Maureen Groome 2 Posts Module 3 DQ 1 How Does The Role Of Yo

Maureen Groome2 Postsremodule 3 Dq 1how Does The Role Of Your Chair D

Describe the differences between the role of your chair and the role of instructors in previous classes you have taken. Include specific responsibilities of your chair, such as communication, grading, feedback, setting up the Learning Development Plan (LDP), attending meetings, completing forms, and coordinating the defense calls. Explain how your role differs from previous experiences, including the use of different communication methods, creating and editing goals, and following instructions for assignments. Discuss whether these roles were expected and any uncertainties, such as submission procedures. Reflect on the importance of establishing a positive working relationship with your chair and committee members for personal and professional growth, emphasizing communication and trust. Finally, consider how differences of opinion within your committee can be leveraged to enhance creativity, and explain your approach to managing frustrations and collaboration with committee members.

Paper For Above instruction

The role of my chair in my current academic journey significantly differs from the roles of instructors in my previous educational experiences. In prior classes, instructors predominantly functioned as evaluators and providers of feedback, with limited direct interaction beyond assignments and assessments. My current chair, however, plays an active and multifaceted role that encompasses mentorship, administrative coordination, and ongoing communication. Early in the process, I was able to establish direct contact with my chair through phone conversations, which enhanced the personalized guidance I received. This ongoing accessibility is crucial for navigating complex tasks such as thesis development and defense planning.

One of the key responsibilities of my chair involves overseeing the setup and management of the Learning Development Plan (LDP), which is integral to tracking my progress and aligning my goals with program expectations. The chair attends regular meetings, completes necessary documentation, and ensures that the administrative aspects of my doctoral journey are handled efficiently. Through these duties, my chair acts as both a facilitator and an advocate, making sure that I am well-supported through every phase of the process.

In contrast, my role as a student is primarily focused on proactive engagement and self-management. I am required to communicate through various methods beyond electronic forums, such as phone calls and possibly face-to-face meetings when feasible. Additionally, I am responsible for creating, revising, and adhering to my personal success plan, which involves setting milestones and timelines based on the guidance provided by the program’s framework. This proactive approach to goal-setting and self-assessment fosters a sense of ownership over my academic progress.

In terms of expectations, I anticipated a collaborative relationship centered around clear communication and professional accountability, which aligns with my experiences so far. However, I am still uncertain about specific procedural details, such as whether I should submit papers directly to the LDP or through the Learning Committee (LC), and at what stages these submissions occur. These ambiguities highlight the need for ongoing clarification and open dialogue with my chair and committee members.

Developing a positive and professional working relationship with my chair and committee members is vital both personally and professionally. A strong rapport, built on trust and open channels of communication, ensures that I can seek guidance, address challenges, and receive constructive feedback effectively. Recognizing that differing opinions or conflicts are natural in the dissertation process, I view these disagreements as opportunities for growth. Constructive debates can stimulate creativity and lead to innovative solutions, provided that they are managed respectfully and thoughtfully.

To leverage differences of opinion constructively, I plan to adopt a mindset of active listening and openness to diverse perspectives. When frustrations arise, I aim to communicate my concerns clearly and seek collaborative solutions, understanding that the collective wisdom of experienced committee members can enhance the quality and originality of my work. I am excited about working with my committee members because their guidance and insights are invaluable, and I trust that building strong professional bonds will facilitate a smoother academic journey.

In conclusion, the evolving role of my chair as a mentor and coordinator contrasts with the more passive role of instructors I encountered previously. My responsibility as a student involves proactive planning, communication, and openness to feedback. Recognizing the importance of cultivating positive relationships within my academic committee will help me navigate challenges, foster creativity through diverse viewpoints, and ultimately achieve success in my doctoral pursuits.

References

• GCUa. (2014). Chair role and responsibilities at a glance. Retrieved from: [URL]
• GCUb. (2014). Learner role and responsibilities at a glance. Retrieved from: [URL]
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. SAGE Publications.
• Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). The Work of Breaking Down Barriers to Interprofessional Collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24(5), 541-550.
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Pearson.
• Tinto, V. (2012). Completing College: Rethinking Institutional Action. University of Chicago Press.
• Maxwell, J. C. (2012). The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership. Thomas Nelson.
• Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2018). The Element: How Finding Your Passion Changes Everything. Penguin Books.
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. ASCD.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.