Mild To Moderate Disability: 6 Characteristics Of A Mild To

MILD TO MODERATE DISABILITY 6 Characteristics of a Mild to Moderate Disability; Henry’s Case

Cognitive impairments are categorized into various classes comprising of mild, moderate, severe, and profound intellectual disability. The first two classes affect learning to a slight extent where the parties involved in managing them can control easily. Study shows that around 85% of people facing intellectual disabilities fall into the category of mild intellectual one and this class does not have much impact on the academic success. For instance, someone who can read but find it challenging to comprehend what they read fall into this category.

On the other hand, students with moderate intellectual disability communicate fairly even though their communication is only applicable on simple contexts. Hence, people under this category usually have difficulty in social situations and face challenges in social judgments. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of mild to moderate intellectual disability based on Henry’s case. The definition and characteristics of mild to moderate disability as outline by individuals with disabilities act. According to Basha (2014), mild to moderate disability refers to disability which affects students having difficulty in some precise disabilities such as struggling to read or having problems in comprehending math skills. Also, this category of disability affects speech and students falling under this category requires speech therapy as a remedy.

Students in this category normally work well within a general classroom setting where there is an accommodation or when a teacher is present. However, some students falling under this level have disability even though the Individuals with Disability Act defines that the affected student’s disabilities ought to be mild. For instance, a student having hearing problem can be assisted with the aid of hearing devices and can be taught with others without any hearing problems, even though accommodation ought to be included for them to effectively learn with others (Basha, 2014).

Henry does not have any physical disability even though he is classed under mild to moderate category due to his mild disability to read and comprehend vocabularies. Hence, like students with disabilities, various approaches can be used to assist him and enable him to cope with his colleagues in class. Assessing a child’s level of functioning in various contexts is a critical step to measure their capability to cope with those contexts and whether there is a need to assist them to avoid being isolated and experiencing difficulty in learning (Basha, 2014). Henry’s case was chosen based on various reasons which justified the assessor’s decision to categorize him under mild to moderate intellectual disability.

Paper For Above instruction

Henry’s case exemplifies a classic instance of mild to moderate intellectual disability characterized predominantly by challenges in reading and comprehension. The categorization stems from a comprehensive evaluation of his academic performance, social interactions, and self-perception. The decision to classify him within this subgroup was motivated by observed difficulties in decoding words, reticence in verbal expression, and a tendency to seek peer avoidance, all consistent with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities documented in educational psychology literature.

The primary factors underpinning Henry’s disabilities can be broadly classified into environmental, instructional, and psychological causes. Environmental factors, such as limited access to appropriate reading materials, significantly impact his motivation to engage with reading tasks. The lack of accessible books that suited his preferences was a barrier preventing Henry from cultivating a sustained interest in reading, thereby reinforcing his difficulties. Additionally, his prior learning environment did little to involve him actively in classroom activities, such as seating arrangements that possibly hindered his participation and assimilation, further exacerbating his social and academic struggles.

Instructionally, Henry experienced minimal engagement and targeted support aimed specifically at his identified difficulties. His tendency to sit at the back of the classroom and avoid peer interaction indicates insufficient instructional accommodations and supportive interventions. These instructional deficits lead to a lack of immediate corrective feedback and reinforcement essential for children with mild disabilities who often require early and tailored strategies to improve literacy and social skills. Such instructional neglect potentially repels him further from active participation, reinforcing his self-perception of inadequacy regarding reading and comprehension tasks.

Psychological factors also play a critical role. Henry’s own beliefs about his reading ability—affirmed by his statements of being "not good at it"—suggest a self-efficacy issue that may hinder his motivation to improve. His persistence and willingness to attempt assessments despite difficulties reflect a resilient attitude, but psychological barriers like low confidence and fear of failure could diminish the effectiveness of future interventions unless addressed comprehensively.

The potential impact of unaddressed mild to moderate disabilities like Henry’s is profound. Early identification and intervention are crucial in preventing the escalation of learning difficulties into more profound disabilities. Without appropriate support, Henry might develop negative self-concept, social withdrawal, and academic failure, which could impair his future educational and social prospects. Long-term consequences include increased likelihood of dropping out of school, social isolation, and diminished employment opportunities. Conversely, early and targeted strategies—such as differentiated instruction, speech and language therapy, and social skills training—could significantly enhance Henry’s developmental trajectory and academic success.

Addressing Henry’s challenges requires a multi-faceted approach. First, personalized educational plans that incorporate speech therapy and reading interventions tailored to his specific needs are fundamental. Incorporating assistive technologies and accessible reading materials aligned with his interests can foster engagement and motivation. Second, environmental modifications, such as the strategic seating arrangement and increased classroom interaction, can promote active participation and peer engagement. Instructionally, active involvement through scaffolding and explicit teaching of reading strategies can reinforce skills and boost confidence. Lastly, psychological support aimed at enhancing self-efficacy, resilience, and motivation is essential to overcoming internal barriers to learning.

Furthermore, collaboration among educators, speech-language pathologists, psychologists, and family members plays an influential role in creating a supportive ecosystem that allows Henry to thrive. Regular assessment and data collection are necessary to monitor his progress and adapt interventions accordingly. Creating a positive, inclusive classroom climate that celebrates small successes will help foster a growth mindset, encouraging Henry and similar students to overcome learning hurdles.

References

• Basha, S. (2014). Special and inclusive education specialization in mild and moderate disabilities. EDUCatt - Ente per il diritto allo studio universitario dell'Università Cattolica.
• Gargiulo, R. M., & Bouck, E. C. (2017). Instructional Strategies for Students With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Intellectual Disability. Sage Publications.
• Whitaker, S. (2013). Causes of Intellectual Disability. In Intellectual Disability. Retrieved from https://example.com/causes-of-intellectual-disability
• Copeland, S. R., & Masi, R. J. (2002). Learning Disabilities and Mild Intellectual Disabilities: An Overview. Journal of School Psychology, 40(4), 407-423.
• Reid, R., & Lienemann, T. O. (2013). Strategy Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities. Guilford Publications.
• Fletcher, J. M., & Francis, D. J. (2018). Early Identification and Support for Students with Reading Difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1023-1034.
• Bailey, D., & Moore, E. (2020). Educational Interventions for Mild Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 103058.
• U.S. Department of Education. (2017). A Guide to the Individualized Education Program. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
• Baum, S., & McLaren, S. (2019). Differentiated Instruction in Inclusive Classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 52(2), 102-110.
• Hodkinson, A., & Vick, M. (2014). Inclusion Strategies in a Mainstream Classroom. Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(6), 580-595.