Literature Review Is A Research Paper About Your Topic

Literature Review Is A Research Paper About Your Topic Most Action R

Literature Review is a research paper about your topic. Most Action Research (AR) topics are very specific, you will most likely need to generalize your topics. For example, if your AR project involves collecting business requirements for a new system, you may not find academic research about collecting business requirements for a new system. You will be able to find research about business requirements and process change, 3-4 pages, minimum of eight (8) professional references.

Proposal – this is your plan. Review the template, which should provide you with some common ideas regarding how to document your proposal. Briefly summarize (a paragraph or two for) each of the proposed (AR) iteration (at least 4 iterations). Include a visual representation – (example provided in template).

Paper For Above instruction

The development of a comprehensive literature review and a structured proposal are essential components of successful action research projects. The objective of this paper is to explore the process of conducting a literature review related to a specific action research topic and to formulate a detailed proposal outlining the iterative steps involved in the research process. The literature review serves as a foundation for understanding existing knowledge, identifying gaps, and contextualizing the research within the broader academic framework. Meanwhile, the proposal provides a strategic plan for executing the action research, including multiple iterations aimed at achieving specific objectives over time.

Literature Review Approach

Given that action research (AR) topics tend to be highly specific, researchers often need to expand or generalize their focus to find applicable scholarly literature. For instance, an AR project targeting the collection of business requirements for a new system may not have a direct corresponding body of academic research. Instead, Relevant literature might include studies on requirements engineering, process change management, stakeholder engagement, and organizational development. A thorough review of such literature would encompass analyzing research articles, industry reports, and theoretical frameworks that relate to organizational change, requirements elicitation, and process improvement.

The literature review should span 3 to 4 pages and include at least eight credible professional references. These references could include peer-reviewed journal articles, authoritative books, and reputable industry publications. The purpose of this review is to synthesize existing research, identify best practices, and recognize gaps that your action research can address. For example, previous studies may highlight effective methodologies for requirements gathering or typical challenges encountered during organizational change initiatives, which can inform your project’s approach.

Proposal Planning and Iterative Process

The research proposal functions as a strategic plan that guides the execution of the action research project. It should be documented using a template, which may include sections such as objectives, methodology, expected outcomes, and ethical considerations.

A pivotal element of the proposal is outlining at least four iterations of the AR process. Each iteration represents a cycle of planning, action, observation, and reflection. Brief summaries of each iteration should be provided—each comprising a paragraph or two—detailing the specific activities, targeted goals, and anticipated results. For example, the first iteration might focus on stakeholder interviews to gather initial requirements, the second on analyzing collected data, the third on refining processes, and the fourth on validating findings through participant feedback.

Including a visual representation, such as a flowchart or timeline diagram, is essential to illustrate the iterative process. Such visuals help clarify the sequence of actions, how each iteration builds on the previous one, and the overall flow of the research project. This approach ensures clarity and provides stakeholders with an accessible overview of the research plan.

Conclusion

In summary, the integration of a comprehensive literature review and a detailed proposal with multiple iterations forms the backbone of a well-structured action research project. The literature review grounds the research within existing academic knowledge, while the proposal maps out a clear, cyclical plan for inquiry and improvement. By carefully selecting relevant sources and thoughtfully planning each iteration, researchers can systematically address complex organizational issues and contribute valuable insights to their field.

References

1. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Sage Publications.

2. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559-604). Sage.

3. Toulmin, S. (2001). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.

4. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

5. Brookfield, S. (2015). The skillful teacher: on technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. Jossey-Bass.

6. McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2010). All you need to know about action research. Sage.

7. Robson, C. (2011). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Wiley.

8. Stringer, E. T. (2013). Action research. Sage Publications.

9. Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2014). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Sage.

10. Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 423-449.