Jenny Cochran, A Graduate Of The University Of Tennessee Wit ✓ Solved

Jenny Cochran, a graduate of The University of Tennessee with

Jenny Cochran, a graduate of The University of Tennessee with 4 years of experience as an equities analyst, was recently brought in as assistant to the chairman of the board of Computron Industries, a manufacturer of computer components. During the previous year, Computron had doubled its plant capacity, opened new sales offices outside its home territory, and launched an expensive advertising campaign. Cochran was assigned to evaluate the impact of the changes. She began by gathering financial statements and other data. What effect did the expansion have on sales and net income? What effect did the expansion have on the asset side of the balance sheet? What do you conclude from the statement of cash flows? What is Computron’s net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)? What are operating current assets? What are operating current liabilities? How much net operating working capital and total net operating capital does Computron have? What is Computron’s free cash flow (FCF)? What are Computron’s 'net uses' of its FCF? Calculate Computron’s return on invested capital (ROIC). Computron has a 10% cost of capital (WACC). What caused the decline in the ROIC? Was it due to operating profitability or capital utilization? Do you think Computron’s growth added value? What is Computron's EVA? The cost of capital was 10% in both years. Assume that a corporation has $200,000 of taxable income from operations. What is the company's federal tax liability? Assume that you are in the 25% marginal tax bracket and that you have $50,000 to invest. You have narrowed your investment choices down to municipal bonds yielding 7% or equally risky corporate bonds with a yield of 10%. Which one should you choose and why? At what marginal tax rate would you be indifferent?

James Madison was brought in as assistant to Computron’s chairman, who had the task of getting the company back into a sound financial position. Madison must prepare an analysis of where the company is now, what it must do to regain its financial health, and what actions to take. Your assignment is to help her answer the following questions, using the recent and projected financial information shown next. Provide clear explanations, not yes or no answers. Why are ratios useful? What three groups use ratio analysis and for what reasons? Calculate the profit margin, operating profit margin, basic earning power (BEP), return on assets (ROA), and return on equity (ROE). What can you say about these ratios? Calculate the inventory turnover, days sales outstanding (DSO), fixed assets turnover, operating capital requirement, and total assets turnover. How does Computron's utilization of assets stack up against other firms in its industry? Calculate the current and quick ratios based on the projected balance sheet and income statement data. What can you say about the company’s liquidity position and its trend? Calculate the debt ratio, liabilities-to-assets ratio, times-interest-earned, and EBITDA coverage ratios. How does Computron compare with the industry with respect to financial leverage? What can you conclude from these ratios? Calculate the price/earnings ratio and market/book ratio. Do these ratios indicate that investors are expected to have a high or low opinion of the company? Use the extended DuPont equation to provide a summary and overview of Computron's projected financial condition. What are the firm's major strengths and weaknesses? What are some potential problems and limitations of financial ratio analysis? What are some qualitative factors analysts should consider when evaluating a company’s likely future financial performance?

Paper For Above Instructions

The performance of Computron Industries, as analyzed through various financial metrics, provides essential insights into the implications of its expansion strategies. The expansion, characterized by increased plant capacity and a broader market presence, has significantly affected the company's sales and net income metrics.

To fully understand the impact of the recent expansions, we will examine sales growth and net income fluctuations. Sales revenue is expected to have surged due to increased production capabilities and a larger consumer base from the new sales offices. This expected rise in demand likely enhanced net income positively unless offset by higher operational costs associated with the expansion.

The asset side of the balance sheet experienced changes, predominantly by increasing current and fixed assets, which includes inventory and plant equipment. With Computron doubling its capacity, a notable capital infusion into fixed assets explains the anticipated rise in total assets, as corroborated by the asset growth rate.

The statement of cash flows offers crucial insights, particularly regarding operational cash generation and capital expenditures. An increase in cash flow from operating activities demonstrates improved profitability, while capital expenditures reflect investments fueling future growth opportunities.

Computron’s net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) can be calculated by applying the formula: NOPAT = Operating Income × (1 - Tax Rate). If the operating income is reported as $300,000 with a tax rate of 30%, NOPAT amounts to $210,000. This figure reveals the profitability available to shareholders after operational costs, presenting a crucial component in value-creation analyses.

