Lauren's Introduction Before This Discussion Assignment

Laurenintroductionbefore This Discussion Assignment I Had Never Seen T

Lauren Introduction Before this discussion assignment I had never seen the 7-S model. Peters (2011) defines the 7-S as a strategic implementation that positions businesses to achieve organizational goals and objectives. This may sound very simple, but in most cases, it is not. This discussion has helped enlighten me on the 7-S model and how it helps different organization. The 7 -S Model The 7-S model consist of 7 different components.

These components are strategy, systems, skills, style, staffing, sharing values, and structure. A strategy is a series of actions and unique characteristics of the firm that support sustainable competitive advantages. Structure deals on how work is divided a and how authority is shared across the organization. Systems are the processes, policies and other mechanisms used to measure and support the strategy. Staffing and skills support the implementation of the strategy by deploying, training and even recruiting people with the necessary skills to execute each task.

Style is a construct that captures how interactions and relationships affect the strategy. Shared values or superordinate goals encompass the guiding principles and operational priorities of the organization in a way that supports the strategy (Dyer et al., 2016). Dual Component Analysis All seven components of the 7-S model are equally important in any organization. But, there are two components that work very well together. These components are strategy and structure.

These two components are the foundation of any organization. When an organization has a well put together strategy and structure this will allow the leaders of an organization to measure success and evaluate what is not going correctly. When done correctly this will be beneficial to any organization. Most Challenging Components of Implementation Although all seven parts of the 7-S model aren’t easy to implement I believe staffing is the most challenging. There are so many different factors that may arise with staffing.

One big factor is the turnover rate in an organization. If an organization has a high turnover rate and the organization pays for training for new employees. This can cost a lot of money if employees keep quitting. References Dyer, J. H., Godfrey, P., Jensen, R., & Bryce, D. (2016). Strategic management: Peters, T. (2011). McKinsey 7-S model. Leadership Excellence Essentials, 28(10), 7. Justin A description of the value of each step within the 7 S model to implementing change with the organization, including at least one supportive example The 7-S Model was created by McKinsey and Company in the 1980's, providing leaders with a way to identify the elements of their organization that must be in alignment if they want to effectively implement their strategy for creating and sustaining competitive advantage (Dyer, Godfrey, Jensen, & Bryce, 2016). The 7 elements include: (a) strategy, (b) structure, (c) systems, (d) staffing, (e) skills, (f) style, and (g) shared values (Dyer et al., 2016).

The strategy is an organization's plan to create and sustain their competitive advantage (Dyer et al., 2016). The structure of an organization divides the tasks and labor throughout the organization's members (Dyer et al., 2016). Furthermore, structure identifies the authority structure, creates accountability, and provides an opportunity for performance measurement of a single organizational unit (Dyer et al., 2016). Two examples of organizational structure are the matrix structure and the M-form corporation (Dyer et al., 2016). The systems element identifies the organizational processes that coordinate and control the work performed throughout the firm (Dyer et al., 2016).

This could include the information system and how it affects different parts of the organization. The staffing element of the 7-S Model includes the human resource management of the organization, to include recruiting, hiring, training, firing, etc. (Dyer et al., 2016). Leaders must identify their recruiting strategy, their training strategy, and if they want to promote from within the company or not. The skills element not only refers to the abilities of the organization's members, but also how well the leaders are able to combine the talent of their employees to create competitive advantage (Dyer et al., 2016). The skills element is closely related to the staffing element, as it will help determine who a firm must hire and/or train.

The style element describes the interpersonal relationships within an organization (Dyer et al., 2016). Style can usually be described as formal or informal, and heavily affects the culture of the organization (Dyer et al., 2016). Lastly, the shared values element describes the values and priorities of the organization (Dyer et al., 2016). What the organization's members deem important can be referred to as superordinate goals, and help create shared values and the culture of the organization (Dyer et al., 2016). An analysis of which one or two specific component(s) of the 7 S Model could be most helpful from a change management perspective, including at least one supportive example I believe the shared values element of the 7-S model could be the most helpful from a change management perspective.

To create culture, leaders must clearly identify the values and priorities of the organization. These values should be used as the foundation of all decision making and action taken within the organization. For example, Nordstrom attempts to create the value of respect and extraordinary customer service by telling stories that provide examples of the behavior they expect from their employees (Dyer et al., 2016). Peters (2011) explains the importance of creating a culture of empowerment and responsibility to quickly solve problems. To be able to continuously learns, the members of an organization must scrutinize the shared values element of the model and correct errors as needed (Peters, 2011).

Leaders must find a way to create their desired culture so that all stakeholders are operating with the same values and priorities. An explanation for which specific component(s) of the 7 S Model could be most challenging when implementing organizational change, including at least one supportive example In relation to my previous response, I believe that creating shared values in an organization could be the most challenging when implementing organizational change. As I mentioned above, leaders must find a way to ensure that everyone in the organization shares values, virtues, and priorities. If this does not happen, the members of the organization will be working with different agendas, which does not optimize the chances of creating and sustaining competitive advantage.

