Is A Person Born Gay, And Does Environment Affect It

Topic Is A Person Born Gay And If The Environment Affects Ones Sexua

Topic: Is a person born gay and if the environment affects one's sexuality? create an annotated bibliography consisting of seven sources. Each entry will consist of a reference list citation, a summary of the source’s information, and a one-sentence assessment. Each annotation should be between 150 to 200 words. If an entry is shorter than 150 words, it is likely you have not fully developed your summary, and this lack of development can severely impact your grade for this assignment.

Paper For Above instruction

Annotated Bibliography on the Origins of Sexual Orientation and the Influence of Environment

  1. Mustanski, B., Chivers-Wilson, K., & Newcomb, M. (2014). "Genetic and Environmental Influences on Same-Sex Sexual Behavior." Current Psychiatry Reports, 16(10), 469. This article examines the interplay between genetic predispositions and environmental factors in shaping sexual orientation, focusing specifically on same-sex behavior. The authors analyze twin studies, adoption data, and genetic research to determine the relative contributions of nature and nurture. The findings suggest that sexual orientation results from complex interactions between genetic factors and environmental influences such as family dynamics, peer relationships, and societal norms. The study underscores that while biological factors do have a significant influence, environmental elements can modulate or reinforce innate tendencies, emphasizing a multifaceted origin of sexual orientation. The authors recommend further longitudinal and interdisciplinary research to deepen understanding of these influences. Overall, the article provides substantial evidence supporting the biological basis of sexual orientation but acknowledges the importance of environmental context. Assessment: The article offers a comprehensive, scientifically rigorous analysis of genetic and environmental influences, making it highly valuable for understanding the complex origins of sexual orientation.

  2. Bailey, J. M., & Zucker, K. J. (1995). "A Critical Review of the Literature on the Development of Sexual Orientation." Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 229-249. This review critically evaluates empirical research concerning the development of sexual orientation, focusing on whether it is primarily innate or shaped by environmental factors. Bailey and Zucker analyze twin studies, familial patterns, and psychosocial influences, highlighting that most evidence aligns with a biological predisposition for homosexuality. They also discuss environmental influences such as childhood experiences, parenting styles, and cultural context, noting their potential to influence sexual identity expression rather than orientation itself. The review emphasizes the need for methodological rigor and longitudinal designs to disentangle causation from correlation. The authors conclude that although environmental factors can influence how sexual orientation is expressed or experienced, the core orientation appears largely rooted in biological processes. This review remains influential in debates about nature versus nurture in sexual orientation. Assessment: The review provides a balanced and thorough synthesis of existing research, emphasizing the primary biological factors while acknowledging environmental impacts on expression.

  3. Hamer, D. H., Hu, S., Magnuson, V. L., Hu, N., & Pattatucci, A. M. (1993). "A Linkage Between DNA Markers on the X Chromosome and Homosexuality." Science, 261(5119), 321-327. This pioneering study investigates the genetic basis of homosexuality by analyzing DNA markers and family histories. The researchers identified a potential genetic link on the X chromosome, suggesting a heritable component to sexual orientation. The study used linkage analysis in multiple families and found evidence that certain genetic markers were more common among gay men than heterosexual controls. Despite its groundbreaking nature, the authors acknowledge that the findings do not determine sexuality definitively but support the hypothesis that genetics play a role. They also discuss non-genetic factors, such as hormonal influences in utero, which could contribute to sexual orientation development. The study stimulated ongoing research into genetic influences but also highlighted that environmental influences, particularly prenatal conditions, are likely involved. Assessment: This influential research provides strong evidence for genetic contributions to sexual orientation while recognizing the significance of prenatal and environmental factors.

