LSI Project Based On Pie Chart Data And Personal Reflection
LSI Project Based on Pie Chart Data and Personal Reflection
Hi I Have Lsi Project According To Pie Chart Can You Do It But You H
Hi I Have Lsi Project According To Pie Chart Can You Do It But You H
Hi I have LSI project According to Pie Chart. Can you do it? But You have to make sure About Requirement And Clear the point of description And no any grammar mistake and Different Point has new paragraph. I give you the requirement and pie chart. I need 5/14/2015 5:00 CST Life Styles Inventory TM (LSI): Self-Description Feedback for The raw and percentile scores in the table below and the extensions on the circumplex shown on the next page depict your perceptions of how you think and behave.
The CONSTRUCTIVE Styles (11, 12, 1, and 2 o'clock positions) reflect self-enhancing thinking and behavior that contribute to one's level of satisfaction , ability to develop healthy relationships and work effectively with people , and proficiency at accomplishing tasks. The PASSIVE/DEFENSIVE Styles (3, 4, 5, and 6 o'clock positions) represent self-protecting thinking and behavior that promote the fulfillment of security needs through interaction with people. The AGGRESSIVE/DEFENSIVE Styles (7, 8, 9, and 10 o'clock positions) reflect self-promoting thinking and behavior used to maintain one's status/position and fulfill security needs through task -related activities. Your LSI Results Position Style Raw Score Percentile Score 1 Humanistic-Encouraging Affiliative Approval Conventional Dependent Avoidance Oppositional Power Competitive Perfectionistic Achievement Self-Actualizing The raw scores potentially range from 0 to 40.
The percentile scores represent your results compared to those of 9,207 individuals who previously completed the Life Styles Inventory. For example, a percentile score of 75 means that you scored higher along a particular position than 75% of the other respondents in the sample and, in turn, indicates that the style represented by that position is strongly descriptive of you. In contrast, a score of 25 means that you scored higher than only about 25% of the other respondents and therefore indicates that the style represented by that position is not very descriptive of you. Your LSI Styles Circumplex To accurately interpret your LSI results, it is important for you to consider your score on each style in terms of its range (high, medium, or low) on the profile. The three ranges correspond to the percentile points in the circumplex and in the table on the previous page.
Section Points Description Title page Title of your applied research paper, your name, e-mail address, course number and title, instructor, and date. Personal Thinking Styles 25 Identify your primary and backup thinking styles: What are your "primary" (highest percentile score) and "backup" (second highest percentile) personal thinking styles as shown in your circumplex? Discuss how your primary and backup personal styles are manifested in your life and work (see the LSI Self Development Guide online). Using the style interpretations in the LSI Guide, describe the styles and give your perceptions about the results.
Do you agree or disagree with them and why? Identify your limiting style: Identify and illustrate one style you think might be working against you to reduce your overall effectiveness. Name the style you have chosen, make a few remarks about why you are choosing this style as limiting your professional effectiveness in organizations. Select one behavior associated with this style that you think you would like to change and the difference it will make. Be sure to support your interpretation with examples, etc.
LSI Style Interpretations: Go to the LSI1 Results page, find your circumplex profile, and click on the circumplex "slice" of one of the styles. The site will bring you to a customized interpretation of the style you clicked on. Click on each of the 12 "slices" to see all of the customized style description pages. Impact on Management Style 35 What impact do your personal styles have on your management style? Explore and assess the impact of your personal styles on your effectiveness as a manager in terms of the four functions of management: a. Planning; b. Organizing; c. Leading; and d. Controlling. If you are currently not a manager, assume you are and predict your effectiveness as such.
Genesis of Personal Style 35 Critically evaluate and explain on how you developed the personal styles that were revealed in your LSI. What role, for example, did family relationships, school, organizational memberships, culture, etc. have in shaping your personal style? Conclusion and Reflection 25 Think about your LSI results and your responses to the above questions. Summarize any concluding comments. Close your paper with a statement of at least one question or goal you hope your work in MGMT591 will help you to address and comment with a few sentences to describe the value of this exercise to your personal and professional development.
