Johnson C. Smith University Department Of Business Administr

Johnson C Smith University Department Of Business Administration And

Johnson C Smith University Department Of Business Administration And Johnson C Smith University Department Of Business Administration and Economics Total Quality Management – MGT 440 Spring Semester 2020 SIX SIGMA PAPER AND PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS The Six Sigma paper and presentation should will be on an assigned company and how the company uses this methodology with one of its’ particular products. Format and specifics are listed below. You can find information about Six Sigma at: & There is an automatic 30% deduction for the paper and presentation if these structural requirements and minimum paper length are not met. You will receive a failing grade for the paper and presentation if you submit a company not assigned to you by the instructor. If your paper and presentation is found to have been used previously or used from a previous course, your course paper will not be accepted and you will receive a failing grade for the course. No late papers will be accepted for any reason, but all papers and assignments can be submitted in advance. Paper and Presentation Deliverables: Final version of the paper and presentation must be submitted through the Canvas Links under Week 15 before Friday, May 1, 2020 by 5:00 PM. You are welcome to submit the paper via email ( [email protected] ) for critique before the final paper is submitted until April 24th. Six Sigma Paper Guidelines That You MUST Comply With The Six Sigma paper should be at least 8-complete-pages on an assigned company and how the company uses this methodology with one of its’ particular products. Format and specifics are listed below: Purpose: • To read and understand a specific TQM theory or practice (Six Sigma). • To apply marketing theory to a specific business or real world problem or company. • To demonstrate the ability to do business research. • To show written competency in business writing. Research Paper Structural Requirements: • Length: at least 8 complete pages of written content (not including Title Page, Reference Page, Graphics, Images, Charts, etc.) (Make it 10 pages just to be sure) • Double-spaced, but not extra double-spaces between paragraphs. • 12 point, Times New Roman font only with 1-inch margins all around (top, bottom, left, right). • Remember that your paper must follow APA Style standards. For detailed information about APA Style visit, • For your paper references, you can use academic journals, magazines, books, and Internet sources. You need at least 6 references. • Submit your paper and presentation by submitting it through the Canvas links under Week 15 before 5PM on Friday, May 1, 2020. Paper format (Total 135 points): • TITLE PAGE: 1. Full title 2. Writer’s name 3. Instructor’s name 4. Course and Due Date • INTRODUCTION (10 points): an introduction that tells the reader the theory you will discuss and how you applied this theory to a business or product/service. (1 • COMPANY BACKGROUND (10 points): Give a background of the company and its product and/or services. (1 page maximum) • SIX SIGMA BACKGROUND (15 points): Give a background of the Six Sigma theory. (1.5-3 pages maximum) 1. What Six Sigma is and how it’s measured 2. D-M-A-I-C methodology 3. Explain 3 Belts Levels (Master, Black, and Green) • INTEGRATION (50 points): Discuss how the Six Sigma theory is integrated into the company or product/service. Present the pluses and minuses of the integration and how effective the integration is. (2-3 pages minimum) • CONCLUSIONS (35 points): Discuss the long-term results of the integration and your personal opinion if the Six Sigma theory is properly applied. In addition, whether you believe the integration is and/or will continue to be successful in the future. (1-2 pages minimum) • RESEARCH REQUIREMENT(REFERENCE PAGE) (15 points): 6 sources, which shall include a minimum of: 1. 1 book (textbook) 2. 3 periodical article (magazine or scholarly journal) 3. 1 Internet article Six Sigma Presentation (135 points) Guidelines That You MUST Comply With The Six Sigma Presentation should be a summary of your Six Sigma Paper. You should cover the following topics in your power point presentation: • TITLE SLIDE: 1. Full title 2. Writer’s name 3. Instructor’s name 4. Course and Due Date • INTRODUCTION (5 points): an introduction that tells the reader the theory you will discuss and how you applied this theory to a business or product/service. • COMPANY BACKGROUND (15 points): Give a background of the company and its product and/or services. • SIX SIGMA BACKGROUND (15 points): Give a background of the Six Sigma theory. 1. What Six Sigma is and how it’s measured 2. D-M-A-I-C methodology 3. Explain 3 Belts Levels (Master, Black, and Green) • INTEGRATION (25 points): Discuss how the Six Sigma theory is integrated into the company or product/service. Present the pluses and minuses of the integration and how effective the integration is. • CONCLUSIONS (25 points): Discuss the long-term results of the integration and your personal opinion if the Six Sigma theory is properly applied. In addition, whether you believe the integration is and/or will continue to be successful in the future. *IMPORTANT NOTE: In the notes section at the bottom of EACH slide you should have talking points, as if you were actually presenting it to the class. The talking points section should be at least words (50 points). Student Six Sigma Assignments Six Sigma Companies Assigned Student 1 Dell Computers Aaron Adair 2 Boeing Alvin Brown 3 Toshiba Auston Bruton 4 Lockheed Martin Destiny Coppage 5 John Deere Dominic Davidson 6 DuPont David Francis 7 3M Martina Grady 8 Ford Motor Company Imoni Hines-Faison 9 Ford Motor Company Justice Jackson 10 Caterpillar Abdullah Jalloh 11 General Electric Mykaela Johnson 12 General Electric Larry Jones 13 Starwood Hotels & Resorts Xavier Jones 14 Motorola Essence Lewis 15 Samsung Group Mustafia Love 16 Honeywell J’Ona McKoy 17 PepsiCo Taequan Owens 18 Dell Computers Tomani Richardson 19 Boeing Tyler Robinson 20 Toshiba Dwayne Taylor 21 Lockheed Martin Alexis Tooks 22 John Deere J Kevin Vazquez 23 DuPont Ambre’Nasia Williams 24 3M Imari Williams