  4. IGLYO. (2018). "Environmental and Social Influences on Sexual Identity." In this report, IGLYO explores how social and environmental factors, including family, peer groups, media, and societal attitudes, impact the development and expression of sexual identity globally. The report emphasizes that while biological factors are foundational, external influences can shape how individuals understand and express their sexuality, especially in contexts where societal acceptance varies. It discusses the role of cultural norms, religious beliefs, and societal stigma in suppressing or facilitating sexual minority identities. The report underscores that environment plays a crucial role in the visibility, acceptance, and mental health outcomes of LGBTQ+ individuals. It advocates for inclusive policies and social support systems that respect diverse sexualities, highlighting that environmental context is dynamic and significantly influences personal development. Overall, it reinforces the view that environmental factors are integral in shaping the lived experiences of sexual minorities. Assessment: The report provides a comprehensive analysis of social and cultural influences on sexuality, emphasizing the importance of environment alongside biological factors.

  5. Mustanski, B., & Fisher, C. B. (2016). "Future Directions in Sexual Minority Research." Journal of Sex Research, 53(4-5), 400-410. This article discusses emerging trends and future research priorities in understanding sexual orientation development, emphasizing the interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors. The authors argue for more interdisciplinary studies integrating genetics, neuroscience, sociology, and psychology to understand how environment and biology together shape sexuality. They stress the importance of longitudinal research in diverse populations to clarify causal pathways and developmental processes. The article also highlights ethical considerations in studying sexual orientation, especially regarding privacy, consent, and potential stigmatization. It advocates for societal change that reduces stigma and fosters supportive environments, which are critical for positive mental health outcomes among sexual minorities. The authors conclude that future research should continue to explore both biological and environmental influences synergistically. Assessment: The article provides a forward-looking perspective on research, emphasizing the need for integrated approaches to understanding sexuality development.

  6. Bailey, J. M., & Martin, N. G. (2001). "Genetic and Environmental Influences on Sexual Orientation." Behavior Genetics, 31(2), 149-159. This study synthesizes twin and adoption studies to quantify the relative influence of genetic and environmental factors on sexual orientation. The authors report that approximately 35-45% of the variation in sexual orientation can be attributed to genetic factors, with the remainder explained by environmental influences, including prenatal conditions and social experiences. They discuss how genetic predispositions may interact with environmental context to produce diverse sexual orientations. The paper also notes cultural and familial influences that can shape how individuals perceive and express their innate orientations. The findings underscore that biological and environmental factors are interconnected, and neither alone fully explains sexual orientation. The authors call for further research using advanced genomic techniques and more nuanced assessments of environmental factors. Overall, their evidence supports a partially heritable model with significant environmental modulation. Assessment: The study offers a nuanced, data-driven perspective on the genetically and environmentally complex origins of sexual orientation.

  7. Diamond, L. M. (2003). "If There, Then What? The Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth." Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(4), 313-319. This qualitative research explores how environmental factors and social contexts influence sexual identity development among LGBTQ+ youth. Diamond emphasizes that experiences of acceptance, rejection, cultural background, and peer support significantly impact how sexual orientations are understood, navigated, and expressed. The study highlights the role of family dynamics, school environment, and media representation in shaping self-perception and mental health. She argues that while biological predispositions may exist, the environment critically influences the process of identity realization and social integration. The research suggests that supportive environments facilitate healthier development, whereas rejection and stigma can lead to adverse mental health outcomes. The findings advocate for inclusive education, family support, and policy reforms to foster positive developmental contexts for sexual minority youth. Overall, the study underscores the powerful role of environment in the lived experience of sexual orientation. Assessment: The qualitative insights underscore the essential role of social and familial environments in shaping sexual identity and well-being.

References

  • Mustanski, B., Chivers-Wilson, K., & Newcomb, M. (2014).. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16(10), 469.
  • Bailey, J. M., & Zucker, K. J. (1995). Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 229-249.
  • Hamer, D. H., Hu, S., Magnuson, V. L., Hu, N., & Pattatucci, A. M. (1993). Science, 261(5119), 321-327.
  • IGLYO. (2018). "Environmental and Social Influences on Sexual Identity."
  • Mustanski, B., & Fisher, C. B. (2016). Journal of Sex Research, 53(4-5), 400-410.
  • Bailey, J. M., & Martin, N. G. (2001). Behavior Genetics, 31(2), 149-159.
  • Diamond, L. M. (2003). Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(4), 313-319.

Related Assignments