Managerial Economics Chapter 11: Foreign Exchange Trade And

Managerial Economicschapter 11 Foreign Exchange Tradeand Bubbles

Reflect on the assigned readings for the week. Identify what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding. Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions: 1. When Great Britain voted to leave the Euro- zone, the pound depreciated 17% against the dollar. It also raised fears that the Eurozone would fall apart. Explain how this fear would affect the euro/dollar exchange rate. [Your initial post should be based upon the assigned reading for the week, so the textbook should be a source listed in your reference section and cited within the body of the text. Other sources are not required but feel free to use them if they aid in your discussion]. [Your initial post should be at least 450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced). Post the actual body of your paper in the discussion thread then attach a Word version of the paper for APA review].

Paper For Above instruction

The assigned readings for this week offered valuable insights into the complex dynamics of foreign exchange markets, trade, and financial bubbles, with a particular focus on how perceptions of economic stability influence currency values. The most significant concept I derived relates to the interconnectedness of market sentiment and exchange rate fluctuations. Especially noteworthy is how geopolitical events, like the Brexit vote, can trigger rapid changes in currency valuations through investor fear and uncertainty. Understanding the mechanisms of supply and demand in the foreign exchange market, along with behavioral factors, enriches our grasp of how crises or uncertainties ripple through currency markets.

The specific event of Britain’s referendum to leave the Euro-zone exemplifies the influence of collective psychological responses on currency valuations. When Britain voted to exit, the pound depreciated sharply against the dollar, reflecting increased risk perceptions and uncertainty regarding the future stability of the Eurozone. The stemming fear was that the Eurozone’s cohesion might weaken or disintegrate, provoking investors to reassess their currency holdings and seek safer assets, generally the US dollar. This shift in sentiment heightened demand for the dollar, causing the dollar to appreciate relative to the euro, while the euro’s value declined. Theoretically, this situation induces a shift in the demand curve for euros — demand drops as investors foresee less stability or higher risk associated with holding euros — and possibly a shift in the supply curve depending on additional market reactions.

The fear of Eurozone collapse leads to a broader decline in confidence, which can be modeled as a leftward shift in the demand for euros or a rightward shift in supply, depending on underlying investor behaviors. If investors are withdrawing euros from the market, the demand curve shifts left, reducing the equilibrium exchange rate — meaning fewer euros per dollar — and lowering the euro's value. Conversely, if less foreign investment seeks to purchase euros, then supply increases and the euro depreciates. This interplay emphasizes that exchange rates are not solely driven by economic fundamentals but are heavily influenced by market perceptions and expectations. In the case of Britain’s vote, the immediate market reaction was driven by the collective fear of potential destabilization, which caused a spike in risk aversion. Investors moved their portfolios toward safer assets like US treasuries, further amplifying the dollar’s strength and the euro’s weakness.

The impact of such political uncertainty extends beyond immediate exchange rate adjustments, affecting broader financial markets and international trade dynamics. For example, a weaker euro makes European exports more competitive globally, potentially boosting exports but increasing import costs within Europe. These fluctuations directly influence multinational companies’ strategic decisions regarding hedging foreign currency risks and adjusting pricing strategies. Moreover, the increased volatility raises the cost of hedging and complicates long-term planning. Thus, market fears and perceptions of stability are central in determining exchange rate movements, which in turn influence international trade and capital flows.

From an academic perspective, this situation demonstrates the importance of understanding both macroeconomic fundamentals and behavioral finance in foreign exchange markets. Exchange rate modeling now incorporates expectations and sentiment analysis, recognizing that markets are not purely rational. The fast-changing reactions to Brexit exemplify how collective investor sentiment can override economic fundamentals temporarily, leading to sharp currency fluctuations. As investors monitor geopolitical developments, their collective fears or confidence levels rapidly alter the supply and demand balance, leading to fluctuating exchange rates.

In conclusion, the fear of Eurozone disintegration following Britain’s Brexit vote significantly influenced the euro/dollar exchange rate by affecting investor perceptions and triggering shifts in demand and supply dynamics. These market reactions underscore the importance of psychological and geopolitical considerations in currency valuation, emphasizing the need for policymakers and businesses to monitor political events closely. Recognizing how market sentiment interacts with economic fundamentals is vital for understanding the complexities of foreign exchange markets and safeguarding against unforeseen financial risks.

References

• Froeb, L., McCann, L., Shor, R., Ward, M., & Ward, M. (2018). Managerial Economics (5th ed.). Cengage.
• Le, H. P., Hui, L., & Thanh, S. (2018). How Leadership and Trust in Leaders Foster Employees’ Behavior toward Knowledge Sharing. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 46(5), 705–720.
• Chanh, S., Kwangseo, R. P., & Seung-wan, K. (2015). Servant Leadership and Team Performance: The Mediating Role of Knowledge-Sharing Climate. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 43(10), 1749–1760.
• Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (1998). The endogeneity of the exchange rate. Journal of International Economics, 44(1), 115–138.
• Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2004). What Drives Bank Competition? Some International Evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36(3), 558-583.
• Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2000). The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause? University of Chicago Press.
• Engel, C., & West, K. D. (2005). Exchange Rates and Fundamentals. Journal of Political Economy, 113(3), 485–517.
• Gopinath, G., & Ramey, V. A. (2004). Symposium on exchange rates. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 3-24.
• Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton University Press.
• Chan, S., & Leung, L. (2020). Political Uncertainty and Exchange Rate Volatility: Evidence from Britain’s Brexit Vote. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 69, 101242.