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Total Quality Management (TQM) emphasizes continuous improvement and customer satisfaction through systematic processes. Among TQM methodologies, Six Sigma stands out as a powerful tool for reducing defects and improving quality. This paper explores how Boeing, a leading aerospace manufacturer, implements Six Sigma with its commercial airplane division, focusing on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. By analyzing Boeing’s integration of Six Sigma, the potential benefits, challenges, and long-term implications will be discussed.

Company Background

Boeing, founded in 1916, is one of the world’s largest aerospace companies, specializing in the design and manufacturing of commercial and military aircraft, satellites, and defense systems. Its commercial airplane division is renowned for innovative aircraft models, notably the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, introduced to enhance fuel efficiency and passenger comfort. Boeing’s global operations and complex manufacturing processes necessitate rigorous quality control measures to compete effectively and ensure safety standards.

Six Sigma Background

Six Sigma, developed by Motorola in the 1980s, is a data-driven approach aimed at reducing defects and variability in processes, striving for near perfection (3.4 defects per million opportunities). It employs the DMAIC framework—Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control—to systematically improve processes (Harry & Schroeder, 2000). The methodology emphasizes statistical tools and teamwork to identify root causes of defects and implement sustainable solutions.

The hierarchy of Six Sigma belts—Yellow, Green, Black, and Master Black—reflects levels of expertise and leadership in Six Sigma initiatives. The Green Belt typically leads projects within their departments, Black Belts manage complex projects, and Master Black Belts serve as high-level trainers and strategists (Pande, Neuman, & Cavanagh, 2000).

Integration of Six Sigma at Boeing

Boeing’s adoption of Six Sigma aimed to streamline its manufacturing processes, reduce defect rates, and improve delivery timelines. The company integrated Six Sigma primarily into the manufacturing and assembly lines of the 787 Dreamliner, utilizing trained Green and Black Belts to oversee process improvements. One notable application was in the composite material manufacturing, where Six Sigma tools identified key sources of variability and defects.

The benefits of this integration included significant reduction in component rework, enhanced process control, and increased customer satisfaction due to improved product quality. For example, Boeing reported a dramatic decrease in manufacturing defects related to the fuselage assembly after implementing Six Sigma solutions (Boeing Annual Report, 2019).

However, challenges also emerged. The complexity of aerospace manufacturing required extensive training, cross-departmental coordination, and cultural shifts within the organization. Some projects faced resistance from employees skeptical of change or unfamiliar with statistical tools. Additionally, the high costs of training and implementation necessitated careful project selection to ensure ROI.

Effectiveness and Long-term Impact

Boeing’s strategic use of Six Sigma contributed to measurable quality improvements and cost savings, reinforcing its competitive advantage. The methodology facilitated systematic problem-solving and fostered a culture of continuous improvement. Long-term, Boeing continues to refine its Six Sigma initiatives, integrating Lean principles and digital technologies to sustain gains and adapt to evolving market demands.

Concluding thoughts suggest that Boeing’s application of Six Sigma has been largely successful, with notable reductions in defects and improved efficiency. Continued commitment and integration of advanced analytics are crucial for maintaining success in future projects.

References

  • Boeing. (2019). Annual Report. Boeing Corporation.
  • Harry, M., & Schroeder, R. (2000). Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World's Top Corporations. Currency.
  • George, M. L. (2002). Lean Six Sigma: Combining Six Sigma Quality with Lean Production Speed. McGraw-Hill.
  • Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., & Cavanagh, R. R. (2000). The Six Sigma Way: How Companies Greater Than 20,000 Employees (and Less) Are Using Graphics, Data, and Robust Methods to Improve Quality. McGraw-Hill.
  • Antony, J. (2006). Six Sigma for Service Processes. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17(1), 37-41.
  • Snee, R. D. (2004). Six Sigma: The Evolution of a Quality Improvement Paradigm. Quality Progress, 37(4), 48-54.
  • Harry, M., & Schroeder, R. (2000). Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy. McGraw-Hill.
  • George, M. L. (2002). Lean Six Sigma: Combining Six Sigma Quality with Lean Production Speed. McGraw-Hill.
  • Parast, M. M., & Adams, S. G. (2012). Applying Lean Six Sigma in the Aerospace Industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50(4), 1162-1178.
  • Hahn, G. J., & Hoerl, R. W. (2002). The Black Belt Program: Transforming a Manufacturing Company Using Six Sigma. Quality Progress, 35(2), 23-29.

Related Assignments