Laureate Education Inc Nursing 6441 Work Breakdown Structure

2013 Laureate Education Inc 1nurs 6441work Breakdown Structure

Imagine that you are a project manager tasked with the implementation of a hospital’s new electronic health record (EHR) system. The system components are broken down into four major deliverables and a series of granular deliverables that correspond to each major one. The assignment involves exploring the three work breakdown structure formats below to see how the EHR implementation can be represented through a WBS.

The three WBS formats include:

1. Tabular WBS: A hierarchical table listing levels of the project with start and end dates, owners, and task details.
2. Hierarchical WBS: A tree structure representing the levels and elements with corresponding codes, names, and relationships.
3. Tree Structure WBS: A visual hierarchy breaking down the project deliverables into granular components.

Utilize the provided examples to understand how each format captures the scope, timing, and responsibilities within the EHR project. The goal is to demonstrate comprehensive understanding by explaining the utility of each format and how they facilitate project planning, scheduling, and communication among stakeholders.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The implementation of a hospital's electronic health record (EHR) system is a complex project that benefits significantly from various work breakdown structure (WBS) formats. Each format—tabular, hierarchical, and tree structure—offers unique advantages that help project managers organize tasks, assign responsibilities, and monitor progress effectively.

Firstly, the tabular WBS provides a detailed and easily interpretable format, arranging project activities in a table that encapsulates levels of work along with start and end dates, and owners responsible for each task. This format facilitates quick access to critical information, aids in time management, and is invaluable for scheduling and resource allocation. For example, in the hospital EHR project, the tabular WBS breaks down the major deliverable into components like Patient Information Management (PIM), Clinical Information System (CIS), Laboratory Module, and Pharmacy Module, each with detailed sub-tasks such as registration, order management, and laboratory reporting. This structure supports project managers in tracking deadlines and responsibilities efficiently.

Secondly, the hierarchical WBS employs a numbering system and indentation to show the relationship between parent and child components, emphasizing the hierarchy of tasks. It visually depicts how broad deliverables subdivide into more specific activities—for example, the 'Electronic Health Record' main node branches into modules like PIM, CIS, Laboratory, and Pharmacy, each further subdivided into detailed tasks. This format is particularly useful during planning and scope definition because it clarifies the scope and dependencies. It ensures that all necessary components are included and helps communicate the structure to stakeholders clearly.

Thirdly, the tree structure WBS provides a visual representation of the project’s scope, often using diagrams or flowcharts. This format helps stakeholders grasp the overall structure quickly and notice relationships or overlaps between tasks visually. In the context of the EHR implementation, the tree structure allows project teams to see how different modules integrate, identify potential bottlenecks, and ensure a logical progression of activities. It enhances stakeholder engagement and supports collaborative planning efforts.

In synthesis, each WBS format—the tabular, hierarchical, and tree structure—is instrumental for different aspects of project management. The tabular WBS excels in scheduling and resource management; the hierarchical WBS aids in scope definition and clarity; and the tree structure enhances visual understanding and stakeholder communication. Integrating all three views ensures comprehensive project planning, effective communication, and successful implementation of the EHR system.

Conclusively, applying these varied formats allows project managers to approach complex healthcare IT projects like EHR implementation more systematically, reducing risks, improving coordination, and enhancing overall project success.

References

• Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). 6th Edition. Project Management Institute.
• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
• Larson, E., & Gray, C. (2017). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Heldman, K. (2018). PMP: Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide. Sybex.
• PMI. (2021). The Standard for Work Breakdown Structures. Project Management Institute.
• Heldman, K., & Amundsen, M. (2019). PMP Project Management Professional Exam Practice Test and Study Guide. Wiley.
• Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme. Wiley.
• Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2020). The Scrum Guide. Scrum.org.
• ISO 21500:2012. Guidance on project management. International Organization for Standardization.