Module 02 Critical Thinking Assignment Operations Management

Module 02 Critical Thinking Assignmentoperations Management And Facto

Maduro Cleaning is a small organization that provides cleaning services to both residential and commercial clients. As a small organization, the owner assigns crews of two, three, or four employees to jobs each morning but the owner does not have a good method of determining a reasonable amount of time that each cleaning should take. The owner decided to keep data on job times and crew sizes in the hopes of developing a productivity measure. Address the following requirements: Calculate which of the crew sizes has the best productivity per worker, and explain your method. Evaluate your outcome and the possible reasons that would explain those results.

Project what the productivity might be for a crew size of five and explain your reasoning. Crew Size Avg: Productivity per Crew 2: 3765 square meters per day 3: 4915 square meters per day 4: 6309 square meters per day. Directions: Your essay is required to be four to five pages in length, which does not include the title page and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements. Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles. Use the Saudi Digital Library to find your resources. Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and follow APA style guidelines.

Paper For Above instruction

The assessment of productivity in operations management often involves analyzing how efficiently resources are being used to generate outputs. In the context of Maduro Cleaning, understanding which crew size yields the highest productivity per worker is essential for optimizing scheduling, improving efficiency, and maximizing profitability. This paper explores the calculation of productivity for different crew sizes, evaluates the findings, and projects future productivity for a larger crew, all underpinned by relevant operations management theories and scholarly research.

Introduction

Operational efficiency is a critical determinant of a service organization’s success. For Maduro Cleaning, a small business providing cleaning services, determining the optimal crew size is vital for streamlining operations and enhancing productivity. Productivity, often measured as output per unit of input, can vary depending on crew composition, task complexity, and other operational factors. By analyzing existing data on crew sizes and corresponding productivity, management can make informed decisions to improve resource allocation. This study calculates the productivity per worker for crew sizes of two, three, and four, evaluates these findings, and estimates potential productivity for a crew of five, integrating principles from operations management such as economies of scale, diminishing returns, and capacity utilization.

Methodology: Calculating Productivity per Worker

The data provided includes the average total productivity of crews of different sizes:

• 2-person crew: 3,765 square meters per day
• 3-person crew: 4,915 square meters per day
• 4-person crew: 6,309 square meters per day

To identify the most efficient crew size, we calculate the productivity per individual worker within each crew. This involves dividing the total crew productivity by the number of workers in the crew:

Productivity per worker = Total crew productivity / Crew size

Calculations

From the calculations, the crew of two has the highest productivity per worker at approximately 1,882.5 square meters per day, followed by the three-person crew and the four-person crew.

Evaluation of Results and Possible Explanations

The analysis indicates that smaller crews, specifically the two-person team, are more productive on a per-worker basis. Several factors can explain this outcome. First, coordination and communication are simpler in smaller teams, reducing delays and misunderstandings. Second, smaller crews may be more motivated, as individual effort is more directly observable and rewarded. Third, the fixed costs of supervision and setup might be more proportionate in larger crews, diminishing marginal productivity. Additionally, operational constraints, such as space limitations or task complexity, might favor smaller teams for efficiency.

However, it is also crucial to consider that while productivity per worker is highest in smaller crews, larger crews may achieve higher total outputs, which could be more beneficial depending on organizational priorities. The findings align with the principles of economies of scale and diminishing returns, where increasing crew size does not linearly increase per-worker productivity.

Projection of Productivity for a Crew of Five

Given the trend observed, a crew of five might be expected to produce more than 6,309 square meters per day, but with a potential decrease in per-worker productivity due to diminishing returns. A simple projection can be made by analyzing the average increase in total productivity as crew size increases:

• From 2 to 3: increase of 1,150 sq meters
• From 3 to 4: increase of 1,394 sq meters

The average increase per additional crew member is approximately 1,272 square meters. Applying this average to forecast productivity for five crew members:

Estimated total productivity = 6,309 + 1,272 ≈ 7,581 square meters

And the productivity per worker would then be:

7,581 / 5 ≈ 1,516 square meters

This projection suggests a decrease in per-worker productivity compared to smaller crews, consistent with diminishing returns phenomenon.

Conclusion

Analyzing the productivity data of Maduro Cleaning reveals that smaller crews, specifically two-person teams, are most efficient on a per-worker basis. While larger crews increase total output, they tend to decrease the productivity per individual worker due to coordination challenges and diminishing returns. Projecting for a crew of five supports this trend, anticipating a total output of around 7,581 square meters with a corresponding decline in per-worker productivity. These insights underscore the importance of balancing crew size to optimize overall efficiency and effectiveness in service operations.

References

• Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations Management (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A., & Johnston, R. (2016). Operations Management (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Chase, R. B., Aquilano, N. J., & Jacobs, F. R. (2019). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2004). Build-to-order supply chain management: A perspective of future manufacturing and logistics. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 251-267.
• Jain, R., & Singh, K. (2014). Factors influencing productivity in service sector organizations. Journal of Business and Management, 16(6), 45-53.
• Johnson, H. T., & Flynn, P. (2019). Operations Management: Systems and Supply Chains. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Stevenson, W. J. (2018). Operations Management (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Melnyk, S. A., Davis, E. W., & Sandor, J. (2014). Supply Chain Management. Wiley.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Parsons, J., & Olorunniwo, F. (2020). Enhancing productivity in service firms: The role of process improvement initiatives. Journal of Service Management, 31(2), 283-304.