Turnitin Originality Report Confederate Essay

Turnitin Originality Reportconfederate Essay

Turnitin Originality Reportconfederate Essay

Turnitin Originality Report Confederate essay by Armita Namiranian From Confederates! (HIST 20 - Amer Hist to 1870) Processed on 13-May-2013 7:51 AM PDT ID: Word Count: 1208 Similarity Index 31% Similarity by Source Internet Sources: 31% Publications: 0% Student Papers: 0% sources: % match (Internet from 01-Aug-% match (Internet from 02-Dec-2011) paper text: Armita Namiranian 05/08/2013 Dispatches from unfinished civil war The Pulitzer Prize winner Horwitz took an eye-opening journey in Southern part of America, where his childhood fascination with Confederacy collides was with hard adult certainty about culture and race in America. Having been brought up in Virginia, Horwitz decorated rebel heroes on his attic bedroom walls.

After a decade of covering foreign wars, Horwitz returned home and launched a one year ramble through a landscape of the Civil War; he travelled from Virginia to the Alabama searching for explanations for America’s continuous interest in conflict. He accompanied the hard-core re-enactor, who was obsessed with authenticity. The re-enactor specialty that is “bloating†in the imitation of a corpse, putted Horwitz in demand with filmmakers and artists on, “Civil Wargasm†the whirlwind seven-day journey of battlegrounds. Horwitz visited Shelby Foote together with lesser known historians such as Jimmy Algiers, and eccentric storekeeper who folk museum sports the life- size figurine of the Robert E.

Lee prepared from sheetrock. After trading notes with the park rangers, he discovered that a lot of what he knows is a myth and the fact is that the historical misrepresentation at the federally sustained battlefields is often abetted by confined boosters. One morning Horwitz was awakened by a crackle of the musket fire, and he started filing the front-line dispatches once more this time since the war in the home country, and were close to his heart (Horwitz 425). Horwitz childhood impressions of American heritage in civil war 1from his psyche relatively natural in the cultural context of the adulthood, 1Horwitz brings into this wild journey the tortured past and bewildering present the style and expertise he expended on the variety of assignments in different publications, since the Wall Street Periodical to The New Yorker and Harper’s.

Horwitz remembered Robert Penn Warren’s remark, which grandsons experience the full imaginative appeal of civil war as a ritual of becoming American. Horwitz grandfather, who was a Jew, 1came to America seventeen years after the Appomattox (Horwitz 435). He sensed that the history of civil war was the American Talmud to unlock his secrets of American his adopted country, as well as making him become part of the history. In Connecticut, 1New Haven, he passed this to his own son who later passed it to Tony Horwitz. Tony reproduced images such as medieval illuminate, on his attic bedroom walls.

After a period of 1nine years in different foreign countries, Horwitz went to Virginia, a place where he discovered that American are obsessed with war in different ways that motivated his own sunken memories of many photographs he studied when he was a child, activating his 1obsessions very severely that it made his Australian wife to refer to him as “civil war boreâ€. Horwitz plotted his own hardcore campaign against civil war one night after pondering on civil war obsession. His aim 1was to spend about a year on civil war, searching for people and place with memory of conflict alive in current days (Arnold and Roberta 108). Horwitz traveled to the Western Southern and Eastern states where the big battles waged, as well as 1pictured in the etchings his grandfather revealed to him through the magnifying glass.

Horwitz power to magnify the emotional impact, as well as the importance 1of details evolved from childhood to a skill that is enjoyable to watch. At Monument Avenue in the Richmond, for example, he had this insight that he could not think of any other 1city in the world, which lined its avenues with stone leviathans reverencing failed rebels against the state. Horwitz’s re-enactor comrade Rob took him on what Rob referred to as the civil Wargasm. Rob told Horwitz that his true calling is a civil war bum. By experiencing what Rob referred to as “period rush†Horwitz became captive of the past.

