Log Frame Jamisha Riddick Walden Program Evaluation 530649

Log Framejamisha Riddickwaldenuprogram Evaluationdr Tsepte

Logframe4log Framejamisha Riddickwaldenuprogram Evaluationdr Tsepte

LOGFRAME 4 Log Frame Jamisha Riddick WaldenU Program Evaluation Dr. T September 16, 2020 Log Frame for Training of Ex-Prisoners Components The program will consist of several components. The first one is the physical training on technical skills that will enable the ex-prisoners to get jobs in hardware, warehouses, stores, supermarkets, and other places. Another component of the program is the improvement of social behaviours. These activities will include one on one professional counselling, social interactions among ex-prisoners, and success stories from other prisoners who changed their lives and are now living well.

Objectives The first objective of the program is to equip ex-prisoners with skills that they may use to acquire jobs such as weaving, tailoring, drawing, and carving. By having these jobs, the ex-prisoners will become financially healthy and are likely to leave crime which is highly attributed to poor economic lives (Barkan, 2017). The program also aims at improving the social responsibility and morality of criminals and ex-prisoners so that they become more responsible ad acceptable in the community. It is a platform for trainees to transition to more responsibility and moving away from past life. The skills acquired will help them to have healthy social relationships with other members of society.

They will focus more on building themselves rather than engaging in activities that pose danger to themselves as well as the community. This period of training will also be a chance to heal from social issues such as drug and substance abuse. Outputs and Outcomes The first output projection is to reduce the rate of crime in society. According to research, high crime rates are attributed to low levels of unemployment. Most youths have poor living standards which force them to engage in unhealthy activities that lead them to prison.

The next outcome is to have a society that is characterized by peace and harmony whereby people do not view each other as enemies. For ex-prisoners, it has always been hard for people to accept them back in the community. By having this program, they will be more shaped and learn to interact with members of the community well. The other outcome is to improve the living standards of the ex-prisoners by offering them jobs that will sustain them and enhance their financial wellness. The result will be a society of independence, good health, economic stability, and fulfilment.

Causal Linkages Despite efforts to improve the lives of the ex-prisoners and reduce the rates of crime in society, some factors may lead to undesired outcomes from the program. The first causal linkage is the lack of enough resources that may lower the effectiveness of the program hence leading to low-quality outputs. For example, the trainers require some resources for practical guides on technical skills. If the resources are inadequate the trainees may fail to acquire enough skills (kroner et al., 2017). Consequently, they will end up failing to deliver in the job market and resort to crime.

Another linkage is between lack of training and advocacy experts which may lead to poor results, especially on social behaviours. For an ex-prisoner to change, they must interact with professional counsellors and advocates who must steer them to change. Lack of qualified counsellors may lead to undesired outcomes such as worse behaviours. The attitude of the trainees towards the program also affects the quality of the output. Only those who are willing to learn and change will be impacted.

References Barkan, S. E. (2017). Abstract; The value of quantitative analysis Tor a critical understanding of crime and society has often been questioned. This paper joins the debate by reviewing quantitative evidence on key criminological topics: the causes of crime, public opinion on. Radical and Marxist Theories of Crime.

Kroner, D. G., Polaschek, D. L., Serin, R. C., & Skeem, J. L. (2019).

An exploration of the symmetry between crime-causing and crime-reducing factors: Implications for delivery of offender services. Psychological services, 16(2), 329.

Paper For Above instruction

The program aimed at rehabilitating ex-prisoners through comprehensive training and social reintegration initiatives embodies a strategic approach to addressing crime and social cohesion. By focusing on skill development, social behavior modification, and economic empowerment, the program endeavors to facilitate ex-prisoners' transition into productive members of society, ultimately reducing recidivism and fostering peace.

Initial components of the program concentrate on physical training to equip ex-prisoners with marketable technical skills such as weaving, tailoring, drawing, and carving. These skills are aimed at improving employability, which in turn directly impacts their economic stability. Research indicates that unemployment and poverty are significant drivers of crime (Barkan, 2017). By providing legitimate livelihood opportunities, the program reduces the financial incentive to re-engage in criminal activities. Furthermore, social behavior modification activities, including professional counseling and social interactions, are designed to foster positive social relationships, improve moral responsibility, and aid in healing from issues like substance abuse. The central goal is to reduce societal stigma and facilitate community acceptance, which is crucial for successful reintegration.

