedures, such as double-verification protocols, barcode scanning, and ongoing training, can significantly reduce medication administration errors. Critical thinking is essential here, enabling nurses and healthcare providers to question assumptions, verify data, and communicate effectively.

Communication barriers often originate from pre-existing mental schemas, habitual practices, or inadequate training. To mitigate this, healthcare organizations must cultivate a culture of safety where staff feel empowered to report errors without fear of punitive consequences. Evidence suggests that punitive responses can discourage reporting, ultimately compromising safety. Instead, fostering a blame-free environment encourages transparency, learning, and continuous improvement. This approach aligns with human factors engineering principles, which aim to design systems that are resilient to human error and promote error detection and correction.

Addressing medication errors comprehensively involves adopting protocols grounded in evidence-based guidelines. These include thorough medication reconciliation, interdisciplinary communication, use of technological aids like electronic health records with integrated alerts, and ongoing education for staff. Institutional policies should support accountability while recognizing that errors are often systemic rather than solely individual failures. Providing training focused on critical thinking and decision-making enhances the ability of healthcare providers to identify potential errors proactively and manage uncertainties effectively.

In conclusion, the case underscores the importance of critical thinking in clinical practice, especially regarding medication safety. The misinterpretation of units leading to underdosing exemplifies how cognitive biases, communication failures, and system flaws interplay in healthcare errors. Cultivating a culture where safety, transparency, and continuous learning are prioritized can reduce adverse events, improve patient outcomes, and foster trust in healthcare systems. As healthcare continues to evolve with technological advancements, integrating critical thinking, effective communication, and system redesign remains vital to ensuring patient safety and quality care.

References

• Reason, J. (2000). Human error: models and management. British Medical Journal, 320(7237), 768-770.
• Petersen, L. A., et al. (2019). Advances in medication safety: system approaches to reduce errors. Journal of Patient Safety, 15(4), 315-323.
• World Health Organization. (2017). Patient safety solutions: medication errors. WHO Press.
• Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (2000). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academies Press.
• Thiselton, D. L. (2021). Critical thinking in nursing practice. Nursing Clinics of North America, 56(2), 159-171.
• Boschma, R. J., et al. (2020). The impact of communication failures on medication errors in hospital settings. Patient Safety Journal, 5(2), 45-52.
• Leape, L. L., & Berwick, D. M. (2005). Five Years After To Err Is Human: What Have We Learned? Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(19), 2384-2390.
• Carter, M. A., et al. (2018). Enhancing medication safety: a review of strategies to prevent errors. Journal of Healthcare Quality, 40(3), 122-131.
• Hutchinson, A. M., & Williams, A. (2019). Strategies to reduce medication errors in hospitals. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33(2), 171-177.
• Nurses and medication safety: Educational interventions to improve practice. (2020). Nursing Standard, 35(4), 45-52.