Literature Review Paper: The Literature Review Assignment

Question

Literature Review Paperthe Literature Review Assignment Should1be Fo The Literature Review assignment should: 1. Be formatted according to APA 6th edition standards. Two sources for APA formatting standards are: (a) American Psychological Association. (2010). Concise Rules of APA Style. 6th ed. Washington, DC: Author. ISBN: (b) 1. Show analysis of relevant alternatives, synthesis of the related information, and application of a critical thought process to develop assertions. 2. Contain in-text citations from at least 6 peer-reviewed articles to support assertions described in the paper. FORMAT OF LITERATURE REVIEW The body of the Literature Review assignment should contain the following sections: 1. Review of Literature: 1st paragraph of paper; describes objective of the literature review, overview of the topic under consideration, and specific topics that were researched to obtain information to write the Term Project Position Paper. 2. Documentation: 2nd paragraph of paper; describes where literature was obtained and how literature used to write the Term Project Position Paper was accessed. 3. Literature Review Discussion: (a) Subsequent paragraphs should contain a discussion about the selected literature sources, organized into those in ethical positions, unethical positions, and positions offering completely different arguments.

Dr. Jack HW Helper · Accepted Answer

This literature review aims to critically analyze the current scholarly discourse surrounding the ethical considerations in technology implementation within organizations. The primary objective is to synthesize relevant research findings to inform a well-rounded perspective on ethical versus unethical practices and divergent viewpoints in this domain. In doing so, the review considers various theoretical frameworks, case studies, and empirical research that highlight the complexities of ethical decision-making in technological contexts. To gather the necessary literature, comprehensive searches were conducted across academic databases such as PsycINFO, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and PubMed. Keywords included "technology ethics," "organizational ethics," "ethical decision-making in technology," and "misconduct in technological implementation." The selected peer-reviewed articles were critically appraised to ensure relevance and credibility. The literature was accessed primarily through university library subscriptions, online academic repositories, and open-access platforms. References were managed using Zotero, allowing for systematic categorization and synthesis during the writing process. The subsequent discussion is organized into three thematic sections based on the positions expressed in the literature. The first section covers ethical positions, emphasizing the importance of adhering to moral principles such as transparency, accountability, and fairness. Articles by Johnson (2019) and Chen (2021) argue that organizations benefiting from ethical technology practices foster greater trust and long-term sustainability. The second section addresses unethical positions, including practices involving data manipulation, privacy violations, and intentional deception. Studies by Lee and Kim (2020) and Patel (2022) document cases where unethical behaviors resulted in reputational damage and legal repercussions. The final section considers contrasting positions that challenge

Literature Review Paperthe Literature Review Assignment Should1be Fo

Paper For Above instruction

References

Related Assignments