Managerial Escalator Assignment No 1: A Checklist For You

Managerial Escalator Assignment No 1as A Checklist For Youi Am Look

Identify if interview questions will gather information on: (1) the interviewee’s route into management, (2) whether the interviewee is a Managerial Hybrid, (3) if there is a Managerial Gap due to the Manager not adjusting their time, and (4) the extent to which the organization's use of the four remedial strategies is evident.

Paper For Above instruction

The assessment focuses on analyzing the career trajectories of managers through the lens of the Managerial Escalator model, with an emphasis on constructing a comprehensive interview-based report. This report should critically examine how two managers' career paths conform or deviate from the typical escalation pattern, exploring the implications for their management style, organizational practices, and personal career development.

To accomplish this, students must first understand the core principles and representation of the Managerial Escalator. This involves a clear explanation of the model, which generally illustrates the progression of managerial responsibilities over time, typically involving stages such as supervisory roles, middle management, and senior leadership. Recognizing the variability in these stages' timing and nature is essential. Using diagrams, the student should visually depict the actual career growth paths of the interviewees to illustrate conformity or deviation from the model.

In selecting interviewees, students can choose managers from various contexts, including family members, acquaintances, or workplace contacts. Prior to the interviews, students must design a questionnaire grounded in the content of Rees & Porter's (2015) "Skills of Management and Leadership," emphasizing questions that reveal the individual's career progression, their perceptions of managerial responsibilities, and their understanding of the escalator concept. The questions should also probe whether they are hybrids—managers combining roles or responsibilities that diverge from traditional escalation.\p>

During interviews, students should gather detailed narratives about the interviewees' career decisions, overlaps, pauses, or accelerations in progression, and any organizational practices influencing their career development. After data collection, students analyze whether their interviewees' pathways align with the Escalator model. They should evaluate the timeframes involved, the nature of responsibilities, and any managerial gaps identified, particularly instances where managers have not adjusted their time or responsibilities as expected.

Furthermore, students are required to assess organizational remedial strategies used to address managerial gaps. These strategies include targeted training, mentoring programs, role adjustments, and succession planning. The report should critique the effectiveness and prevalence of these approaches based on interview insights and existing literature.

Reflecting on personal career implications, students should consider how the findings and the model influence their understanding of managerial development. They should discuss potential pathways, challenges, and organizational support mechanisms that might shape their future careers, aligning their reflections with the Illustrated Escalator and interview insights.

The report must be meticulously structured, including an introduction that outlines objectives and the scope; a literature review on the Managerial Escalator; methodology describing the interview process; findings with diagrams and analysis; critical discussion; personal reflection; and a concise conclusion with recommendations. Proper referencing following Harvard style, attention to academic tone, clarity, and grammatical accuracy are essential.

References

• Rees, G., & Porter, C. (2015). Skills of Management and Leadership. London: Routledge.
• Young, T. L. (2016). Successful project management. Kogan Page Publishers.
• Bens, I. (2017). Facilitating with Ease!: core skills for facilitators, team leaders, and members, managers, consultants, and trainers. Wiley.
• Hoda, R., & Murugesan, L. K. (2016). Multi-level agile project management challenges: A self-organizing team perspective. Journal of Systems and Software, 117, 123-132.
• Cottrell, S. (2013). The Study Skills Handbook. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Westminster Business School. (2019). Assessment guidelines and marking criteria.
• Johnson, G. (2018). Contemporary Management: An Introduction. Pearson.
• Smith, P. (2014). Organizational Development and Change. Routledge.
• Day, D.V., & Antonova, A. (2018). Leadership Development: Strategies for Success. Sage Publications.
• Mullins, L. J. (2016). Management and Organizational Behaviour. Pearson Education.