Long Essay Questions Require A Response Minimum
Long Essay Questions Questions Require A Response Minimum Ofthree Par
Research the information and paraphrase your response to the question with cited academic data. The APA process is required and is important that students correctly identify scholarly sources. Do not cut and paste - Safe Assign is used to prevent plagiarism.
It is highly advisable to first answer the questions in a Word document and then copy and paste into the exam.
Paper For Above instruction
1. Many organizations are changing the focus of Human Resources, even going so far as to change the name of the function. In the middle part of last century, the term Human Resource Management started to replace the notion of the “Personnel Department”. Now, the terms are being rebranded again to titles such as the following: “Vice President of People”; Head of Associate Experience; Chief Experience Officer; Chief Talent Officer; or even “Chief Happiness Officer”. What do these title changes say about the direction of Human Resources? Has the focus of what HR does changed or have we merely changed the wording?
The evolution of titles within Human Resources reflects a broader transformation in organizational priorities and philosophies. Traditionally, the Personnel Department was primarily responsible for administrative functions such as payroll, hiring, and compliance. As organizations recognized the strategic value of human capital, the term shifted to Human Resource Management, emphasizing a more integrated approach to managing employees as assets contributing to organizational goals (Ulrich & Brockbank, 2005). Recently, the emergence of titles like “Chief Happiness Officer” or “Vice President of People” indicates a further shift toward a people-centric philosophy, prioritizing employee experience, engagement, and well-being over mere administrative tasks (Brewster et al., 2016). These rebranded titles suggest that HR's focus has increasingly moved from transactional processes to strategic development—cultivating workplace culture, fostering talent retention, and enhancing organizational performance through employee satisfaction (Cascio & Boudreau, 2016).
While some may argue that these changes are largely semantic, they signify a genuine transformation in HR’s role within organizations. The emphasis on terms such as “Happiness” or “Experience” highlights a recognition that engaged and satisfied employees positively impact productivity, innovation, and profitability (Harter, Schmidt, & Hayes, 2002). Essentially, these title changes mirror an underlying shift from traditional administrative functions toward strategic human capital management. Therefore, the focus of HR has indeed evolved, moving beyond mere titles to a broader strategic role that aligns human capital with organizational success (Michaels, Handfield-Jones, & Axelrod, 2001).
References
- Brewster, C., Chung, C., & Sparrow, P. (2016). Globalizing human resource management. Routledge.
- Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). The search for global competence: From international HR to talent management. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 103-114.
- Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279.
- Michaels, E., Handfield-Jones, H., & Axelrod, B. (2001). The war for talent. Harvard Business Press.
- Ulrich, D., & Brockbank, W. (2005). The HR value proposition. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 98-107.
Paper For Above instruction
2. Employee engagement is widely recognized as a critical factor in organizational success. It pertains to the emotional commitment and involvement of employees towards their organization and its goals. Engaged employees are more likely to perform at high levels, exhibit organizational citizenship behaviors, and stay committed to their employers (Saks, 2006). One fundamental reason engagement is so vital lies in its positive correlation with productivity. Employees who are engaged tend to be more motivated and produce higher quality work, leading to improved organizational performance (Hakanen & Roodt, 2010). Furthermore, engaged employees reduce turnover rates, which lowers costs associated with recruiting and training new staff (Shuck & Wollard, 2010). They also contribute to a positive workplace atmosphere, which enhances collaboration and innovation. The health benefits of a satisfied workforce extend to lower absenteeism and reduced stress levels, ultimately fostering a resilient organizational culture (Kahn, 1990).
Research indicates that employee engagement yields tangible benefits such as increased profitability, customer satisfaction, and better financial results (Harter, Schmidt, & Hayes, 2002). For example, Gallup reports consistently demonstrate that companies with highly engaged workforces outperform their counterparts financially (Harter et al., 2016). These benefits underscore the importance of fostering engagement through recognition, development opportunities, and meaningful work. Engaged employees feel valued and aligned with organizational goals, leading to sustained performance and competitive advantage (Macey & Schneider, 2008). Therefore, organizations that prioritize engagement are better equipped to navigate competitive markets and adapt to change efficiently.
While employee engagement is critically important across all organization types, its relative significance may vary. For instance, highly customer-focused sectors such as hospitality or retail place even greater importance on engagement, as employee attitudes directly influence customer experience and satisfaction (Kang & Perdue, 2017). Conversely, highly automated or manufacturing-centric industries may experience differing impacts; however, engaged employees still contribute to operational efficiency and safety. Small startups often rely heavily on high engagement to create a cohesive culture; whereas larger corporations might emphasize engagement as part of their talent retention strategy. Overall, though, evidence suggests that engagement universally contributes to organizational success, regardless of industry type, but its strategic emphasis may differ based on organizational goals and structure (Saks, 2006).
Human Resources plays a fundamental role in creating and fostering employee engagement. This involves designing strategic initiatives that promote employee participation, recognition, and development (Kular et al., 2008). HR practices such as effective onboarding, continuous training, and performance management systems help instill a sense of purpose and belonging among employees (Saks, 2006). Additionally, HR can facilitate open communication, ensure fair policies, and incorporate employee feedback into decision-making processes, thereby enhancing trust and commitment (Bakker & Demerouti, 2008). HR professionals also lead efforts to cultivate a positive organizational culture that advocates work-life balance, diversity, and employee well-being, which are closely linked with engagement (Luthans & Youssef, 2007). By aligning HR strategies with organizational objectives, HR functions can significantly influence levels of employee engagement, ultimately contributing to long-term organizational success (Kahn, 1990).
References
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223.
- Gallup. (2016). State of the American Workplace: Employee Engagement Insights. Gallup Press.
- Hakanen, J. J., & Roodt, G. (2010). Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and engagement. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1-13.
- Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279.
- Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
- Kang, H., & Perdue, R. R. (2017). Hospitality employee engagement: A review and future directions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 65, 1-9.
- Kular, S., G Sunday, M., & Carter, M. (2008). Employee engagement: A literature review. Journal of Management & Organization, 14(4), 434-463.
- Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Positive organizational behavior. Psychology Press.
- Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.
- Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.