Maintain Political, Governmental Staff And Patient Lo 334190

To Maintain Political Governmental Staff And Patient Loyalty The H

To maintain political, governmental, staff, and patient loyalty, the healthcare organization must provide a sense of organizational stability and view of the legislative landscape. In Chapters 14 and 15 we have researched and investigated the need to align both public opinion with staff trust. The political landscape is the basis for healthcare policy, guidance, state, local, and community support (both fiscal and legal) engaging in political trade-offs to stabilize the healthcare industry (such as in the cost, pharmaceuticals, insurance premiums, and organizational ROI in the healthcare industry). Healthcare organizations must provide the necessary guidance and advocacy for stakeholders in the setting of both state and federal legislature as a voice of reason, authority, and integrity.

Paper For Above instruction

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), enacted in 2010, has significantly reshaped the landscape of healthcare policy and reform across the United States, including California. One notable policy under the ACA that affected healthcare delivery in California is the Medicaid expansion, which aimed to increase health coverage among low-income populations. The policy was promoted by the federal government under the Obama administration, with legislative support from Congress, notably the Affordable Care Act itself. In California, the expansion was implemented through the California Medicaid program, known as Medi-Cal, increasing eligibility for Medicaid services to individuals earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level.

Statistically, the Medicaid expansion in California resulted in coverage for approximately 4 million uninsured residents (California Department of Health Care Services, 2020). This expansion was driven by political support from Governor Jerry Brown and the California Legislature, which recognized the need to reduce healthcare disparities and improve health outcomes among vulnerable populations. The policy was promoted through extensive advocacy campaigns, highlighting the cost savings and health benefits of expanded coverage, including reductions in uncompensated care costs for hospitals and clinics.

The trade-offs associated with Medicaid expansion involve balancing stakeholder interests. On one side, increased coverage provides tangible health benefits to disadvantaged populations and reduces the financial strain of uncompensated care on healthcare providers. Conversely, there are concerns related to the increased state expenditure, as California's share of Medicaid expansion costs is substantial, with estimates of several billion dollars annually (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2021). Moreover, critics argue that expansion might lead to increased demand for services, potentially straining existing healthcare infrastructure.

Public perception plays a crucial role in healthcare policy valuation, particularly in how voters and stakeholders perceive the legitimacy and effectiveness of reforms. Initially, opposition from some political groups and healthcare providers raised questions about the sustainability of Medicaid expansion, especially regarding funding and resource allocation. However, over time, public support increased as the visible health improvements and economic benefits, such as reduced emergency room visits and hospital readmissions, became evident (Huh et al., 2021). Disinterestedness, or the detached evaluation of policy outcomes by stakeholders, contributes to shaping ongoing healthcare reforms by emphasizing data-driven assessments and transparency.

In fostering stakeholder balance, process innovation, risk-taking, health policy analysis, and governance "sense-making" are vital. Process innovations, like the integration of electronic health records and telehealth services, have improved efficiency and accessibility for underserved populations. Risk-taking involves healthcare providers and policymakers experimenting with novel payment models, such as value-based care, which incentivizes quality over quantity (Porter & Lee, 2013). Rigorous health policy analysis ensures empirical evaluation of reform impacts, guiding adaptive strategies to mitigate unintended consequences. Governance "sense-making" refers to the collective understanding and interpretation of complex policy environments, fostering consensus among stakeholders and maintaining transparency.

Ultimately, balancing healthcare stakeholders amid complex policy reforms depends upon continuous innovation, informed risk engagement, transparent analysis, and adaptive governance. These elements foster trust, stability, and the capacity to respond to evolving healthcare needs—crucial for maintaining loyalty from patients, staff, and political entities alike.

References

• California Department of Health Care Services. (2020). Medi-Cal enrollment summary. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/dataandstatistics/Pages/Medi-Cal-Enrollment.aspx
• Huh, J., Yoon, E., & Jo, S. (2021). Public opinion and health policy reforms: The case of Medicaid expansion. Journal of Health Policy, 35(4), 567-584.
• Kaiser Family Foundation. (2021). Medicaid expansion state fiscal impact. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/state-indicator/state-fiscal-impact
• Porter, M. E., & Lee, T. H. (2013). The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard Business Review, 91(10), 113-120.