Several chapters later, Horwitz confessed that he could not glance at a calendar without attaching the parallel dates since the 1860s (Arnold and Roberta 109). Horwitz was 1myriad- minded through temperament, however, even his comrade was single-minded exhibited it in behavior and speech at each turn of twisted road in the past. Rob explained how he evolved along the two paths, and became what he is currently. Roving at the speed soldiers of the civil war never imagined over consecrated places to make an impression to 1Horwitz with accounts of heroic times, Rob consumed fables and facts of the war. Horwitz wielded 1humor as the shield against the hydra-headed monster of the obsession, at the end it failed to save him.

Horwitz felt nearly no ideological relationship with the unreconstructed rebels he realized that these rebels were right. The matters at hand in civil war particularly remained unresolved and raw. Horwitz journey made him understand obsession of others, although he felt strangely not able to explain. 1As a persistent qualifier to the underlying purpose, which could not be serious, Horwitz humor cause 1effect of the luring and later lulling to readers who thought preoccupation with civil war is ludicrous. Such readers came from Horwitz’s battleground sight more open than they were before to probable ways of feeling and seeing the relevance of war to their lived (Kingseed 104).

In Virginia State, Horwitz joined the band of the ‘hardcore’ re-enactors who were involved in crash-diet in order 2to achieve a hollow-eyed view of starved Confederates. In the Kentucky, Horwitz witnessed Klan rallies, as well as calls for the race war ignited by killing of the white man who brandished the rebel flag. At the Andersonville, Horwitz found that the commander of the prison was executed in the claim that he was a war criminal, and currently he is exalted as a hero and martyr. In the climax of the book, 2Horwitz takes the marathon trek from the Antietam to Gettysburg and finally to Appomattox together with the Robert Lee Hodge, an unconventional pilgrim who named their odyssey ‘Civil Wargasm’ (Kingseed 105).

2Propelled by the boyhood passion for Civil War, Tony embarked on the search for people and places still detained in the thrall through the America’s greatest conflict. This journey resulted into 2an adventure for the soul of Unvanquished south, a lace where ghosts of Lost Cause were resurrected through remembrance and ritual. Horwitz visited many sites throughout the South; he encountered the unreconstructed rebels who practiced the outdated beliefs. Horwitz met groups of re-enactors devotees who tried to relive the experience of soldier’s death and life. He brings to live old battlefields, as well as new courts, 2country bars, where previous and present collide, and often in the explosive ways.

One of the Horwitz most disheartening but yet unsurprising realizations are the attitudes towards civil war that divided people along racial lines. A majority of whites covered the memory in the nostalgia, and refused to search beneath the myth, whilst most blacks dismissed the civil war as worthless to them and to their current existence. Work Cited Horwitz, Tony. Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War. New York: Vintage Books, 1999.

Internet resource. Arnold, James R, and Roberta Wiener. American Civil War: The Essential Reference Guide. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO, 2011. Print.

Kingseed, Cole C. The American Civil War. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 2004. Print. Case Study Officer Robert Barton Letrice Atkins CJA/474 September 28, 2013 Dr. Patrick Webb 1 CASE STUDY OFFICER ROBERT BARTON 3 Case Study Officer Robert Barton Upon complete of the police academy cadets are required to take an oath. Officers swear to honor the relationships between fellow officers. First, they must understand the law before he or she can enforce it. In this case study officer Barton’s desires were to stand up for what is right. Barton’s goals were to preserve the peace, and protect society from criminals.

