MGTU 301 SA Paper Draft Outline Length: 2-3 Double-Spaced Pa
MGTU 301 SA Paper Draft Outline Length: 2-3 double-spaced pages
Prepare and submit 2-3 page outline draft of your final SA assignment, ‘My Utopia Job’. A well-constructed paper will reference 3 or more scholarly sources including at least 1 journal article and adhere to APA standards. Your outline should include:
- Introduction: purpose statement, a brief overview of 4-5 main points of analysis (including 2 strengths, 2-3 new management tools, and 2-3 ideal jobs).
- Analysis (Body): List 4-5 main points with brief explanations, each supported by proper citations (including page numbers and short quotes).
- Conclusion: one or two sentences summarizing your analysis, tying back to the introduction.
Ensure correct spelling, grammar, and APA formatting. Bring a draft to the Week 5 class session for review.
Paper For Above instruction
The final assignment for the MGTU 301 course involves creating a comprehensive outline for a paper titled ‘My Utopia Job’. This outline serves as a preliminary version of the final paper, aiming to clarify the main points of analysis and ensure a structured approach to discussing personal management strengths and relevant tools. The purpose of this exercise is to facilitate feedback and guide the development of a well-argued, scholarly final submission.
The core of the outline comprises an introduction, body, and conclusion. In the introduction, students will present a clear purpose statement that specifies what the paper aims to explore. This section will also include a brief overview of four to five main points, notably two management strengths, three management tools, and two or three ideal jobs that align with personal aptitudes and interests. These points form the foundation of the analytical body of the paper.
The body section elaborates on each main point, providing a brief explanation and supporting citations from scholarly sources. Students should include at least one journal article from the virtual library, citing pages and direct quotes to substantiate their analysis. The analysis should consistently connect the management tools and strengths to potential career paths or roles, demonstrating self-awareness and strategic thinking.
The conclusion consolidates the discussion with one or two summary sentences. It should revisit the main insights without introducing new ideas, synthesizing the analysis and emphasizing the relevance of these management competencies to future career aspirations.
Adherence to academic standards is crucial. The outline must be 2-3 pages, double-spaced, with proper APA formatting for citations and references. The assignment emphasizes clarity, coherence, and scholarly rigor, ensuring the points are well-articulated and supported. This outline will guide the final paper, which reflects self-understanding and strategic management planning based on coursework feedback and self-assessment.
References
- Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2018). Management (14th ed.). Pearson.
- Baron, R. A., & Tang, Y. (2011). The role of entrepreneurs’ emotional intelligence in their success. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 531-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.07.003
- Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 36(2), 143-160.
- Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
- Cameron, K. S., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2012). Chapter 11: The mindful organization. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Positive Organization (pp. 224-259).
- Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 59(4), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.4.309
- Grant, A. M. (2013). Give and take: A revolutionary approach to success. Penguin.
- Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
- McShane, S. L., & Glinow, M. A. (2018). Organizational behavior: Emerging knowledge and practice for the real world. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap... and others don't. HarperBusiness.