Literary Review Article Clark 2013 Used The Transdiscipline ✓ Solved

Literary Review Article 1clark 2013 Used The Transdisciplinary Appr

Clark (2013) utilized the transdisciplinary approach to shift the paradigm in the nursing profession toward a caring, love, healing approach when dealing with the phenomenon of resistance to change (ROC). The author emphasized that the nursing field has transitioned from an emphasis on technological and medical/cure-based modalities to a focus on humanism, spirituality, healing, and the lived interconnectedness of beings. The transdisciplinary approach considers values, ethics, and the personified lived experiences within the area of concern. To create a paradigm shift in ROC, nursing must explore problems and issues through a different lens.

The process involves creating an inquiry concentration that is analysis-driven rather than punishment-based, questioning definitive personal outlooks with a meta-paradigmatic approach, utilizing personal knowledge while striving for a broader understanding, and integrating the inquirer into the inquiry process. The questions are centered on the inquirer’s own experiences rather than predetermined disciplinary agendas. After gathering information, the inquirer navigates across disciplines to seek comprehensive knowledge.

Application to nursing practice highlights that the transdisciplinary approach can effectively address resistance to change. Clark (2013) further states that resistance to change in nursing academia mirrors resistance in personal life, often driven by fear, doubt, frustration, mistrust, confusion, and anger. Drawing from Florence Nightingale’s vision of nursing as kindness, love, and compassionate service, the author advocates for self-care and reflective practices to support individuals through change processes.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In the complex and ever-evolving landscape of healthcare, resistance to change (ROC) remains a significant barrier to progress within the nursing profession. Clark (2013) offers a transformative perspective by applying the transdisciplinary approach to address ROC, emphasizing a shift towards a more compassionate, holistic, and ethical framework. This paper explores Clark’s methodological insights, their relevance to contemporary nursing practice, and the implications for managing resistance in organizational settings.

Clark’s (2013) core argument is that traditional approaches to change management often fall short because they neglect the deeper human elements—values, emotions, ethics, and lived experiences—that shape individuals’ responses to change. The transdisciplinary approach breaks down disciplinary silos and encourages inquiry that is analysis-driven and personal. It challenges nurses and healthcare leaders to scrutinize problems from multiple perspectives, question their assumptions, and integrate knowledge across disciplines. Such an approach fosters understanding and creates a space for compassionate engagement with those resistant to change.

Implementing this approach involves a systematic process: first, establishing an inquiry focused on analysis rather than punishment; second, questioning personal outlooks with a meta-paradigmatic lens; third, utilizing personal and shared knowledge; fourth, incorporating the inquirer into the inquiry process; and finally, seeking knowledge across disciplines. Through this process, resistance is reframed from a barrier into an opportunity for reflection, growth, and transformation.

In practical terms, Clark’s (2013) framework has profound implications for nursing leadership. Leaders must cultivate an environment where inquiry and reflection are encouraged, and where ethical and emotional dimensions of change are acknowledged. This aligns with the foundational principles of nursing rooted in compassion, kindness, and healing—values championed by Florence Nightingale. Nightingale’s emphasis on caring and heartfelt connection underscores the importance of self-care and reflective practice in helping nurses and other healthcare workers navigate change gracefully.

Moreover, Clark’s approach advocates for viewing resistance not as failure but as an intrinsic part of the change process—an expression of underlying fears, doubts, or mistrust. Recognizing this allows leaders to develop targeted interventions such as open communication, emotional support, and participatory decision-making, which can mitigate resistance and foster commitment.

Inspired by Clark’s insights, integrating the transdisciplinary approach into nursing education and organizational culture can help future nurses develop the skills to address ROC compassionately and effectively. This involves fostering critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and ethical awareness, preparing nurses to navigate complex change scenarios with resilience and integrity.

However, the success of such approaches relies heavily on institutional support and a culture that values inquiry and ethical reflection. Institutions must prioritize ongoing education, leadership development, and a supportive environment that encourages transparent dialogue about change and resistance. Such systemic support enhances the ability of nurses and healthcare teams to adapt and thrive amid organizational transformations.

Conclusion

Clark’s (2013) application of the transdisciplinary approach offers a vital paradigm shift for addressing resistance to change in nursing. By emphasizing compassion, ethics, self-awareness, and cross-disciplinary inquiry, this framework empowers nurses and leaders to transform resistance from a destructive force into a catalyst for healing and growth. As healthcare continues to evolve rapidly, embracing such holistic and reflective methodologies will be essential in fostering resilient, ethical, and compassionate nursing practice.

References

• Clark, C. S. (2013). Resistance to change in the nursing profession: Creative transdisciplinary solutions. Retrieved July 2, 2017, from
• Jones, S. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2016). The Changing Nature of Change Resistance. Retrieved July 2, 2017, from
• Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 977-1002.
• Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. Jossey-Bass.
• Liu, S., & Wang, J. (2018). Emotional intelligence and resistance to organizational change: The mediating role of change self-efficacy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(3), 718–735.
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
• McKinley, W., & Schouten, J. W. (2008). The Ethics of Resistance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 547-569.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. L. (2009). Immunity to Change: How to Overcome It and Unlock Potential in Yourself and Your Organization. Harvard Business Press.