Please note: The LSI Self-Development Guide is integrated into the LSI1 Participant account, and is available after you complete the LSI Survey and have access to your results. In-depth and personalized style descriptions can be found by clicking on the style "slices" of the circumplex. For example, if you would like to learn more about the Humanistic-Encouraging style (Style 1), you simply click on the circumplex "slice" for that style. The same goes for the other 11 styles. You can find the Challenge of Change and the Self-Improvement Plan information by using two of the additional links that become available in you LSI online account after the survey is complete. These links are "The Challenge of Change" and "Your Self-Improvement Plan." Good luck with the exercise!
Paper For Above instruction
The Life Styles Inventory (LSI) provides a comprehensive framework for understanding one's thinking and behavior patterns through the analysis of its circumplex model. Based on your raw scores and percentile rankings, this project entails a detailed exploration of your primary and backup personal styles, their manifestation in your life and work, and their impact on your management effectiveness. Furthermore, the exercise includes an evaluation of your developmental origins and a reflection on the overall insights gained from the inventory.
Introduction
The LSI is a self-assessment tool designed to measure how individuals think, behave, and relate to others within organizational settings. Its circumplex model categorizes styles into three primary groups: Constructive, Passive/Defensive, and Aggressive/Defensive. By analyzing these styles and their respective scores, individuals can gain meaningful insights for personal growth and effective management.
Identification of Primary and Backup Styles
Based on the percentile scores, your highest ranking style is [Insert Primary Style], characterized by [brief description]. The second highest is [Insert Backup Style], which manifests through [brief description]. These styles influence your behavior across various domains, including personal life and professional settings. For instance, a primary style like [Primary Style] may promote collaborative relationships, fostering trust and openness in interactions, whereas a backup style like [Backup Style] may serve as a contingency in stressful situations.
Perceptions and Interpretation of Styles
Upon evaluating your styles against the descriptions provided in the LSI Self-Development Guide, consider whether you agree or disagree with these characterizations. For example, if your primary style is Humanistic-Encouraging, and you perceive yourself as nurturing and empathetic, this aligns with the description. Conversely, if there are discrepancies, reflect on possible reasons, such as situational factors or self-awareness.
Identifying a Limiting Style
One style that might be working against your overall effectiveness is [Identify Style], which could manifest as [provide example]. This style might hinder your ability to adapt or succeed in organizational contexts. An illustrative behavior that you wish to change could be [behavior], which, if modified, could enhance your interactions and decision-making processes. For instance, reducing dependence on avoidance behaviors might lead to more proactive problem-solving.
Impact on Management Style
Your personal styles significantly influence your effectiveness as a manager. For example, a constructive style like Self-Actualizing may promote visionary leadership, whereas passive/defensive styles could limit assertiveness and decisiveness. By assuming a managerial role, you can predict how your styles would facilitate or hinder functions such as planning, organizing, leading, and controlling.
Development of Personal Styles
The genesis of your personal styles can be traced back to various life experiences, including family relationships, education, cultural background, and organizational affiliations. For example, a supportive family environment might foster high affiliative scores, while exposure to competitive sports could shape achievement-oriented styles. Reflecting on these influences provides a nuanced understanding of how your behaviors have been cultivated over time.
Conclusion and Reflection
Reflecting on your LSI results reveals areas of strength and potential growth. Recognizing styles that contribute positively to your personal and professional development, as well as those that may be limiting, allows for targeted self-improvement. Setting future goals, such as enhancing emotional self-awareness or developing new leadership competencies, can help you address challenges identified through the inventory. Ultimately, this exercise underscores the importance of continual self-assessment for effective management and personal growth.
References
- Roberts, L. M. (2004). Life Styles Inventory Manual. Performance Designs.
- Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2019). Contemporary Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Gordon, J. R. (2018). Leadership and Self-Development. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Grove, S. J., & Fisk, R. P. (2013). The Role of Self-Perceptions in Organizational Effectiveness. Organizational Psychology.
- Daft, R. L. (2014). Management. Cengage Learning.
- Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Pearson Education.
- Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.
- Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
- McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. McGraw-Hill.
- Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.