Media Violence Martina Briceno Florida International Univers

media Violence Martina Bricenoflorida International Universityprof Am

For this assignment, you are required to conduct a compare-and-contrast case study on media violence, using the same event/topic from Capstone Part #1. You should analyze the portrayal of this event from three different perspectives: locally, nationally, and globally. Your analysis must explore differences and similarities in media coverage, audience reactions, and any movements or public responses that occurred in different regions. Specifically, assess whether there were variations in media depiction across different countries, if the responses from media consumers differed, and if different movements or societal reactions emerged based on perceptions of media violence associated with the event. The case study should be written in APA style, approximately 800 words, and include a cover page, proper in-text citations, and a reference page. Use credible sources to support your analysis, and ensure the content is in third person, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12pt font. The paper must be submitted as a Word document, following the detailed formatting and structural guidelines, and must meet the academic integrity standards with a similarity index below 25%. The work should demonstrate proper academic writing skills developed through ENC 1101 and ENC 1102, that is, clear paragraph structure, punctuation, grammar, and logical flow.

Paper For Above instruction

The phenomenon of media violence has been a central topic in discussions concerning its influence on individual behavior and societal development. The portrayal of violent events across various media outlets often varies based on geographic and cultural contexts, leading to diverse public perceptions and responses. This case study examines how media coverage of a specific violent event differed at the local, national, and global levels, highlighting the contrasts and similarities in portrayal, audience reactions, and societal movements triggered by media reports.

Local Perspective

The local media coverage of the event typically provides detailed and immediate reports tailored to the community affected. For instance, in the case of the Columbine shooting in 1999, local news outlets in Columbine, Colorado, focused heavily on the impact on residents, the community's grief, and the law enforcement response. The local media often emphasized narratives of tragedy and resilience, sometimes highlighting the local institutions’ responses, such as schools and community organizations mobilizing to support victims. Media coverage was characterized by visceral descriptions and emotional appeals aimed at fostering a sense of communal solidarity. These reports often included interviews with local officials and residents, painting a picture of a community in crisis but determined to recover.

National Perspective

On a national scale, media coverage of the event tends to evolve to include broader discussions about legal, social, and policy implications. In the United States, national media outlets like CNN, NBC, and The New York Times provided extensive coverage, placing the local tragedy within a wider context of school violence and gun control debates. These outlets analyzed the event's implications for national policy, often framing the shooting as part of a pattern of increasing youth violence. The focus shifted from immediate emotional response to discussions about media influence, gun laws, and mental health issues. Reactions from the American public varied; some called for stricter gun legislation, while others defended individual rights. The national portrayal often included expert commentary, statistical analyses, and policy debates, contrasting sharply with the more emotionally driven local reports.

Global Perspective

International coverage of the event provided yet another perspective, often emphasizing issues of global relevance or cultural differences. Media outlets in countries such as the UK, Canada, and Spain often presented the shooting within a larger discourse on gun culture and violence. For instance, UK media typically compared American gun laws and violence rates with their own, highlighting perceived differences in cultural norms. These reports sometimes sparked debates about the influence of media violence and the cultural factors underlying violent acts. Public reactions outside of the United States were generally less emotionally involved but expressed concern over the prevalence of gun violence in American society. Movements or protests related to media violence and gun control were less prominent internationally but gained some traction in academic and policy circles. The portrayal by global media was usually more analytical and comparative, focusing on policy implications and cultural differences rather than emotional narratives observed locally.

Comparison and Contrast

The differences in coverage across these levels reveal how media framing influences public perception. Locally, the focus is on immediate emotional impact and community resilience, fostering a sense of empathy and collective support. Nationally, coverage tends to incorporate debates around policies, societal responsibility, and media influence—shifting the narrative from individual tragedy to systemic issues. Globally, the portrayal is often detached but analytical, providing cultural context and comparative analysis to highlight differences in societal norms and legislative frameworks.

Reactions from media consumers also vary across these levels. Locally, residents often display intense emotional responses, grief, and solidarity. National reactions include polarized debates on gun laws and mental health, with some segments demanding policy change, while others emphasize individual rights. International audiences tend to reflect curiosity or concern, often framing the event within broader issues of violence and media influence, but with less emotional involvement. Movements such as increased advocacy for gun control or mental health awareness emerged more prominently in the United States, driven by local and national media’s emphasis. Globally, awareness campaigns and academic discussions on media violence and cultural differences increased, although the grassroots activism was less visible.

Conclusion

The portrayal of violent events through media varies significantly across different geographic levels, shaped by local contexts, national policies, and cultural values. Understanding these differences provides insight into how media influences perception and action, emphasizing the importance of responsible reporting and critical media literacy. Recognizing the nuanced ways media constructs events allows for a more balanced view of violence and its societal implications, fostering informed and constructive public discourse.

References

• Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2018). Media violence and the general aggression model. Journal of Social Issues, 74(2), 386-403.
• Gentile, D. A., Coyne, S., & Walsh, D. A. (2011). Media violence, physical aggression, and relational aggression in school-age children: A short-term longitudinal study. Aggressive Behavior, 37(2), 193–206.
• Linz, D. (2003). Violence and Media Effects. Journal of Media Psychology, 15(4), 221-233.
• Olson, C. K. (2004). Media violence research and youth violence data: Why do they conflict? Academic Psychiatry, 28(2), 122-130.
• Petersen, J., & Densley, J. (2017). Cyber violence: What do we know and where do we go from here? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 1-8.
• Phillips, N. D. (2017). Violence, media effects, and criminology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice.
• Tumbokon, R. (2022). 25+ Positive & negative effects of video games, according to studies. Raise Smart Kid.
• Wartella, E., & Reeves, B. (2020). Media and Violence: A Contemporary Concern. Journal of Communication, 70(2), 244-261.
• Huesmann, L. R., Moise-Titus, J., Podolski, C. L., & Eron, L. D. (2003). Longitudinal relations between children’s exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood: 10-year follow-up. Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 201-221.
• Strasburger, V. C., Jordan, A. B., & Donnerstein, E. (2010). Health effects of media on children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 125(4), 756-767.