Missing U.S. Navy History: An Investigation Of The Enlisted

Missing U.S. Navy History An Investigation of the Enlisted Ranks Formation

Among a small group of people that includes a few naval historians, sailors, and concerned civilians, an awareness of missing information has been growing. Subjects are broken up and facts have been spread out among different sources. Genres of different subjects concerned with the United States Navy are lacking in documentation of past events.

This paper will focus on the development of the U.S. Navy enlisted ranks. It will piece together the chronological order of events that led to the formation of the current enlisted ranking system in the U.S. Navy. Understanding this evolution is crucial to preserving naval heritage and acknowledging the contributions of lower-ranked sailors whose histories are often overlooked.

Paper For Above instruction

The history of the United States Navy is characterized by evolution and adaptation, reflecting the changing needs of maritime defense and military organization. One of the most significant aspects of naval history is the development of the enlisted ranking system, which has undergone numerous changes since the Navy’s inception. Despite its importance, the detailed origins and evolution of these ranks remain inadequately documented, partly due to a tendency within the Navy to neglect the historical significance of lower enlisted ranks. This paper aims to trace the formation and development of the U.S. Navy enlisted ranks, emphasizing the importance of preserving this often neglected part of naval heritage.

The inception of the U.S. Navy in 1775 marked the beginning of a formalized naval ranking system influenced heavily by British naval traditions. The Continental Congress established the Navy with a small fleet of vessels crewed primarily by sailors familiar with British maritime practices. The British Royal Navy had a well-established ranking system that the Americans adapted, including the ranks of petty officers and seamen. This influence is evident in the origins of rank titles and insignia, many of which derive from British nomenclature and structure. For example, the rank of “petty officer” originates from the French word “petit,” meaning “small,” and historically referred to subordinate officials assisting higher officers in medieval European villages and castles.

The development of petty officer ranks in the U.S. Navy reflects this European influence. Initially, petty officers served as assistants and supervisors among the crew, a role rooted in British naval tradition. It was only in 1841 that the U.S. Navy officially adopted petty officer ranks, mirroring the British practice of dividing petty officers into higher and lower grades. The rank of Petty Officer Third-Class was introduced as the lowest petty officer status, with additional grades—Second-Class and First-Class—being established later in 1841 to better distinguish levels of experience and authority among enlisted sailors (Oliver & Museum Curator, 1983). Likewise, the seaman branch was subdivided into Seaman Recruit, Seaman Apprentice, and Seaman to create clearer career progressions and roles aboard ships.

Another pivotal development in the evolution of enlisted ranks was the creation of the Chief Petty Officer rank in 1893. This rank represented a significant milestone, symbolizing a transition into a brotherhood dedicated to leadership and technical expertise. Its establishment was rooted in the desire to create a specialized, highly trained cadre capable of managing complex tasks on ships and in naval establishments. The date, April 1, 1893, is now considered a ceremonial anniversary known among some Navy circles (“History of the Chief Petty Officer Grade,” 1993). The rank's origins are intertwined with the British tradition of senior petty officers, who held responsibilities beyond ordinary petty officers, often acting as technical specialists and intermediate leaders between officers and enlisted sailors.

Following the creation of the Chief Petty Officer rank, subsequent advancements in the enlisted hierarchy included the development of the Senior Chief Petty Officer and Master Chief Petty Officer ranks in 1958. These ranks were created to recognize experience, leadership, and technical mastery among senior enlisted personnel. The formal establishment was driven by the need for more effective management of personnel and resources, especially as wartime and peacetime demands increased complexity of naval operations (“Academy History,” 2014). Significantly, these ranks also symbolize a shift in the Navy’s recognition of enlisted sailors as vital contributors to operational success, deserving of leadership roles and career progression pathways.

However, despite these milestones, there remains a profound gap in the documentation and acknowledgment of the lower ranks—specifically the Seaman, Petty Officer Third-Class, and other junior enlisted ratings. These ranks, foundational to the Navy’s operational structure, were historically viewed as less critical and often neglected in official histories. Such neglect stems from a broader human tendency to devalue what is perceived as “irrelevant” or “useless” knowledge (“The Uses of Maritime History,” 2003). This perspective has contributed to a collective amnesia regarding the origins, responsibilities, and contributions of lower-ranked sailors. Yet, understanding their history is essential to appreciating the full fabric of naval heritage and acknowledging the importance of every rank in the sea services.

Efforts by civilian historians and naval enthusiasts have sought to fill this knowledge gap. Samuel Malin’s compilation of enlisted ratings from 1775 to 1969, for example, provides valuable insights into the evolution of rank structures and individual roles (Malin, 1999). Nevertheless, these efforts are often fragmented and not integrated into official Navy histories. A collaborative initiative involving both naval authorities and civilian historians could ensure the systematic preservation of these ranks' histories, fostering a more inclusive understanding of naval heritage. Recognizing and valorizing the history of lower enlisted ranks would promote esprit de corps, respect, and continuity within the Navy, fostering pride among sailors from the earliest stages of their careers.

In conclusion, the development of the U.S. Navy’s enlisted ranks reflects a complex history rooted in European naval traditions and shaped by evolving operational needs. While significant milestones such as the creation of petty officer ranks in 1841 and the senior enlisted ranks in 1958 are well documented, the histories of the lower ranks remain underrepresented and undervalued. It is imperative that both military and civilian efforts converge to preserve and promote this neglected heritage. Appreciating the full scope of naval history, including the contributions of all ranks, enhances our understanding of the Navy’s evolution and fosters a sense of unity and pride among current and future sailors. Failing to do so risks losing vital historical knowledge that binds the naval community across generations and underscores the importance of every sailor’s role in maritime history.

References

  • Cutler, T. J. (2002). Ranks, rates, ratings, and paygrades. In The BlueJacket's manual (100th ed., pp. 28-55). U.S. Naval Institute.
  • Hattendorf, J. B. (2003). The uses of maritime history in and for the navy. Naval War College Review, 56(2), 1-16.
  • History of the U.S. navy. (2012). Naval Historical Center. Retrieved July 20, 2014, from https://www.history.navy.mil
  • Malin, C. A. (1999). Compilation of enlisted ratings and apprenticeships, U.S. navy, 1775 to 1969. Naval Historical Center.
  • Malin, C. A. (2012). Ratings and the evolution of jobs in the navy. Naval Historical Center. Retrieved July 25, 2014, from https://www.history.navy.mil
  • Military-Ranks.org. (2014). United States Navy ranks in order. Retrieved July 25, 2014, from https://www.military-ranks.org
  • Naval History and Heritage Command. (2012). Chief of naval operations. Retrieved July 29, 2014, from https://www.history.navy.mil
  • Naval History and Heritage Command. (2013). Master chief petty officers of the navy. Retrieved July 29, 2014, from https://www.history.navy.mil
  • Oliver, R., & Museum Curator for McClellan Aviation Museum. (1983). Why is the colonel called "kernal"? The origin of the ranks and rank insignia now used by the United States armed forces. Sacramento, CA: Office of History.
  • Tomlinson, R. (ca. 1790). The Anacreontic Song. London, England: A. Bland's Music Warehouse.

Related Assignments