To further evaluate Computron's liquidity and operational efficiency, we must determine the operating current assets and liabilities. Operating current assets typically consist of accounts receivable, inventory, and cash equivalents, while current liabilities comprise accounts payable and short-term debts. These metrics allow us to assess the net operating working capital (NOWC), calculated as Operating Current Assets - Operating Current Liabilities. Total net operating capital includes both NOWC and fixed assets, driving the assessment of Computron’s operational capacity.

Free cash flow (FCF), a measure of operational profitability available after capital expenditures, is calculated using: FCF = NOPAT - Capital Expenditures. Utilized effectively, FCF can support strategic initiatives, shareholder returns, and investments while retaining cash for operational fluidity.

The net uses of Computron's FCF fundamentally comprise debt repayment, reinvestment, and dividends. It is important for the management team to prioritize these allocations based on strategic objectives and market conditions. The calculation of return on invested capital (ROIC) indicates the efficiency at which capital is utilized in generating profits; ROIC is computed as NOPAT / Invested Capital, with Computron’s invested capital drawing insights from total debt and equity.

Determining this return relative to the cost of capital, set at 10%, reveals the implications of strategic decisions made regarding growth. A decline in ROIC may predominantly stem from increased capital invested for minimal operating profit growth, suggesting inefficiencies in capital utilization rather than profitability degradation.

Quantifying economic value added (EVA), a measure merging profit and cost of capital impacts: EVA = NOPAT - (Invested Capital × Cost of Capital), provides insights into whether Computron's growth added value. A positive EVA indicates successful capital investments resulted in greater profitability than associated capital costs.

Tax implications are significant to consider. Given a taxable income of $200,000, we calculate the federal tax liability as: Tax Liability = Tax Rate × Taxable Income. A 10% tax indicates $20,000 owed, illustrating the financial burdens tied to income levels.

Investment considerations between municipal bonds with a yield of 7% and corporate bonds yielding 10% require an examination of after-tax returns. An investor in the 25% tax bracket would receive an effective yield of 7.5% on corporate bonds, rendering them more attractive than municipal options unless the tax rate reaches 30%. Conversely, for an investor indifferent to both, a 30% marginal tax rate would yield equal effective yields of both investment options, thus facilitating the investor's decision-making.

Addressing the second question, the utility of financial ratios lies in their comparative assessments—allowing stakeholders, including managers, investors, and creditors, to derive meaningful insights into operational performance. Investors prioritize profitability ratios, while lenders focus on liquidity and solvency ratios to assess risk.

Ratios such as profit margin, operating profit margin, ROA, and ROE form the foundation of profitability assessment, while liquidity ratios like current and quick ratios provide context regarding immediate cash availability. A strong profit margin signifies efficiency in revenue conversion to profit, while operating profit margins normalize earnings by considering operational costs.

Comparative analysis extends to asset utilization metrics such as inventory turnover and total assets turnover; these metrics gauge operational efficiency against industry standards. A lower DSO suggests efficiency in cash collections, while high turnover ratios signal effective inventory management. Conversely, increased capital requirements may indicate operational strains or inefficiencies.

Computron's financial leverage ratios help depict its risk structure. The debt ratio and liabilities-to-assets ratio yield insights into capital structure, critical for investors assessing risks. High ratios indicate heavy reliance on external financing, while lower metrics might attract risk-averse stakeholders.

The price/earnings and market/book ratios encapsulate market perception, reflecting investors' expectations of the company's future performance. An investor's solid opinion of Computron can signal growth potential, seemingly reinforced by the extended DuPont analysis, which delineates profitability, asset efficiency, and leverage as fundamental indicators of performance.

Nevertheless, analysts must remain cognizant of potential problems associated with financial ratio analysis, including contextual discrepancies and qualitative factors missing from quantitative data. Aspects like management quality, industry positioning, and macroeconomic factors emerge as pivotal in tailoring comprehensive evaluations of future financial performance.

References

• Gitman, L. J., & Zutter, C. J. (2018). Principles of Managerial Finance. Pearson.
• Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory & Practice. Cengage Learning.
• Damodaran, A. (2015). Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice. Wiley.
• Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2020). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. Wiley.
• Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management. McGraw-Hill.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. A. (2016). Essentials of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill.
• Penman, S. H. (2016). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation. McGraw-Hill.
• White, G. I., Sondhi, A. J., & Fried, D. (2003). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. Wiley.
• Brigham, E. F. (2014). Financial Management. Cengage Learning.
• Fridson, M. S., & Alvarez, F. (2011). Financial Statement Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide. Wiley.