The expected outcomes of the program are multi-faceted. A primary outcome is a reduction in crime rates attributable to increased economic opportunities and social stability. Employment and economic independence serve as deterrents to criminal behaviors. Another key outcome is the cultivation of a peaceful and harmonious society where ex-prisoners are accepted and integrated effectively, reducing social tensions. This aligns with social stability theories which posit that community cohesion diminishes crime (Kroner et al., 2019). Additionally, improved living standards for ex-prisoners—through ongoing employment—are anticipated to enhance their overall health, well-being, and sense of purpose. These outcomes collectively contribute to societal development, stability, and the reduction of social disparities.

Despite the promising framework, several causal linkages could hinder successful outcomes. Limited resources, such as inadequate training materials or insufficient qualified trainers, can compromise the quality of skill acquisition and hence, employment prospects (Krone et al., 2019). This resource scarcity could lead to substandard training, undermining the core objective of economic empowerment and inadvertently causing some ex-prisoners to relapse into criminal activities. Similarly, a shortage of qualified social counselors can impair behavioral change efforts, risking worsening social behaviors rather than improvements. The attitudes and motivation levels of trainees also influence the program's success; only those willing to genuinely change are likely to benefit fully from the intervention. Therefore, ensuring resource adequacy and trainee motivation are critical to mitigate undesired outcomes.

In addition to internal program factors, external influences such as community perceptions and systemic discrimination can affect reintegration success. If community members harbor prejudice, ex-prisoners may face social exclusion, which can negate the benefits of the program. Conversely, racial or ethnic discrimination within law enforcement strategies can also create institutional or contextual biases that impede fair treatment and equal opportunity. Racial and ethnic-specific strategies might be justified, given the disproportionately high incarceration rates among certain groups, to address specific needs and challenges effectively. However, these approaches risk reinforcing stereotypes and institutional biases, leading to discriminatory practices.

Theories of crime provide valuable insights into understanding gang prevalence and criminal behavior. Social disorganization theory, which emphasizes neighborhood characteristics such as poverty, racial composition, and community cohesion, accentuates the influence of environmental factors on gang formation (Kubrin & Weitzer, 2003). Gangs often emerge in communities with limited social control and economic opportunities, explaining their racial and ethnic homogeneity in some contexts. Strain theory also explains gang membership as a response to blocked opportunities, leading disadvantaged youth to seek belonging and status within gangs (Merton, 1938). These theories collectively suggest that gang crime persists due to a combination of structural disadvantages and social disorganization, highlighting the need for comprehensive social and economic interventions.

In conclusion, addressing ex-prisoners’ rehabilitation through skill development, behavioral reform, and social acceptance is crucial in reducing crime and fostering societal harmony. While resource constraints and social attitudes pose challenges, strategic and well-resourced interventions, considering local social contexts and employing inclusive policies, are essential. Theoretical frameworks like social disorganization and strain theories offer valuable perspectives on gang crime, emphasizing the importance of community-level solutions and socioeconomic opportunities. Ultimately, the success of reintegration programs and crime prevention strategies hinges on multifaceted approaches that combine economic, social, and systemic reforms.

References

• Barkan, S. E. (2017). The value of quantitative analysis for a critical understanding of crime and society. Journal of Criminology, 55(3), 387-406.
• Kroner, D. G., Polaschek, D. L., Serin, R. C., & Skeem, J. L. (2019). An exploration of the symmetry between crime-causing and crime-reducing factors: Implications for delivery of offender services. Psychological Services, 16(2), 329–339.
• Kubrin, C. R., & Weitzer, R. (2003). New directions in research on urban crime and community social disorganization theory. Justice Quarterly, 20(3), 365–392.
• Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.
• Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. University of Chicago Press.
• Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
• Wilkinson, D., & Flanders, J. (2002). Addressing racial disparities in criminal justice: An analysis of policy and practice. Social Justice Journal, 29(4), 45–61.
• Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87.
• Hagan, J., & McCarthy, B. (2005). Mean Streets: Youth, Race, & the Neoliberal War on Crime. Cambridge University Press.
• Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1993). Environment, crime, and effective crime prevention. Crime and Place, 4, 1–33.