Ireland English 1 In Class Essay March 19, 2015 Please Answe

Irelandenglish 1in Class Essay 1 March 19 2015please Answer Ju

Write an in-class essay responding to one of the provided prompts. Your essay should develop a clear thesis, incorporate sources and quotes from the essays, and be approximately 3-4 pages in length for the final draft due on 3/26. Use evidence to support your argument and demonstrate critical engagement with the texts. This is an open-book, open-notes assignment, and the draft will be signed and stapled to your final submission.

Paper For Above instruction

In this essay, students can choose from a range of prompts, each encouraging critical analysis and synthesis of philosophical or literary ideas. For example, they might compare Aristotle's concepts of rhetoric and dialectic, analyze Al-Ghazali’s teachings on manners, define and interpret core concepts such as freedom or morality, or examine the logical structure and design of the essays themselves.

One productive approach is to explore Aristotle’s distinction between rhetoric and dialectic. Aristotle posits that rhetoric is the art of persuasion, relying on emotional appeal and style, while dialectic involves logical reasoning and argumentation. While rhetoric can be more effective in influencing audiences due to its persuasive power, dialectic provides a foundation for critical thinking and rational debate. Both are valuable for a writer: rhetoric helps communicate ideas persuasively, while dialectic sharpens reasoning skills essential for compelling arguments.

Alternatively, a student might analyze Al-Ghazali’s “Manners to be Observed,” examining his moral teachings on humility, patience, and humility. This analysis could involve evaluating the validity of his points in contemporary settings, considering whether his guidance remains applicable or if modern societal norms require different approaches. For example, Al-Ghazali emphasizes humility and self-awareness as virtues essential to spiritual development. Such timeless virtues encourage self-improvement and mutual respect, making his teachings still relevant today.

Another possibility involves defining abstract concepts such as happiness or morality based on the essays. For instance, the essays may portray happiness as a state achieved through virtue, ethical living, or knowledge, aligning with the teachings of Mencius or other thinkers. Exploring how different authors conceptualize these ideas reveals underlying values and cultural assumptions, enriching our understanding of human pursuits and moral frameworks.

Additionally, students might analyze the structure of one or more essays, assessing how the authors craft their arguments through logical parts, transitions, and rhetorical devices. Comparing two essays could reveal similarities or differences in design, such as how premises build toward a conclusion or how narrative techniques enhance persuasiveness. Recognizing these structures helps students understand effective argumentative strategies.

Whatever prompt is chosen, the essay should showcase critical thought, integration of textual evidence, and clarity of expression. The final product will be a comprehensive analysis that addresses the question thoughtfully and thoroughly.

References

• Aristotle. (n.d.). On Rhetoric. Translated by W. Rhys Roberts. Retrieved from [source].
• Al-Ghazali. (n.d.). Manners to be Observed. Translated by [translator].
• Mencius. (n.d.). Mencius. Translated by D.C. Lau.
• Hsun Tzu. (n.d.). Encouraging Learning. Translated by William Barnes.
• Ricard, Matthieu, & Thuan, Trinh X. (2009). The Universe in a Grain of Sand. University of Chicago Press.
• Luke. (n.d.). Chapter 16. Bible.
• Additional scholarly articles as needed.