Limited Liability Company (LLC) Collapse

Limited Liability Company (LLC) COLLAPSE Top of Formpeter And An

Peter and Andrew are considering forming a new business and need to evaluate several key factors, including entity formation, liability, taxation, capitalization, management, operation, and dissolution. A primary concern is whether they want to expose their personal assets to business debts or lawsuits. Kleinberger (2008) highlights that an LLC combines attributes of partnerships and corporations, providing personal asset protection (Kleinberger, 2008). This protection is significant compared to general partnerships, where personal assets are at risk (Melvin & Guerra-Pujol, 2018). Given their need to secure financing with collateral, and their desire to protect family land, forming an LLC appears to be the most advantageous choice. Their land, belonging to their grandfather, represents a valuable family legacy, and an LLC structure would help preserve this asset for future generations.

Another critical decision is whether Paul should join the business as a manager or in another role. A management agreement would specify duties and classify the LLC as either member-managed or manager-managed. In a member-managed LLC, all members have voting authority; in a manager-managed LLC, a designated manager handles daily operational decisions (Ibid, p. 474). Given Paul’s potential disagreements regarding church-related activities and his values, Peter and Andrew might consider excluding him from operational decision-making to maintain control aligned with their Christian principles. Alternatively, engaging Paul as a consultant might let them benefit from his expertise without risking conflicts of interest. Lastly, as a pass-through entity, the LLC’s profit and loss distribution must be outlined in the operating agreement, including taxation treatment and profit withdrawal strategies. Profits are taxed as self-employment income for Pete and Andrew, and they can choose to take a profit draw or leave funds in the business for expansion (Masters, n.d.).

Paper For Above instruction

The formation of a limited liability company (LLC) for Peter and Andrew's hunting and fishing lodge promises significant benefits, particularly in liability protection, taxation, and safeguarding family assets. An LLC offers a hybrid structure combining features of partnerships and corporations, making it an attractive choice compared to other business entities. This structure shields personal assets from business debts and lawsuits, which is paramount given their plan to secure financing through collateral and safeguard the family land owned by their grandfather. Such protection aligns with Kleinberger’s (2008) assertion that LLCs offer extensive liability shielding, combining flexibility in management and tax advantages (Kleinberger, 2008).

The decision regarding management structure is pivotal. Choosing between a member-managed LLC and a manager-managed LLC affects daily operations and decision-making authority. Given Paul’s potential disagreement with their Christian values, Peter and Andrew should consider a structure that maintains their control. Opting for a member-managed LLC enables the brothers to retain operational control, which is crucial for aligning the business with their vision and values. If Paul were to be involved, serving as a consultant rather than a manager, the brothers could benefit from his expertise without compromising their decision-making authority or values. This approach balances expert input while safeguarding their core principles.

Taxation considerations also influence their planning. As a pass-through entity, profits and losses pass directly to members and are reported on their individual tax returns, avoiding double taxation. This setup provides flexibility in profit distribution, allowing Peter and Andrew to decide whether to reinvest earnings into the business or withdraw profits for personal use. An operating agreement should delineate profit-sharing arrangements and how losses are allocated, ensuring clarity and compliance with IRS regulations (Masters, n.d.). Furthermore, the LLC’s ability to distribute profits at year-end provides flexibility in managing cash flow, supporting the growth and sustainability of the lodge.

In terms of liability, the LLC structure limits owners’ exposure to business obligations. According to Bulkat (2018), the company’s creditors generally cannot pursue personal assets of members unless they co-signed on loans or engaged in fraudulent activities. This protection encourages entrepreneurship while minimizing personal risk. However, owners may choose to assume joint liability by co-signing, which should be carefully considered in light of personal risk tolerance.

The potential inclusion of Paul as a co-owner warrants consideration. Given his past hesitations regarding church activities, a formal arrangement such as a high-ranking paid position or consultancy might be more prudent than full ownership. This preserves harmony and aligns with their mission of providing a faith-based retreat, which they believe will attract patronage and foster community. Formal contracts can specify contributions, roles, and profit-sharing, ensuring transparency and protecting the interests of all parties (Staff, 2018). If Paul’s involvement is limited to a contractual relationship, the Brothers can retain control while leveraging his expertise and network.

Regarding contributions to the business, valuing new key employees or investors involves assessing their financial input, skills, and strategic value. This process ensures fair equity or profit-sharing arrangements, fostering motivation and cooperation. The LLC can allocate profits annually based on capital contributions and other agreed-upon metrics, which the IRS recognizes as compliant (Master, 2016). Profit distribution methods should be clearly outlined to prevent disputes and facilitate smooth operation of the business.

In conclusion, structuring the hunting and fishing lodge as an LLC offers numerous advantages—protecting personal assets, providing operational flexibility, and offering favorable tax treatment. The decision to involve Paul should be carefully weighed, considering his values and contributions. The management and profit distribution strategies outlined in the operating agreement will be critical for the business’s success and longevity. Ultimately, a well-drafted LLC structure will help Peter and Andrew realize their vision of creating a family legacy that aligns with their faith and values, while providing a sustainable platform to serve their community and secure their family's future.

References

  • Kleinberger, D. S. (2008). The LLC as recombinant entity: Revisiting fundamental questions through the LLC lens. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 14(2), 473-510.
  • Melvin, M., & Guerra-Pujol, J. (2018). Business Law & the Regulation of Business. Cengage Learning.
  • Masters, T. (n.d.). How are profits split in an LLC? Retrieved from https://www.profits-split-llc-20063.html
  • Bulkat, B. (2018). When you might be personally liable for LLC or corporate debt. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/personal-liability.asp
  • Staff, I. (2018). Limited Liability Company – LLC. Investopedia. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/llc.asp
  • Master, T. (2016). LLC & profit distribution. Retrieved from https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/llc-profit-distribution
  • Proverbs 13:11. (n.d.). BibleGateway.com. Retrieved October 2023 from https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs+13%3A11&version=ESV
  • Kleinberger, D. S. (2009). The LLC as recombinant entity: Revisiting fundamental questions through the LLC lens. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 14(2), 473-510.
  • Master, T. (2016). LLC & profit distribution. Retrieved from https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/llc-profit-distribution
  • Staff, I. (2018). Limited Liability Company – LLC. Investopedia. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/llc.asp

Related Assignments