Lecture 9: Violence Against Women WMST 301 Professor Lawston

Lecture 9: Violence Against Women WMST 301 Professor Lawston Understanding Violence Against Women

Violence against women is pervasive in all cultures. Violence and the fear of violence are used to control women’s actions and bodies. Violence against women is produced at the intersections of race, class, and gender. Social institutions as well as individual men create and continue violence against women. Violence also occurs against others less powerful including children and those who cross gender boundaries.

Fraternities and Rape Culture (FF chap 42) According to the chapter, rapes occur frequently in fraternities (but not all fraternities) because the recruitment processes, structural characteristics, and treatment of women in fraternities produce a culture that accepts and promotes the sexual coercion of women. The authors argue that most fraternities are deeply concerned with definitions of masculinity that are grounded in aggression, competition, and heterosexuality. Some fraternities try to recruit men who exhibit these stereotypically male characteristics. Practices and structures in the fraternity such as the mistreatment of pledges, the focus on brotherhood, a concern about group loyalty, the use of alcohol, and the prevalence of violence and competition contribute to a rape culture.

The authors argue that women are treated as commodities by fraternities; they are used as bait (to attract recruits), as servers (filling men’s needs), and as sexual prey (conquest), and this can be found in the structural characteristics of fraternities (e.g., Little Sisters). These characteristics not only contribute to the prevalence of rape, but they also make it highly unlikely that fraternity men can be adequately prosecuted for their crimes. It is the fraternity as a group structure that contributes to the prevalence of rape in fraternities. According to the authors, fraternities must change dramatically before this can be stopped.

Reading 43: Mapping the Margins Crenshaw uses intersectionality theory to argue that race, class, and gender operate together to place many women in danger of violence and to prevent them from receiving help. She makes the case that the political strategies of the antiracist and feminist movements have often silenced debate about the needs of women of color; the antiracist movement has focused more on men, and the feminist movements have silenced women of color. Crenshaw’s arguments. Immigrant women are often forced to remain in abusive relationships to avoid being deported. Additionally, many of these women experience cultural and linguistic barriers to services for abused women.

Although many women of color experience domestic violence, anti-racist movements have silenced women’s concerns in order to counter stereotypes of minorities and to maintain family honor. It is likely that racism contributes to domestic violence. The feminist movement has broadened the public’s understanding of who is abused to include women of all racial and economic backgrounds, but it has done so in a way that often ignores the specific needs of women of color and addresses only the needs of white women. When violence against women was viewed as a minority problem, it was ignored, but it receives attention now that it is seen as a gender issue that relates to white women. Domestic-violence support services have often disregarded the needs of women of color and are often inaccessible to non-English speakers.

Paper For Above instruction

Violence against women (VAW) remains a critical issue affecting societies worldwide, transcending cultural, racial, and socio-economic boundaries. This widespread phenomenon is rooted not only in individual acts of aggression but also in systemic structures that sustain and perpetuate gender-based violence. The intersectionality of race, class, and gender plays a crucial role in shaping the experiences of violence and the accessibility of support for victims, especially women of color. Analyzing the interconnectedness of these factors reveals the complexities of combating violence against women and highlights the necessity of a multifaceted approach grounded in social justice theories.

At the societal level, violence against women is often maintained through cultural norms, institutional practices, and social institutions that reinforce gender inequalities. The lecture highlights how social constructs of masculinity—characterized by aggression, competitiveness, and heterosexuality—are ingrained in frat culture, contributing to a rape-supportive environment. Fraternities, as social institutions, often structure their practices around these male stereotypes, fostering a culture that normalizes sexual coercion and commodifies women (FF, chap 42). Women become objects of conquest, used as bait or commodities, further legitimizing violence and impeding justice due to the fraternity's collective structure.

Furthermore, the structural characteristics of fraternity environments, such as the emphasis on brotherhood loyalty, alcohol use, and violence, contribute significantly to the prevalence of sexual assault. This aligns with broader sociological theories on socialization and institutional reinforcement of gender roles. The normalization of these behaviors within fraternity culture exemplifies how social institutions can sustain violence, making intervention challenging. The culture of silence, group loyalty, and the difficulty in prosecuting fraternity members further complicate efforts to address college sexual assault, emphasizing the need for systemic reforms.

On a broader scale, the concept of intersectionality offers a vital lens for understanding how race, class, and gender simultaneously influence women's vulnerability to violence and their capacity to seek help. Crenshaw's intersectionality theory underscores how women of color often face layered disadvantages: cultural and linguistic barriers, immigration status, and societal stereotypes. For instance, immigrant women may remain in abusive relationships out of fear of deportation, while their access to resources is limited by language and cultural insensitivity within support systems (Crenshaw). These intersecting identities create unique challenges that are often overlooked in mainstream feminist and anti-racist advocacy, which historically have prioritized the needs of white women or marginalized men.

The struggle of women of color to access support and justice exemplifies structural violence rooted in systemic racism and sexism. Anti-racist movements, for example, have historically centered on racial issues and men's experiences, sidelining women's experiences within these frameworks. Similarly, feminist movements, despite broadening the understanding of abuse, have frequently failed to address the specific realities of women of color, further marginalizing their voices. This neglect perpetuates disparities in victimization rates and access to justice, illustrating how social movements can inadvertently reinforce systemic inequalities if they fail to adopt an intersectional perspective.

Finally, the social and political neglect of the specific needs of women of color exacerbates their vulnerability. Many immigrant women face cultural stigmas that discourage reporting abuse, coupled with language barriers that hinder access to services. The maintenance of family honor and societal stereotypes about minority communities sometimes silence victims and perpetuate abuse (Crenshaw). This highlights the importance of culturally competent support services and policies that recognize the diversity of women's experiences and challenges in seeking help.

In conclusion, understanding violence against women requires recognizing the interplay of social, cultural, and institutional forces, alongside the intersectional identities of victims. Addressing this deeply rooted problem necessitates structural reforms, culturally sensitive support systems, and a more inclusive feminist and anti-racist approach that amplifies marginalized voices. Only through recognizing these intersecting forces can society effectively combat violence against women and promote genuine gender equity and safety for all.

References

• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
• Gozdziak, E. M., & Colucci, E. (2005). Research on Human Trafficking in North America: A Review of Literature. Anthropology & Humanism, 30(2), 146-159.
• Hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. South End Press.
• Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men. Harper Collins.
• MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a Feminist Theory of State. Harvard University Press.
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
• Sen, G., & Grown, C. (1987). Development, Violence, and the Question of Rights. International Journal of Women's Studies, 10(3), 243-256.
• Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing Patriarchy. Blackwell.
• Yang, H., & Wang, Y. (2019). Cultural Factors and Domestic Violence in Immigrant Communities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(22), 4664–4683.
• Yoshihama, M., et al. (2005). Voices of Women of Color: Sexual Violence and the Intersection of Race, Class, and Gender. Violence Against Women, 11(10), 1251-1267.