However, Officer Barton became a part of a culture that shared diverse values, attitudes, and perspectives. Soon Barton conformed to the social norms of the group and adapted to the actions of the group to accomplish his success. Barton became aware of the officers code of silence one that he does not agree with, but he must support for the success of the department (More, Vito, &Walsh, 2012). Group Cohesiveness Group cohesiveness exists when a group develops a bond with one another and adopts the same behaviors to fit in, or reduce disagreement between group members. Cohesiveness ceases to become positive when personalities within the group begin to clash, and the social role of members or leaders are terminated. Too much cohesiveness becomes pathological when members fear losing power or become isolated. It discourages individuality, critical thinking, and innovation. Pathological is a primary characteristic of groupthink. This occurs when the members of the group aim for total agreement and acceptance within the group. Any behavior from inside or outside that harms their motivation to think freely will be unacceptable. Pathological can create tension and the mentality of “us versus them.†“Them†refers to anyone not a part of the group. Groupthink can encourage the view of untouchable (More, Vito, & Walsh, 2012). Subcultures Subcultures in police work are inevitable because the police profession has subcultures unto itself. In this case a group of officers came from different cultures with different attitudes, and values, even though they share the same profession. Officers profession causes him or her to belong subconsciously to a social subculture. Social norms strongly influence the behaviors of officers. Instead of practicing employee code of ethics some officers develop personal code of ethics in the unit and new officers adapt to the mentality of the unit to feel a part of the team. The personal codes set them apart from the rest of society because officers are respected and have the responsibility of protecting society. Second, because they share similar dangers, stress levels, and rewards that other people do not see. Third, the danger of them against us mentality. The we references to politicians and concerned citizens who are aware officers that do not play by the rules. In some minority neighborhoods police are not respected and viewed as a cover up for the department. In extreme cases, such as Robert Tolan shot by a Bellaire police officer at his home. These types of occurrences results in citizens becoming less cooperative and trusting of officers (More, Vito, & Walsh, 2012). Police Administrator Controlling misconduct involves two main tasks first preventing it from taking place and second reducing it once it happens. Internal approaches within the department in the training phases of policing should take place to prevent corruption in selection process. Managers will develop clear written policies and procedures that states corruption will not be tolerated. Violations of the policies will result in disciplinary action. The next focus will be a controlled environment. This will include increased supervision of line officers, increase manager’s responsibilities for combating corruption and eliminating department practices that encouraged corruption example meeting at the end of the month quotas or the amount arrest required in an eight hour -shift. Departments will expand the internal affairs division to investigate reports of internal corruption (More, Vito, & Walsh, 2012). The external approach considered for the department would be unbiased controlled units will investigate corruption. The use of mass media to expose corruption, mobilizes public opinion, and provides the chief with support for anti-corruption policy, that will be unfavored with officers. Increase community involvement to ensure the community has a voice and believe they are protected by police. Finally an increased review boards and oversight committees will investigate allegations of police misconduct. This approach will reduce opportunities for corruption and misconduct (More, Vito, & Walsh, 2012). Reference More, H., Vito, G., & Walsh, W. (2012). Organizational behavior and management in law enforcement (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: NJ Prentice. Although it is expected that students already know the particulars of college level writing, sometimes converting a topic into a great thesis statement can be a bit of a challenge! Below are some steps to take to help get your thesis statement ready for your Essay: . . Thesis Statement Formulation: A thesis is a statement that clearly lays out a topic of research and discusses the main point(s) to be made by the research. A thesis is not a summary of a question or a basic sentence of fact, but is an argument that can be proven by the evidence gained by your research. . The Thesis Tests: 1. Is this a complete sentence (and not a question)? 2. Does it have an opposing argument? 3. Is every word clear and unambiguous in meaning? 4. Will the thesis require proof from the book to prove it? (If so, then good job!!!) 5. Does the statement make such a large claim that the writer has no hope of proving it to be true in the space of this assignment? If so, go back and check the question you are trying to answer, and revise your thesis to make your main points clear and specific. . Remember: A thesis will often require adjustment after the paper is written! What you intend to prove may be different from what actually is proven when the paper is done. Be sure to go back and be sure your thesis matches your body of evidence and your conclusion. Please date it on 5/5/2013 CONFEDERATES IN THE ATTIC ESSAY ASSIGNMENT Essay Parameters: 1. 4 pages (minimum). 2. Double spaced. 3. Written in college level English. 4. Uploaded to Turnitin via the link in this folder on the due date (see Syllabus). 6. 12 pt font 7. 1 inch margins 8. Must have a developed thesis statement that is followed by the information provided in the paper. 9. Quotes and cited paraphrasing are good for this kind of paper! 10. Cite where in the book your details come from. This includes quotes, facts, or any borrowed material. 11. MLA or Chicago format are fine for this essay.

