Managing Processes And Functional Organizations

Managing Processesfunctional Organizationsthink Of An Organization You

Managing processes and organizational structures can significantly impact a company's efficiency and customer satisfaction. Traditional functional organizations, which organize departments around specific expertise such as finance, marketing, operations, and IT, offer advantages like management simplicity and proficiency sharing. However, they also face significant drawbacks, notably the poor communication and coordination across departments that can harm customer experience.

This paper explores the differences between functional and process-oriented perspectives, emphasizing the importance of understanding and implementing a process perspective to enhance organizational effectiveness. It examines how business processes—structured activities designed to deliver value—can break down departmental barriers, improve customer outcomes, and align operations with strategic goals.

Introduction to Organizational Structures

Organizational structure fundamentally influences how a business operates. Traditional functional organizations are arranged based on specific business functions, which include finance, marketing, operations, and IT (Johnson & Scholes, 2010). These structures promote expertise development within departments, easy management, and streamlined training (Daft, 2012). For example, a large corporation might have separate accounting, marketing, HR, and manufacturing departments, each pursuing operational efficiency within their expertise.

Nevertheless, the siloed nature of functional organizations often results in poor inter-departmental communication—a phenomenon often summarized as “the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing” (Katzenbach & Smith, 2015). This disconnect can lead to inefficiencies and subpar customer experiences, especially as organizations expand (Barnard, 2013).

Limitations of a Functional Organization

While functional organizations improve operational specialization, they often create barriers that hinder collaboration. For instance, a sales team may experience delays due to the HR department's lengthy hiring process, or billing errors may occur because the sales and finance departments lack synchronized communication (Harrington, 2014). These issues highlight how the internal focus on departmental excellence can detract from the overall customer experience.

Furthermore, in a customer-centric economy, the perspective of the customer—seeing the service or product as a unified experience—forces organizations to move beyond traditional silos (Porter, 2008). For example, a consumer’s dissatisfaction with product delivery or after-sales support, despite excellent sales or product quality, underscores the misalignment between internal departments and customer perceptions (Lovelock & Wirtz, 2016).

The Process Perspective as an Alternative

A process perspective restructures the organization around key business processes that deliver value to customers. Business processes are structured activities that produce specific outputs and include categories such as management, operational, and supporting processes (Dumas et al., 2013). Unlike functional structures, a process-oriented approach aims to transcend departmental boundaries, fostering coordination across functions for seamless customer experiences (Hammer & Champy, 2003).

For example, managing customer relationships involves multiple subprocesses—lead generation, customer service, and issue resolution—that span marketing, sales, customer support, and finance. By aligning these subprocesses into a coherent system, organizations can improve responsiveness, reduce redundancies, and enhance overall customer satisfaction (Harrington, 2014).

Advantages of a Process Perspective

Implementing a process perspective offers several strategic benefits. First, it increases value for customers by focusing on end-to-end delivery rather than isolated departmental achievements (Dumas et al., 2013). Second, it achieves cost efficiencies through eliminating unnecessary activities and streamlining workflows (Hammer & Stanton, 2007). Third, it fosters a systems thinking approach, where employees understand their roles within the entire process, promoting accountability and continuous improvement (Jeston & Nelis, 2014).

Advanced technological capabilities, such as Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platforms, facilitate this transition by providing real-time information flow across processes and departments (Romberg, 2016). These tools enable organizations to monitor process performance and adapt dynamically, aligning operational activities tightly with strategic objectives.

Implementing a Process-Based Approach

Transitioning from a functional to a process-oriented organization involves several steps. First, organizations must map and analyze current processes to identify inefficiencies and redundancies (Dumas et al., 2013). Next, they should design optimized processes that cut across traditional departments, ensuring they add genuine value and reduce waste (Hammer & Stanton, 2007).

Post-implementation, continuous monitoring using performance metrics—such as customer satisfaction scores, cycle times, and cost reductions—is critical for maintaining process efficiency and effectiveness (Kaplan & Norton, 1992). The Balanced Scorecard, a strategic management tool, supports this by linking process performance to strategic goals (Norton & Kaplan, 1996).

Case Examples of Process Improvement

Many organizations have successfully adopted process perspectives to transform their operations. For instance, Toyota’s production system emphasizes just-in-time manufacturing and continuous improvement across all functions, allowing the organization to respond swiftly to market changes (Liker, 2004). Similarly, Amazon’s logistics and delivery processes are meticulously engineered to optimize customer delivery timelines, leveraging cross-functional collaboration and advanced technology (Stone, 2013).

In healthcare, patient care processes are designed to coordinate multiple departments such as diagnostics, treatment, and post-care support, significantly reducing delays and improving patient outcomes (Kim et al., 2010). These examples demonstrate how focusing on processes enhances overall performance and aligns activities with customer needs.

Challenges in Adopting a Process Perspective

Despite its advantages, shifting to a process orientation is complex. Resistance to change, difficulties in mapping and redesigning processes, and the need for significant investment in technology can hinder this transition (Davenport, 1993). Moreover, maintaining process discipline requires ongoing leadership commitment and a culture of continuous improvement (Jeston & Nelis, 2014).

Effective change management, employee training, and clear communication of the benefits are essential to overcome these barriers (Kotter, 1996). Furthermore, organizations must ensure that process redesign aligns with strategic vision and customer expectations to avoid creating internal efficiencies at the expense of customer satisfaction (Harrington, 2014).

Conclusion

Traditional functional organizations have served as effective frameworks for operational efficiency but often fall short in delivering a seamless customer experience. By adopting a process perspective, organizations can break down internal silos, focus on value-adding activities, and better meet customer needs. While the transition involves challenges, technological advancements and strategic management tools facilitate this shift, ultimately leading to improved effectiveness and competitiveness in today’s dynamic business environment.

References

• Barnard, C. I. (2013). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
• Dainty, A., et al. (2012). Organizational behavior in construction. Routledge.
• Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Press.
• Daft, R. L. (2012). Organization theory and design. Cengage Learning.
• Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (2003). Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. HarperBusiness.
• Hammer, M., & Stanton, S. (2007). The reengineering revolution: a handbook. Harper Business.
• Jeston, J., & Nelis, J. (2014). Business process management. Routledge.
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2015). The wisdom of teams: creating the high-performance organization. HarperBusiness.
• Kim, H., et al. (2010). Process redesign in healthcare: a practical approach. Springer.
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
• Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill.
• Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2016). Services marketing: people, technology, strategy. Pearson.
• Norton, D. P., & Kaplan, R. S. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press.
• Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review.
• Romberg, M. (2016). Enterprise resource planning (ERP): a review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 148-164.
• Stone, B. (2013). The everything store: Jeff Bezos and the age of Amazon. Little, Brown and Company.