Milestone 3 Sandy Pennington Southern New Hampshire

MILESTONE 3 5 Milestone 3 Sandy Pennington Southern New Hampshire University

Social and cultural evaluation and assessment are crucial components in understanding the scope and variables affecting psychological research, especially when implementing projects within societies. Most psychological studies focus on group-based assessments rather than individual cases, considering the influence of social factors such as culture, economic background, family lineage, social structures, and gender roles. These components significantly impact human psychological development and behavior (Vohs & Baumeister, 2016).

Focusing on the theme of self-esteem, it is evident that this psychological construct is heavily influenced by social interactions and cultural contexts. Self-esteem develops through social experiences, interactions, and the perception of oneself in relation to others. During adolescence, a critical period of human development, self-esteem tends to fluctuate due to increased social comparison, peer influence, and societal standards. This stage is marked by heightened self-awareness and an ongoing process of evaluating one's worth based on feedback from social environments (Bleidorn et al., 2016).

The social and cultural environment shapes self-esteem in multiple ways. Cultural beliefs, namely value systems and norms, influence what is considered desirable or undesirable, impacting self-perceptions among adolescents. For example, societal standards of physical appearance often dictate ideals of beauty, which heavily influence adolescents' self-esteem regarding their body image. Cultural attitudes toward gender roles and social hierarchies further affect self-worth, motivation, and peer relations, especially during adolescence when identity formation is prominent (Bleidorn et al., 2016).

In my research project, which focuses on evaluating self-esteem among adolescents, understanding these cultural factors is fundamental. The study will examine teenagers at various stages of adolescence—those approaching, experiencing, or having recently passed through this developmental phase. The assessment will include variables such as cultural beliefs, societal standards, peer influence, and family expectations to understand how these social and cultural factors contribute to self-esteem development (Vohs & Baumeister, 2016).

Furthermore, social parameters such as socioeconomic status, religious background, and community influences play critical roles in shaping self-esteem during adolescence. For instance, economic status often correlates with access to resources, social opportunities, and exposure to societal standards, all of which affect self-perception. Teenagers from affluent backgrounds may experience different self-esteem trajectories than those from lower-income environments due to disparities in social comparison opportunities and societal expectations. Religious beliefs can also influence self-esteem by providing moral frameworks and community support that reinforce positive self-regard or, conversely, impose stigmatization.

Physical appearance, a significant component of societal standards, deeply affects adolescent self-esteem. Society’s definition of beauty often sets idealized standards that adolescents strive to meet, influencing their self-image and confidence. Media portrayals and cultural norms perpetuate specific aesthetic ideals that can lead to body dissatisfaction and decreased self-esteem among youth who feel they do not align with prevailing standards. These perceptions vary across cultures but universally exert substantial effects on adolescent self-esteem levels (Bleidorn et al., 2016).

Assessing these social and cultural factors provides critical insight into the processes underlying self-esteem development during adolescence. Recognizing the influence of societal norms, cultural values, and social structures allows for more targeted interventions and support mechanisms to promote healthy self-esteem. This holistic approach enables practitioners and researchers to design culturally sensitive programs that address both the typical and atypical facets of self-esteem development while considering physical, cognitive, and affective domains.

In addition to evaluation, intervention strategies should incorporate prevention programs aimed at fostering positive social interactions, challenging harmful societal standards, and promoting resilience. These interventions might include peer support groups, media literacy education, family counseling, and community engagement initiatives designed to strengthen adolescents’ self-worth and adaptive skills. Evaluating the effectiveness of such programs requires a comprehensive assessment that accounts for cultural nuances, social influences, and individual differences.

In conclusion, understanding the social and cultural dimensions influencing self-esteem is fundamental to psychological research and practical application. By thoroughly assessing these factors, researchers and practitioners can develop more effective, culturally sensitive interventions that enhance adolescents' self-esteem and overall psychological well-being. The interconnectedness of social and cultural influences emphasizes the necessity for a multidimensional approach to evaluating and supporting adolescent development.

References

• Bleidorn, W., Arslan, R. C., Denissen, J. J., Rentfrow, P. J., Gebauer, J. E., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). Age and gender differences in self-esteem—A cross-cultural window. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(3), 396-410.
• Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Publications.
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
• Harter, S. (1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. Guilford Publications.
• Ryan, A. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
• Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5-37.
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
• Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Schools as developmental sites for youth: A view from developmental psychology. Handbook of adolescent psychology.
• Schönpflug, U., & Schiefele, U. (1999). The development of children's self-concept: The role of social comparison. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 173–192.
• Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and psychosocial development in adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 43(3), 163–175.