MGT425 Critical Thinking Rubric Module 3 Criteria Meets Expe
Mgt425critical Thinking Rubric Module 3criteria Meets Expectation Ap
MGT425 Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 3 Criteria Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence Content, Research, and Analysis 25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points Requirements Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points Content Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources regarding implementation of leadership theories, building effective teams, and addressing challenges associated with team cohesion.
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge regarding implementation of leadership theories, building effective teams, and addressing challenges associated with team cohesion. Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge regarding implementation of leadership theories, building effective teams, and addressing challenges associated with team cohesion. Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials regarding implementation of leadership theories, building effective teams, and addressing challenges associated with team cohesion. 25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points Analysis Provides strong or adequate thought, insight and analysis of concepts and applications of leadership theories and teamwork.
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis of concepts and applications of leadership theories and teamwork. Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis of concepts and applications of leadership theories and teamwork. Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis of concepts and applications of leadership theories and teamwork. Mechanics and Writing 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment.
Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Demonstrates proper use of APA style Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU- Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error. Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors. Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors. Total points possible = 130 John Pavosevic - classmate Hi Everyone, I have completed my personality assessment and I was surprised by the results of the assessment. While I was counting my points for each personality I noticed a slight pattern forming. Score for I (Introversion) = 3 Score for E (Extraversion) = 5 Score for S (Sensing) = 5 Score for N (Intuition) = 3 Score for T (Thinking) = 5 Score for F (Feeling) = 3 Score for J (Judging) = 5 Score for P (Perceiving) = 3 The final result show that my dominating personality type is ESTJ and my non-dominate type is INFP.
The reason I mentioned the non-dominate type is because after reading both types I now see how and I switch between the two types. When I and working on task the ESTJ type takes control of how I work and interact with others in my group. When I am not working on an important task the INFP type takes tasks that are a part of my daily responsibilities. ESTJ – Personality type is practical, realistic, and matter-of-fact. Decisive, quickly move to implement decisions.
Organize projects and people to get things done, focus on getting results in the most efficient way possible. Take care of routine details. Have a clear set of logical standards, systematically follow them and want others to also. Forceful in implementing their plans. John Emmett Newton - classmate Hello, Looks like we have at least two 'ESTJ's' in the group.
Like John, I also landed on the ESTJ square. My Introversion vs. Extroversion was a tie, but the tiebreaker put me in the 'Extrovert' column. The other three sections were all six-point winners for Sensing, Thinking, and Judging. Sat Mar 21, 2015 at 3:30 pm · Like · Reply Shannon Pieczynski - mine Hey there, After completing the personality assessment, I was surprised to see how one sided my results were.
Score for I (Introversion) = 4 Score for E (Extraversion) = 3 Score for Sensing = 7 Score for N (Intuition) =1 Score for T (Thinking) = 2 Score for F (Feeling) = 6 Score for J (Judging) = 8 Score for P (Perceiving) = 0 After adding up my score the test determined that my dominating personality type is ISFJ. After reading the description, I must say it fits me pretty well. I tend to often be a quiet person but am committed to getting whatever project I am working on completed in a timely manner. I like things done a certain way and tend to be a “creature of habitâ€. Like John, I also looked at the description for my non-dominate type which is ENTP.
After looking at both traits I can easily see that I am definitely more of an ISFJ type than an ENTp. ISFJ – Quiet, friendly, responsible, and conscientious. Committed and steady in meeting their obligations. Thorough, painstaking, and accurate. Loyal, considerate, notice and remember specifics about people who are important to them, concerned with how others feel. Strive to create an orderly and harmonious environment at work and at home.