Log Frame Jamisha Riddick Walden Program Evaluation ✓ Solved

Log Framejamisha Riddickwaldenuprogram Evaluationdr Tsepte

Log Frame for Training of Ex-Prisoners Components The program will consist of several components. The first one is the physical training on technical skills that will enable the ex-prisoners to get jobs in hardware, warehouses, stores, supermarkets, and other places. Another component of the program is the improvement of social behaviours. These activities will include one on one professional counselling, social interactions among ex-prisoners, and success stories from other prisoners who changed their lives and are now living well.

Objectives The first objective of the program is to equip ex-prisoners with skills that they may use to acquire jobs such as weaving, tailoring, drawing, and carving. By having these jobs, the ex-prisoners will become financially healthy and are likely to leave crime which is highly attributed to poor economic lives (Barkan, 2017). The program also aims at improving the social responsibility and morality of criminals and ex-prisoners so that they become more responsible ad acceptable in the community. It is a platform for trainees to transition to more responsibility and moving away from past life. The skills acquired will help them to have healthy social relationships with other members of society.

They will focus more on building themselves rather than engaging in activities that pose danger to themselves as well as the community. This period of training will also be a chance to heal from social issues such as drug and substance abuse. Outputs and Outcomes The first output projection is to reduce the rate of crime in society. According to research, high crime rates are attributed to low levels of unemployment. Most youths have poor living standards which force them to engage in unhealthy activities that lead them to prison.

The next outcome is to have a society that is characterized by peace and harmony whereby people do not view each other as enemies. For ex-prisoners, it has always been hard for people to accept them back in the community. By having this program, they will be more shaped and learn to interact with members of the community well. The other outcome is to improve the living standards of the ex-prisoners by offering them jobs that will sustain them and enhance their financial wellness. The result will be a society of independence, good health, economic stability, and fulfilment.

Causal Linkages Despite efforts to improve the lives of the ex-prisoners and reduce the rates of crime in society, some factors may lead to undesired outcomes from the program. The first causal linkage is the lack of enough resources that may lower the effectiveness of the program hence leading to low-quality outputs. For example, the trainers require some resources for practical guides on technical skills. If the resources are inadequate the trainees may fail to acquire enough skills (kroner et al., 2017). Consequently, they will end up failing to deliver in the job market and resort to crime.

Another linkage is between lack of training and advocacy experts which may lead to poor results, especially on social behaviours. For an ex-prisoner to change, they must interact with professional counsellors and advocates who must steer them to change. Lack of qualified counsellors may lead to undesired outcomes such as worse behaviours. The attitude of the trainees towards the program also affects the quality of the output. Only those who are willing to learn and change will be impacted.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Rehabilitation of ex-prisoners is a critical aspect of criminal justice systems worldwide, aiming to facilitate their reintegration into society and reduce recidivism rates. A comprehensive program that combines technical training and social behavioral interventions can serve as an effective strategy to achieve these goals. This paper explores the design, objectives, expected outcomes, and challenges associated with implementing a training program for ex-prisoners, grounded in the principles of logical framework analysis.

Introduction

The high prevalence of unemployment and social marginalization among ex-prisoners significantly contributes to recidivism. Many former inmates lack the skills and social support necessary for successful reintegration, leading to a cycle of re-offending and imprisonment. Addressing this issue requires integrated programs that focus on skill development, social rehabilitation, and community acceptance. Logframe or logical framework approaches provide a structured methodology to plan, implement, and evaluate such interventions effectively (Mbatha et al., 2020).

Program Components

The program under review comprises multiple components designed to address both economic and social dimensions of reentry. Firstly, technical skills training encompasses activities such as tailoring, carpentry, plumbing, weaving, and drawing, aimed at enhancing employability (Ahmad et al., 2017). These practical skills are vital in equipping ex-prisoners with income-generating activities, thereby reducing their reliance on criminal activities for economic survival.

Secondly, social behavioral interventions focus on counseling sessions, peer interactions, and sharing success stories. These efforts aim to rebuild social responsibility, develop morality, and foster community acceptance of ex-prisoners (Ganapathy, 2018). Improving social skills also aids in reducing stigma and prejudice that often hinder reintegration.

Objectives and Rationale

The core objectives include equipping ex-prisoners with marketable skills to facilitate employment and income generation, thereby promoting economic independence. The program also seeks to improve social responsibility and morality, helping participants develop healthier social relationships and adapt to societal norms. Such objectives are supported by research indicating that employment and social cohesion substantially lower the likelihood of re-offending (Duwe, 2017).

Expected Outcomes and Indicators

Positive outcomes anticipated include a reduction in the rate of re-offending, improved societal perceptions of ex-prisoners, and enhanced economic stability among participants. Indicators for measuring success encompass employment rates among ex-prisoners, recidivism statistics, community acceptance levels, and improvements in social and psychological well-being (Urban Institute, 2014). For instance, a decline in re-offending by a significant percentage would demonstrate program effectiveness.

Challenges and Causal Linkages

Implementation challenges include resource constraints, such as insufficient funding for training facilities, qualified trainers, and counseling personnel. As revealed by Krӧner et al. (2019), inadequate resources can compromise training quality and social support, leading to suboptimal outcomes. Additionally, the attitude and readiness of ex-prisoners to participate are pivotal; only willing individuals benefit fully.

Another critical linkage involves professional support systems. Lack of qualified counselors may impede social behavior change, inadvertently resulting in increased antisocial tendencies or relapse. Furthermore, societal stigma remains a formidable barrier, often undermining the reintegration process despite individual efforts. Developing community awareness and acceptance is thus fundamental to program success.

Evaluation and Recommendations

Ongoing evaluation using the logical framework matrix helps identify gaps and areas for improvement. Continuous stakeholder engagement, including government agencies, NGOs, and community leaders, enhances resource mobilization and societal acceptance. To maximize effectiveness, expanding funding, increasing trained personnel, and implementing awareness campaigns are recommended.

Conclusion

The training of ex-prisoners through a structured logframe approach offers promising avenues for reducing recidivism and fostering social cohesion. By addressing both skills and social behaviors, such programs can transform former offenders into responsible citizens. Overcoming resource limitations and societal stigma remains essential to realizing the full potential of these interventions.

References

  • Barkan, S. E. (2017). The value of quantitative analysis for a critical understanding of crime and society. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(2), 287-298.
  • Duwe, G. (2017). The use and impact of correctional programming for inmates on pre-and post-release outcomes. National Institute of Justice.
  • Ganapathy, N. (2018). Rehabilitation, reintegration, and recidivism: a methodological reflection. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 28(3), 198-210.
  • Krӧner, D. G., Polaschek, D. L., Serin, R. C., & Skeem, J. L. (2019). An exploration of the symmetry between crime-causing and crime-reducing factors: Implications for offender services. Psychological Services, 16(2), 329-339.
  • Mbatha, C. M., Kerre, B. W., Ferej, A., Kitainge, K. M., & Fred, K. C. (2020). Learning Strategies Employed in Vocational Education Training on Integration of Prisoners into the Society. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 321-330.
  • McDavid, J. C., Huse, I., & Hawthorn, L. R. L. (2019). Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Urban Institute. (2014). Outcome indicators project. Retrieved from https://www.urban.org/research/publication/outcome-indicators

Related Assignments