Matrix Worksheet Template To Complete Part

Matrix Worksheet Templateuse This Document To Complete Part 2 Of The M

Use this document to complete Part 2 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry and Part 2: Research Methodologies. Include full citations of selected articles and provide explanations for why you chose each article and how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, considering ethical aspects of research. Briefly describe the aims of each research study, the research methodology used (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods), and discuss the strengths of each methodology, including reliability and validity considerations. Additionally, include notes or comments as relevant.

Paper For Above instruction

The clinical issue of workplace violence in nursing remains a significant concern impacting both patient care and nurse well-being. Numerous studies investigate the prevalence, causes, and potential interventions related to nurse-to-nurse incivility, hostility, and violence within healthcare settings. This paper examines four peer-reviewed articles relevant to understanding the research methodologies used to explore nursing workplace violence, evaluating their aims, methods, and strengths to inform evidence-based practice improvements.

Selected Articles and Rationale

The first article, by Crawford et al. (2019), offers an integrative review of nurse-to-nurse incivility, hostility, and violence, providing a comprehensive synthesis of existing research. I selected this article because it consolidates current knowledge on the topic, highlights gaps, and discusses implications for nursing leadership. Ethically, this research synthesizes existing studies without direct involvement with subjects, emphasizing the importance of accurate and unbiased data interpretation.

The second article, by Sauer (2017), discusses workplace violence as an occupational hazard in nursing, emphasizing that violence is often viewed as part of the job. This article was chosen due to its focus on nurses’ perspectives and experiences, providing valuable insights into ethical issues related to workplace safety and dignity. It also emphasizes the importance of safeguarding staff rights and ensuring ethical reporting and intervention protocols.

The third article, by Bambi et al. (2019), explores lateral violence and bullying among nurses, examining negative interactions within work environments. This study was selected for its focus on interpersonal dynamics affecting nurse safety and morale. Its ethical considerations include confidentiality and voluntary participation, with a focus on fostering a healthy work environment responsibly.

The fourth article, by Ramacciati et al. (2019), presents findings from a national survey on violence towards emergency nurses in Italy. The broad scope and large sample size provide a comprehensive understanding of violence in high-stress environments. Its ethical strengths include adherence to data protection standards and informed consent procedures.

Research Goals and Methodologies

Crawford et al. (2019) aimed to synthesize existing literature on nurse incivility and violence, employing an integrated review approach. Their methodology involved systematic literature searches, selection criteria, and thematic analysis, emphasizing reliability through rigorous screening protocols.

Sauer (2017) focused on conceptual analysis of workplace violence, utilizing qualitative content analysis of nurse testimonies and policy documents. The qualitative approach allowed for in-depth exploration of nurses’ personal experiences, supporting reliability through clear coding procedures.

Bambi et al. (2019) conducted an exploratory quantitative study using surveys to quantify the prevalence and characteristics of lateral violence among nurses. Their methodology, a cross-sectional design, provided reliable prevalence estimates and facilitated statistical analysis of associations.

Ramacciati et al. (2019) carried out a cross-sectional survey involving a large sample of Italian emergency nurses. Their quantitative methodology enabled analysis of violence frequency, types, and contributing factors, with high reliability due to standardized data collection instruments.

Strengths of Research Methodologies

The integrative review by Crawford et al. underscores the strength of comprehensive synthesis, which provides broad contextual understanding and identifies research gaps. Its systematic search strategy enhances validity and reliability by minimizing bias and ensuring thoroughness.

Sauer’s qualitative content analysis benefits from providing nuanced insights into nurses’ lived experiences, capturing complex emotional and contextual factors. Its validity depends on rigorous coding and triangulation, which can address subjective biases.

Bambi et al.’s quantitative survey offers reliable prevalence data, with statistical analysis supporting generalizability. Its strengths include the ability to measure associations and identify risk factors, although its cross-sectional nature limits causal inference.

Ramacciati et al.'s large-scale survey enhances the reliability of findings due to extensive sample size and standardized data collection. Its validity is supported by validated survey instruments and ethical adherence to participant rights.

Conclusion

The reviewed articles demonstrate diverse research methodologies applied to understanding violence in nursing settings. The qualitative approach captures personal experiences and contextual factors, while quantitative studies provide objective prevalence data and risk assessments. Together, these methodologies strengthen the evidence base, guiding effective interventions to mitigate workplace violence and enhance nurse safety and well-being. Future research should adopt mixed-methods approaches to integrate the depth of qualitative insights with the breadth of quantitative data, thereby informing comprehensive strategies for addressing violence in healthcare environments.

References

• Crawford, C. L., Chu, F., Judson, L. H., Cuenca, E., Jadalla, A. A., Tze-Polo, L., … Garvida Jr, R. (2019). An Integrative Review of Nurse-to-Nurse Incivility, Hostility, and Workplace Violence: A GPS for Nurse Leaders. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 138–156.
• Sauer, P. A. (2017). Workplace violence: Not part of the job. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 39(12), 1531–1532.
• Bambi, S., Guazzini, A., Piredda, M., Lucchini, A., De Marinis, M. G., & Rasero, L. (2019). Negative interactions among nurses: An explorative study on lateral violence and bullying in nursing work settings. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(4), 749–757.
• Ramacciati, N., Gili, A., Mezzetti, A., Ceccagnoli, A., Addey, B., & Rasero, L. (2019). Violence towards Emergency Nurses: The 2016 Italian National Survey—A cross-sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(4), 792–805.
• Additional references to support methodology analysis from recognized research methodology texts and recent systematic reviews in healthcare research.