Is The Final Exam Essay For This Class All That You

Essay 3 Is The Final Exam Essay For This Class All That You Have

Essay 3 is the Final Exam Essay for this class. All that you have learned this past semester about writing documented academic essays should be reflected in this final essay. This essay is worth 200 points. The essay must be at least six full pages in length, with a Works Cited page included (not part of the page count). You are required to incorporate material from at least four library sources—books or articles from the library databases—including two sources that are new and different from those used in your previous essay. The total number of sources, including primary sources, should be seven or more entries in your Works Cited. The purpose of the essay is to argue to mediate, which involves understanding opposing positions, identifying common ground, and proposing a course of action that reduces conflict or misunderstanding. To succeed, you must thoroughly understand the opposing sides, carefully analyze all primary sources to identify theses, reasons, and evidence, and consider underlying assumptions, principles, values, or emotional factors influencing each side. The essay should follow three organizational sections: an overview of the conflict, an explanation of the differences underlying the conflict, and a proposed solution. Supporting evidence such as facts, testimony, and statistics should be well-explained and relevant. You must comply with specific formatting guidelines: 1-inch margins, Times New Roman 12 pt font, double-spaced text, and proper MLA citations and formatting for in-text citations and the Works Cited page. Use the sample MLA research paper from the textbook as a model for formatting your essay. Furthermore, you need to carefully interpret data and sources to reveal underlying beliefs and emotions that influence each side’s position, which is crucial for effective mediation.

Paper For Above instruction

The final exam essay for this class is designed to demonstrate your comprehensive understanding of academic writing, source integration, and critical analysis, all within the framework of a mediation argument based on Chapter 11 of your textbook. The core goal is to craft a nuanced, balanced mediation essay that respectfully engages with opposing viewpoints and seeks common ground. This type of essay goes beyond mere advocacy or inquiry; it emphasizes reducing conflict through careful investigation, empathetic understanding, and constructive proposals.

The foundation of this assignment rests on the concept that most conflicts stem more from differences in interpretation, values, or emotional commitments than from factual discrepancies alone. Successful mediations, therefore, require thorough analysis—not only of the explicit reasons and evidence but also of underlying assumptions, principles, and emotional drivers that shape each side's stance. This process involves a detailed reading and rereading of primary sources associated with the contentious issue, aiming to identify what each side believes and why they hold these beliefs (Citations: Fisher & Ury, 1981; Shell, 2006).

A crucial aspect of this project is to explore questions such as whether the core disagreement arises from differences in principles, values, or priorities; whether the conflict involves interpretations, assumptions, or emotional needs. Literary and empirical analysis should guide the uncovering of implicit motives and views that influence each position, as understanding these nuances is essential to identify a mutually acceptable middle ground.

The essay's structure begins with an overview of the conflict, providing context and clarity about the issues at stake. This section should succinctly present the positions of each side, highlighting their primary concerns and motivations without bias or bias. The second section delves into the underlying differences that cause the conflict, drawing on primary sources and analyzing why each side believes what they do, informed by evidence and contextual understanding. This analysis should consider whether disagreements are rooted in factual disputes, moral principles, cultural values, or emotional needs, supported by specific examples from the sources.

The final section proposes a realistic, fair solution that acknowledges and respects the valid points raised by each side. This mediation proposal should aim to create a compromise or a shared understanding that reduces tension and conflict. It should be specific, practical, and supported by data, testimony, or scholarly insight, illustrating its feasibility and mutual benefit.

Throughout your essay, substantiate every claim with evidence and explanation, integrating quotes, statistics, or testimony seamlessly with proper MLA citations. The essay should follow the strict formatting standards: double-spaced, Times New Roman 12-point font, with nil margins, and a correctly formatted Works Cited page reflecting all sources used. Support your analysis with credible library sources, ensuring at least four are new and distinct from previous work, to demonstrate your ability to conduct scholarly research and synthesize diverse perspectives in pursuit of a balanced resolution.

In sum, this final mediation essay demands critical thinking, empathetic understanding, and balanced argumentation. It challenges you to go beyond advocacy, to interpret sources deeply, and to craft a proposal that genuinely bridges differences, fostering understanding and cooperation rather than division. Successfully completing this task will showcase your mastery of academic writing, source integration, and conflict resolution strategies learned throughout the semester.

References

• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.
• Shell, G. R. (2006). Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People. Penguin.
• Johnson, R., & Johnson, D. (2000). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills. Pearson.
• Thompson, L. (2015). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Pearson.
• Kaye, B. (2010). Conflict Resolution Skills. SAGE Publications.
• Rahim, M. A. (2002). Toward a Theory of Managing Organizational Conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 220-234.
• Deutsch, M. (2011). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. Yale University Press.
• Putnam, L. L., & Poole, M. S. (2016). Conflict and Negotiation. SAGE Publications.
• Salacuse, J. W. (2007). Negotiating Life: Secrets for Everyday Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. K. (2017). Working Through Conflict: Strategies for Relationships, Groups, and Organizations. Routledge.