Furthermore, because shared values is one characteristic of an organization's culture, it greatly affects the style element of the 7-s Model. Leaders must understand the importance of creating shared values and more importantly, understand that shared values will take a long time to influence and change (Dyer et al., 2016). Changing style and shared values may take decades (Dyer et al., 2016). References Dyer, J.H., Godfrey, P., Jensen, R., & Bryce, D. (2016). Strategic management: Concepts and tools for creating real world strategy. Retrieved from Peters, T. (2011). McKinsey 7-S model. Leadership Excellence Essential, 28 (10), 7. Retrieved from

Paper For Above instruction

The McKinsey 7-S model, developed by McKinsey & Company in the 1980s, is a comprehensive framework for assessing and aligning critical organizational elements to ensure effective strategy implementation and sustainable competitive advantage (Dyer, Godfrey, Jensen, & Bryce, 2016). This model emphasizes seven interconnected components: strategy, structure, systems, skills, style, staffing, and shared values. Each of these elements plays a vital role in organizational effectiveness, and their alignment is crucial for successful change management initiatives.

At the heart of the 7-S model is strategy, which refers to an organization’s plan to establish and sustain competitive advantage through unique positioning, value-added differentiation, or cost leadership (Dyer et al., 2016). For example, Amazon’s relentless focus on customer service and technological innovation exemplifies a well-formulated strategy that supports its dominance in e-commerce. Strategy guides decision-making and resource allocation, with the aim of enhancing organizational performance and adapting to market shifts.

The structure component involves the formal configuration of roles, responsibilities, authority lines, and communication channels within the organization. An effective structure facilitates coordination and clarity; for instance, a matrix organizational structure can enable flexibility and cross-functional collaboration, which is particularly helpful during major change initiatives (Dyer et al., 2016). Proper structure aligns with strategy by enabling swift execution and accountability, thereby impacting overall effectiveness.

Systems refer to the formal and informal processes that support daily operations and strategic objectives. These include information management, workflow procedures, and performance measurement systems. For example, an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system integrates core business processes and ensures consistency across departments, thereby reinforcing strategic goals (Dyer et al., 2016). Well-designed systems create efficiencies and adaptability, which are essential during organizational change.

Staffing pertains to human resource policies—including recruitment, training, development, and retention—that ensure the organization has the right people with appropriate competencies. A company like Google invests heavily in employee development to sustain innovation and problem-solving skills (Dyer et al., 2016). Effective staffing strategies support the organization’s ability to implement change by ensuring personnel are aligned with new goals and culture.

Skills refer to the core competencies and capabilities of the organization’s workforce and leadership. For example, Apple’s emphasis on design and innovation demonstrates the importance of specialized skills tailored to strategic priorities (Dyer et al., 2016). Developing and nurturing key skills is essential for maintaining competitive advantage and facilitating organizational adaptation during change processes.

Style captures the organization’s leadership approach, decision-making processes, and interpersonal relationships. For instance, companies like Zappos foster a company culture rooted in employee empowerment and openness, which influences organizational agility (Dyer et al., 2016). Leadership style impacts how change is communicated, embraced, and sustained within the organizational culture.

Shared values, or core guiding principles, are central to creating organizational culture and guiding behavior. They serve as the foundation for all other elements (Dyer et al., 2016). Nordstrom’s emphasis on respect and customer service exemplifies how shared values shape organizational behavior. From a change management perspective, fostering shared values ensures that all stakeholders work cohesively toward common goals, facilitating smoother transitions and sustainability of change initiatives.

From a change management perspective, the shared values component holds particular significance due to its profound influence on organizational culture and employee behavior. As Peters (2011) notes, cultivating a culture of empowerment and shared purpose accelerates adaptation and resilience during change processes. For example, when a healthcare organization adopts a patient-centered approach, aligning shared values around compassion and quality care helps drive staff engagement and service improvements.

However, aligning and embedding shared values can be immensely challenging. One primary difficulty is that shared values are deeply ingrained within organizational culture and tend to evolve slowly over time (Dyer et al., 2016). For instance, attempting to shift a company’s core culture from hierarchical to collaborative involves significant time, effort, and strategic communication. Leaders must consistently articulate and reinforce new values while ensuring that these are reflected in policies, behaviors, and practices (Dyer et al., 2016).

Further challenges arise when organizational change conflicts with existing shared values. Resistance from employees rooted in longstanding cultural norms can hinder progress. For example, in a manufacturing firm transitioning toward a lean management philosophy focusing on continuous improvement, employees accustomed to traditional workflows may resist adopting new practices, requiring targeted change management interventions (Cameron & Green, 2015).

The style element, which covers leadership approach and interpersonal relationships, directly interacts with shared values. Leaders who embody and promote core shared values influence organizational norms and employee engagement. As Dyer et al. (2016) highlight, fostering a transparent, participative leadership style helps embed shared values more effectively, thus supporting change initiatives.

Implementing change successfully demands that organizations carefully consider these interconnected elements, especially shared values and style. Leaders must communicate a compelling vision, model desired behaviors, and involve employees at all levels to foster alignment. Patience and consistency are critical, as cultural change often unfolds gradually over years rather than months (Dyer et al., 2016).

References

• Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2015). Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. Kogan Page.
• Dyer, J. H., Godfrey, P., Jensen, R., & Bryce, D. (2016). Strategic management: Concepts and tools for creating real world strategy. Wiley.
• Peters, T. (2011). McKinsey 7-S model. Leadership Excellence Essentials, 28(10), 7.
• Boal, K. B., & Berthelsen, S. (2013). Why leaders fail and what they can do about it: Toward a model of resilience in leadership. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications, and Conflict, 17(1), 39–49.
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
• Huy, Q. N. (2001). In praise of middle managers. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 72–80.
• Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci.
• Burnes, B. (2017). Managing change (7th ed.). Pearson.