Paper For Above instruction

The modern American fascination with the Civil War remains one of the most vivid and enduring aspects of national identity, yet this obsession has overshadowed other significant chapters of American history such as the Mexican-American War, the War of 1812, and the American Revolution. Tony Horwitz’s book, “Confederates in the Attic,” illuminates why this focus persists and explores the cultural, historical, and emotional reasons behind it. This essay examines the reasons for the Civil War’s outsized prominence in American historical memory, compares gendered contributions to war remembrance, analyzes the symbolism of the Confederate battle flag, and discusses the ongoing nature of the Civil War as reflected in Horwitz’s narrative.

One prominent reason the Civil War dominates American memory is its profound impact on shaping the nation’s identity and defining its values. The war was a pivotal conflict that resolved fundamental issues about slavery, states’ rights, and national unity. Horwitz emphasizes that the Civil War became a cultural ritual, especially in the South, where memorials and reenactments serve as ongoing acts of remembrance. Unlike other conflicts, which may be commemorated periodically or in specific circles, the Civil War remains embedded in the everyday life and landscape of the South. This is partly because it symbolizes a larger struggle over race, history, and cultural identity, making it a living part of contemporary society (Horwitz, 1999).

Furthermore, the obsession with the Civil War is reinforced by collective memory and myth-making, which glorifies the valor of the Confederate soldiers and the lost cause narrative. Horwitz details how many Southerners cling to a romanticized view of rebel fighters, often seeing them as valiant and honorable despite the war’s brutality. This romanticism is reinforced by reenactors and museums that preserve a sanitized version of history, elevating the Confederacy to a symbol of regional pride rather than a slaveholding rebellion. These stories are passed down through generations, reinforcing a cultural attachment that resists acknowledgment of the war’s racial implications and its role in perpetuating slavery (Horwitz, 1999; Kingseed, 2004).

The gendered aspect of Civil War remembrance also reveals differences in how men and women approach this history. Women, such as Sue Curtis, June Wells, and Melly Meadows, often participate in ceremonies, memorials, and storytelling that emphasize moral virtue, sacrifice, and community. Their involvement reflects an effort to memorialize a shared heritage and foster a sense of continuity. Men, typically portrayed as active combatants or re-enactors, tend to focus on heroism and martial valor. The participation of women adds layers of emotional connection and moral dimension to the remembrance, complementing the often romanticized male narratives of bravery and honor. This gendered participation demonstrates that the memory of the Civil War serves not only as history but also as a means to reinforce societal values and gender roles (Horwitz, 1999).

The Confederate battle flag, a potent symbol of rebellion and regional identity, exemplifies the complex symbolism rooted in racial and cultural tensions. To many white Southerners, the flag symbolizes valor, sacrifice, and regional pride. However, for many African Americans, it signifies segregation, oppression, and white supremacy. Horwitz’s accounts, such as the incident involving Michael Westerman, illustrate how swayholding and flying the flag evoke intense emotional reactions and symbolize ongoing racial struggles. In some states like South Carolina and Mississippi, efforts to navigate the flag’s contested meaning have led to compromises, such as placing the flag on state grounds rather than as a central emblem. Nonetheless, the symbol remains divisive, revealing the persistent racial divides rooted in the Civil War’s history (Horwitz, 1999; Arnold & Wiener, 2011).

Horwitz underscores that the Civil War is an unfinished conflict, reflected in the ongoing debates over racial justice, memorialization, and regional identity. The narratives of resistance, remembrance, and revival continue to evoke emotions and political confrontations. The enduring nature of the conflict