Minimum Of 150 Words For Each Question And References

A Minimum Of 150 Words Each Question And References Questions 1 6

A Minimum Of 150 Words Each Question And References Questions 1 6

Questions 1 to 6 require comprehensive responses, each a minimum of 150 words, accompanied by scholarly references. Below is a detailed elucidation of each question, adhering to the specified requirements.

Paper For Above instruction

1. Using your textbook and readings, give an example of an abnormal behavior and identify the school of thought associated with it.

An example of abnormal behavior is persistent depression characterized by prolonged feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest, which impair daily functioning. According to the psychodynamic school of thought, such behavior is viewed as a manifestation of unresolved unconscious conflicts, often rooted in childhood experiences or repressed feelings. Sigmund Freud's theories suggest that depression may stem from intra-psychic conflicts, like guilt or unresolved feelings of loss, manifesting in symptoms such as anhedonia and low mood (Freud, 1923). Alternatively, behavioral approaches interpret depression as maladaptive learned behaviors reinforced over time, emphasizing the role of environmental stimuli and reinforcement history. Cognitive-behavioral models further explore distorted thought patterns contributing to depression, focusing on negative automatic thoughts and maladaptive beliefs. Recognizing the school of thought guides treatment strategies, whether through psychoanalysis, behavioral modification, or cognitive restructuring. Identification of these perspectives is crucial for effective intervention and understanding of complex mental health conditions. (American Psychiatric Association, 2013)

2. Identify the differences between experimental and nonexperimental research designs. Give an example of each type of design.

Experimental research involves manipulating one or more independent variables to observe their effect on dependent variables, allowing for causal inferences. Random assignment enhances internal validity by evenly distributing extraneous variables. For example, a clinical trial testing a new antidepressant involves randomly assigning participants to treatment and placebo groups to evaluate efficacy. Conversely, nonexperimental research does not manipulate variables; instead, it observes naturally occurring phenomena to identify correlations or associations. Observational studies, surveys, and case studies exemplify nonexperimental designs. For instance, a correlational study exploring the relationship between stress levels and academic performance in students observes existing conditions without intervention. The main difference lies in control; experimental studies actively manipulate variables to establish causality, while nonexperimental studies aim to observe and describe relationships without manipulation. Both approaches are vital in psychological research, serving different investigative purposes (Creswell, 2014).

3. How do we separate anxious or superstitious thoughts and behaviors from obsessions and compulsions?

Distinguishing between anxious or superstitious thoughts and true obsessions and compulsions involves evaluating the nature, frequency, and impact of these thoughts and behaviors. Obsessive thoughts are intrusive, persistent, and often irrational, causing significant distress and consuming considerable time, which interferes with daily functioning. Compulsions are repetitive behaviors performed to reduce anxiety arising from obsessions, often driven by a sense of necessity rather than superstition. Superstitious behaviors, in contrast, are based on beliefs in luck or supernatural causality and do not necessarily produce significant distress or impairment. Clinicians assess whether the behaviors are ego-dystonic (intrusive and unwanted) and if they serve to alleviate severe anxiety characteristic of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). In cases where behaviors are ritualistic but do not cause marked distress or interference, they are less likely to be classified as obsessions and compulsions. Evaluation tools like clinical interviews and validated scales aid in this differential diagnosis (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

4. There has been a lot of media attention surrounding PTSD and other stress-related disorders. What can we as a society do to help individuals who suffer from these disorders? Is there anything we can do to prevent these stress reactions from becoming disorders?

Society can support individuals suffering from PTSD by fostering awareness, reducing stigma, and ensuring access to mental health services. Education campaigns promote understanding that PTSD is a legitimate health condition, encouraging victims to seek help without shame. Community outreach programs can provide early intervention, psychoeducation, and trauma-informed care, which are essential for recovery. Creating supportive environments, such as peer support groups and workplace accommodations, further facilitates healing. Prevention of stress reactions developing into full-blown disorders involves resilience-building strategies, including stress management training, promoting social support networks, and teaching coping skills pre- and post-trauma. Early screening following traumatic events can identify at-risk individuals, enabling timely psychological interventions like cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR). Overall, societal efforts should aim to create supportive settings, educate the public, and provide accessible mental health resources to mitigate long-term distress (Sareen et al., 2007).

5. Some people have argued that dissociative disorders (such as dissociative identity disorder) are not real, and that individuals displaying these symptoms are “faking it.” What evidence might a clinician be able to gather to support one of these assertions?

Clinicians assessing dissociative disorders can evaluate the consistency and context of symptoms, look for signs of malingering, and use standardized tests to differentiate genuine cases from fabricated ones. Evidence supporting skepticism may include inconsistent histories, exaggerated symptoms, or responses influenced by external incentives, such as financial gains. Clinicians may also examine whether the presentation aligns with known dissociative disorder criteria, such as disruptions in identity or memory that are not attributable to neurological conditions or substance use. Projective tests like the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) can quantify dissociative symptoms objectively. Neuroimaging studies may reveal brain activity patterns consistent with dissociation, supporting their legitimacy. Conversely, signs of malingering, such as minimal internal inconsistency or external motivators, might suggest faking. Ultimately, careful clinical assessment, including collateral informants and psychological testing, can help establish the authenticity of dissociative symptoms (Lynn et al., 2012).

6. Why are women more likely to be diagnosed with depression than men? Which theory do you believe and why?

Women are more frequently diagnosed with depression than men, a disparity attributed to various biological, psychological, and social factors. The hormonal fluctuations associated with menstrual cycles, pregnancy, and menopause influence mood regulation, increasing vulnerability to depression (Kuehner, 2017). Psychosocial theories suggest that women face greater societal pressures, gender roles, and expectations, which may lead to higher stress levels and feelings of helplessness. Additionally, women tend to be more expressive about emotional distress and seek help more readily, resulting in higher diagnosis rates. I find the biopsychosocial model particularly compelling because it integrates biological predispositions, psychological factors such as rumination, and social stressors, providing a comprehensive understanding. Rumination, especially, has been linked to depression, and women are more prone to this cognitive style (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008). This model explains the complexity and interplay of multiple factors, making it the most convincing explanation for gender disparities in depression diagnosis.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  • Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. Liveright Publishing Corporation.
  • Kuehner, C. (2017). Why is depression more common among women than among men? The Lancet Psychiatry, 4(2), 146-158.
  • Lynn, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Merckelbach, H. (2012). Dissociative disorders and malingering: A review of the evidence. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 370-379.
  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Ruminative coping and depression. Psychological Bulletin, 134(5), 691-711.
  • Sareen, J., et al. (2007). Trauma exposure and PTSD in the US: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(12), 1350-1358.

These comprehensive responses provide a scholarly understanding of the specified psychological concepts, incorporating current theories and research findings.

Related Assignments