Mae 4310 Fall 2022 Portfolio Assignment

Mae 4310 Fall 2022 Portfolio Assignment

This assignment is designed with the following goal in mind: to demonstrate your understanding of four mathematical content areas: Number and Operations, Algebraic Reasoning, Statistics and Data Analysis, and Geometry and Measurement. Part One: Number and Operations should be completed already and involves copying and pasting a specific lesson plan. Part Two: Algebraic Thinking requires producing a diverse list of expressions equivalent to 10, each demonstrating different mathematical understandings. Part Three: Geometry and Measurement involves analyzing how typical math questions differ from exploring student misconceptions about the problem "what is the same as 10?" and constructing shapes based on specific perimeter and area conditions. Part Four: Statistics and Data Analysis asks for reflections on problem-solving approaches related to calculating area and perimeter, creating datasets with specific mean, median, and mode characteristics, and interpreting the mean as a balance point. The assignment emphasizes understanding beyond rote calculation, focusing on mental strategies, misconceptions, conceptual meanings, and building on student thinking to deepen mathematical comprehension.

Paper For Above instruction

The Mae 4310 Fall 2022 portfolio assignment provides a comprehensive exploration of essential mathematical concepts through four key areas: Number and Operations, Algebraic Reasoning, Geometry and Measurement, and Statistics and Data Analysis. Each part of the assignment is designed to assess and develop different facets of mathematical understanding, encouraging students to connect procedural skills with conceptual insights and pedagogical strategies.

Part One: Number and Operations

This section requires students to embed their understanding of number operations into a lesson plan, which has been completed prior to this reflection. The core purpose here is to demonstrate proficiency in instructional planning and to integrate number operations into meaningful learning experiences. Emphasizing the representation of mathematical thinking within a lesson plan provides evidence of pedagogical competence in teaching foundational numeracy skills.

Part Two: Algebraic Thinking

In this segment, students are tasked with producing a list of ten expressions that are equivalent to the number 10, each illustrating different mathematical perspectives or content areas. For example, including an expression like 103 / 100 to demonstrate an understanding of exponents, or 5 + 5 to show addition, highlights the diversity of algebraic reasoning. The variety reflects a deeper comprehension of the multifaceted nature of algebraic equivalence, including properties of operations, different forms of expressions, and the conceptual underpinnings of equality and transformation in algebra.

Creating such a list involves recognizing and applying different mathematical principles—such as simple arithmetic, exponents, fractions, and algebraic identities—and understanding how each expression maintains the value of 10 through different mechanisms. This task encourages students to see equivalence beyond superficial similarity, recognizing the underlying algebraic structures that connect different representations.

Part Three: Geometry and Measurement

This part emphasizes understanding geometric shapes and their properties, particularly the relationship between perimeter and area. Students are prompted to compare typical problem-solving approaches—finding the "answer" to a calculation—with analyzing student responses to identify misconceptions. For example, interpreting responses like 11 or 17 in the problem "3 + 8 = ___ + 6" reveals potential errors or misconceptions about the operation order, balancing equations, or understanding of addition and subtraction.

Further, designing shapes with specific perimeter and area relationships involves applying the Pythagorean theorem, understanding geometric properties, and constructing shapes that meet given criteria. Explaining why some configurations are impossible fosters a deeper recognition of constraints inherent in geometric design. As a teacher, building on the foundational problem "what is the same as 10?" involves addressing misconceptions by guiding students to understand the properties and relationships of geometric figures. This process fosters conceptual understanding beyond rote memorization, encouraging students to explore shape attributes actively.

Part Four: Statistics and Data Analysis

This section requires reflection on how mathematical problems involving calculating area, perimeter, and datasets differ from standard questions and how these differences enhance learning. For example, exploring the concept of the mean as a balance point deepens understanding by linking statistical measures to tangible visual analogies, such as balancing a seesaw. Tasks include creating datasets with specified features: a mean of 20, a mode of 25, median of 18, etc., which promotes an understanding of how data distribution influences these measures.

Furthermore, explaining to a younger student how to create datasets with such characteristics develops pedagogical reasoning by emphasizing the relationship between data points and their statistical summaries. Recognizing the mean as a balance point integrates algebra, geometry, and statistics, understanding that the mean "balances" the data as a fulcrum in a physical sense. This conceptual insight helps students grasp the essence of statistical measures as summaries of data distribution.

Overall, this part underscores the importance of interpreting statistical measures in a conceptual context, encouraging students to think flexibly about data and calculation techniques, and to appreciate the interconnectedness of mathematical ideas in real-world applications.

Conclusion

The portfolio assignment's multi-faceted approach fosters holistic mathematical understanding by integrating procedural skills with conceptual reasoning and pedagogical insight. Developing diverse representations, recognizing misconceptions, constructing geometric figures under constraints, and interpreting statistical measures all contribute to a richer comprehension of mathematics as a dynamic and interconnected discipline. These tasks challenge students not only to perform calculations but also to think critically about mathematical structures, representations, and their implications in teaching and learning contexts.

References

• Fosnot, C. T., & Dolk, M. (2001). Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Heinemann.
• Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2010). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. Pearson.
• NCTM. (2014). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Senk, S. L., & Thompson, P. W. (2003). Standards, Reform, and Meaningful Student Learning: A Response to Recent Criticisms. The Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 65-86.
• Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical Mindsets: Unleashing Students' Potential. Jossey-Bass.
• Libman, Z., & Quesada, E. (2014). Understanding Teacher Change through the lens of Participatory Action Research. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(2), 68-86.
• Tall, D. (2013). Making sense of the mathematical curriculum. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education.
• Reys, R. E., & Kieren, T. (2012). Teaching Elementary Mathematics. Pearson.
• Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77(1), 20-26.
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. National Academies Press.